본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cancer Risk Score Prediction Based on a Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Network

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are performed to study the associations between genetic variants withrespect to certain phenotypic traits such as cancer. However, the method that is commonly used in GWAS assumes that certaintraits are solely affected by a single mutation. We propose a network analysis method, in which we generate associationnetworks of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that can differentiate case and control groups. We hypothesize thatcertain phenotypic traits are attributable to mutations in groups of associated SNPs. Methods: We propose a method basedon a network analysis framework to study SNP-SNP interactions related to cancer incidence. We employed logistic regressionto measure the significance of all SNP pairs from GWAS for the incidence of colorectal cancer and computed a cancer riskscore based on the generated SNP networks. Results: We demonstrated our method in a dataset from a case-control studyof colorectal cancer in the South Sulawesi population. From the GWAS results, 20,094 pairs of 200 SNPs were created. Weobtained one cluster containing four pairs of five SNPs that passed the filtering threshold based on their p-values. A locus onchromosome 12 (12:54410007) was found to be strongly connected to the four variants on chromosome 1. A polygenic riskscore was computed from the five SNPs, and a significant difference in colorectal cancer risk was obtained between the caseand control groups. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the applicability of our method to understand SNP-SNP interactionsand compute risk scores for various types of cancer.

Abstract

Objectives: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are performed to study the associations between genetic variants withrespect to certain phenotypic traits such as cancer. However, the method that is commonly used in GWAS assumes that certaintraits are solely affected by a single mutation. We propose a network analysis method, in which we generate associationnetworks of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that can differentiate case and control groups. We hypothesize thatcertain phenotypic traits are attributable to mutations in groups of associated SNPs. Methods: We propose a method basedon a network analysis framework to study SNP-SNP interactions related to cancer incidence. We employed logistic regressionto measure the significance of all SNP pairs from GWAS for the incidence of colorectal cancer and computed a cancer riskscore based on the generated SNP networks. Results: We demonstrated our method in a dataset from a case-control studyof colorectal cancer in the South Sulawesi population. From the GWAS results, 20,094 pairs of 200 SNPs were created. Weobtained one cluster containing four pairs of five SNPs that passed the filtering threshold based on their p-values. A locus onchromosome 12 (12:54410007) was found to be strongly connected to the four variants on chromosome 1. A polygenic riskscore was computed from the five SNPs, and a significant difference in colorectal cancer risk was obtained between the caseand control groups. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the applicability of our method to understand SNP-SNP interactionsand compute risk scores for various types of cancer.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Fact sheet: cancer" (2022)[URL]
  2. "Global Cancer Observatory: estimated number of new cases and deaths in 2020" (2022)[URL]
  3. Miller KD, "Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019", CA Cancer J Clin, 69(5), pp.363~385 (2019)[DOI]
  4. Wattacheril J, "Lagtimes in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer : determinants and association with cancer stage and survival", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 28(9), pp.1166~1174 (2008)[DOI]
  5. Wulfkuhle JD, "Proteomic applications for the early detection of cancer", Nat Rev Cancer, 3(4), pp.267~275 (2003)[DOI]
  6. Hecht SS, "Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer", Nat Rev Cancer, 3(10), pp.733~744 (2003)[DOI]
  7. Rehm J, "Alcohol consumption. A leading risk factor for cancer", Chem Biol Interact, 331, pp.109280~ (2020)[DOI]
  8. Key TJ, "Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer", Public Health Nutr, 7(1A), pp.187~200 (2004)[DOI]
  9. Lee IM, "Physical activity and cancer prevention : data from epidemiologic studies", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 35(11), pp.1823~1827 (2003)[DOI]
  10. Yusuf I, "Genetic risk factors for colorectal cancer in multiethnic Indonesians", Sci Rep, 11(1), pp.9988~ (2021)[DOI]
  11. Zuk O, "The mystery of missing heritability : genetic interactions create phantom heritability", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109(4), pp.1193~1198 (2012)[DOI]
  12. Sapkota Y, "Assessing SNP-SNP interactions among DNA repair, modification and metabolism related pathway genes in breast cancer susceptibility", PLoS One, 8(6), pp.e64896~ (2013)[DOI]
  13. Lin HY, "SNP-SNP interaction network in angiogenesis genes associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness", PLoS One, 8(4), pp.e59688~ (2013)[DOI]
  14. Goodman J, "Ensemble samplers with affine invariance", Commun Appl Math Comput Sci, 5(1), pp.65~80 (2010)
  15. Jiao S, "Genome-wide search for gene-gene interactions in colorectal cancer", PLoS One, 7(12), pp.e52535~ (2012)[DOI]
  16. Loblich M, "Network analysis : a qualitative approach to empirical studies on communication policy", Int Commun Gaz, 73(7), pp.630~647 (2011)[DOI]
  17. Kontou PI, "Network analysis of genes and their association with diseases", Gene, 590(1), pp.68~78 (2016)[DOI]
  18. Chang HH, "Phenotype prediction by integrative network analysis of SNP and gene expression microarrays", Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2011, pp.6849~6852 (2011)
  19. Levine ME, "A weighted SNP correlation network method for estimating polygenic risk scores", Methods Mol Biol, 1613, pp.277~290 (2017)[DOI]
  20. Joyner C, "A two-phase Bayesian methodology for the analysis of binary phenotypes in genome-wide association studies", Biom J, 62(1), pp.191~201 (2020)[DOI]
  21. Amadeus S, "A design of polygenic risk model with deep learning for colorectal cancer in multiethnic Indonesians", Procedia Comput Sci, 179, pp.632~639 (2022)[DOI]
  22. Mahesworo B, "Systematic evaluation of cross population polygenic risk score on colorectal cancer", Procedia Comput Sci, 179, pp.344~351 (2021)[DOI]
  23. Baurley JW, "Smokescreen : a targeted genotyping array for addiction research", BMC Genomics, 17, pp.145~ (2016)[DOI]
  24. Raj A, "fastSTRUCTURE : variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets", Genetics, 197(2), pp.573~589 (2014)[DOI]
  25. Pruim RJ, "LocusZoom : regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results", Bioinformatics, 26(18), pp.2336~2337 (2010)[DOI]
  26. Ji M, "Silencing homeobox C6 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation", Oncotarget, 7(20), pp.29216~29227 (2016)[DOI]
  27. Li J, "Pathologic evolution-related Gene Analysis based on both single-cell and bulk transcriptomics in colorectal cancer", J Cancer, 11(23), pp.6861~6873 (2020)[DOI]
  28. Qi L, "The effects of differentially-expressed homeobox family genes on the prognosis and HOXC6 on immune microenvironment orchestration in colorectal cancer", Front Immunol, 12, pp.781221~ (2021)[DOI]
  29. Kafaie S, "A network approach to prioritizing susceptibility genes for genome-wide association studies", Genet Epidemiol, 43(5), pp.477~491 (2019)[DOI]
  30. Pandey A, "Epistasis network centrality analysis yields pathway replication across two GWAS cohorts for bipolar disorder", Transl Psychiatry, 2(8), pp.e154~ (2012)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)