본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Building Consensus on the Priority-Setting for National Policies in Health Information Technology: A Delphi Survey

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence inthe Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects relatedto health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphitechnique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. Methods: Data were collected from November2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panelconsisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information PolicyAdvisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society ofMedical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains:technology, application, and infrastructure. Results: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importanceof 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, QuadrantI of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the applicationdomain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. Conclusions: Most items with high importance and urgency belongedto the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be policeswith top priorities of HIT.

Abstract

Objectives: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence inthe Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects relatedto health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphitechnique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. Methods: Data were collected from November2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panelconsisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information PolicyAdvisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society ofMedical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains:technology, application, and infrastructure. Results: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importanceof 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, QuadrantI of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the applicationdomain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. Conclusions: Most items with high importance and urgency belongedto the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be policeswith top priorities of HIT.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Strategic report of smart healthcare devices and technology standards" (2018)[URL]
  2. "National e-Health Strategy" (2008)[URL]
  3. 박정원, "디지털 헬스케어 발전을 위한 규제 개선 방안에 관한 연구", 정보화정책, 25(1), pp.60~81 (2018), 한국지능정보사회진흥원[DOI]
  4. "The 4th Industrial Revolution and digital healthcare policies" (2018)[URL]
  5. Flores M, "P4 medicine : how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society", Per Med, 10(6), pp.565~576 (2013)
  6. "Recent trends and implications for digital healthcare" (2018)[URL]
  7. "Strategies and implications for ICTbased healthcare industry in major countries" (2016)[URL]
  8. Scott RE, "Principles and framework for eHealth strategy development", J Med Internet Res, 15(7), pp.e155~ (2013)
  9. "National eHealth Strategy Toolkit" (2012)[URL]
  10. "15th Meeting of the eHealth Network" (2019)[URL]
  11. Blumenthal D, "Launching HITECH", N Engl J Med, 362(5), pp.382~385 (2010)
  12. Neumeier M, "Access 2022: setting new goals for digital health in Canada", Can J Nurs Inform, 14(1, pp.2) (2019), 1~2
  13. Kim SJ, "An empirical study on efficient fiscal management for PPP (Public-Private Partnership)projects by using Delphi methods", J Public Policy Gov, 11(3), pp.67~99 (2017)
  14. Rowe G, "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool : issues and analysis", Int J Forecast, 15(4), pp.353~375 (1999)
  15. Hsu CC, "The Delphi technique : making sense of consensus", Pract Assess Res Eval, 12(1), pp.10~ (2007)
  16. Ludwig B, "Predicting the future : Have you considered using the Delphi methodology", J Ext, 35(5), pp.1~4 (1997)
  17. Gordon TJ, "Futures research methodology", pp.1~30 (1994), American Council for the United Nations University
  18. Delbecq AL, "Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes", Scott and Foresman, ~ (1975)
  19. Keeney S, "A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing", Int J Nurs Stud, 38(2), pp.195~200 (2001)
  20. Murry JW, "Delphi : a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research", Rev High Educ, 18(4), pp.423~436 (1995)
  21. Diamond IR, "Defining consensus : a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies", J Clin Epidemiol, 67(4), pp.401~409 (2014)
  22. 김지혜, "DEA와 맘퀴스트 생산성 지수를 활용한 OECD 국가간 의료서비스 효율성 분석", 한국경영과학회지, 37(4), pp.125~138 (2012), 한국경영과학회[DOI]
  23. "Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2020-2025" (2020)[URL]
  24. Hersh W, "Educating 10,000 informaticians by 2010: the AMIA 10x10 program", Int J Med Inform, 76(5-6), pp.377~382 (2007)
  25. Gibson CJ, "Convergent evolution of health information management and health informatics : a perspective on the future of information professionals in health care", Appl Clin Inform, 6(1), pp.163~184 (2015)
  26. Daniel Luna, "Health Informatics in Developing Countries: Going beyond Pilot Practices to Sustainable Implementations: A Review of the Current Challenges", Healthcare Informatics Research, 20(1), pp.3~10 (2014), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  27. Marc D, "Global workforce trends in health informatics &information management", Stud Health Technol Inform, 264, pp.1273~1277 (2019)
  28. "Certification of Health IT" (2020)[URL]
  29. "Promoting the use of high-quality electronic health record systems" (2020)[URL]
  30. "The foundation of digital health care in Korea Electronic Medical Record System Certification" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)