본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Russian and Japanese Diplomatic Responses on Interrogations Records of Ahn Jung-Geun

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper provides a new fact as following through interrogation records of Ahn Jung-Geun. The investigation of the case of Ahn Jung-Geun by Russian and Japanese jurisdictions proceeded as follows: Public Prosecutor Miller of Border District Court conducted the investigation with focus on Ahn and tried to find holes in the testimony related to Ahn’s whereabouts and actions after arriving a day ahead. Hence, the fact that the railway police of the Chinese Eastern Railway faithfully conducted their duties was emphasized. Second, Miller investigated in detail the testimony and reported that it was the Japanese consul general who controlled the access of Japanese nationals. Miller’s intent was to eliminate any responsibility on the Russian side for the assassination. Third, Magistrate Strazov and Miller checked the three person’s activities at Chegagu Station, and on the grounds that Ahn was a Korean national, judged that Japan had jurisdiction over the case. The Russian judiciary put maximum emphasis on the fact that there was no participation by Russians in the assassination, only Koreans. The utmost priority of the Japanese government at the time was to prevent Ahn’s grave from becoming a site of pilgrimage for the Korean independence movement. By the same token, the Japanese even refused to hand over Ahn’s body to his family until the end. In fact, the Japanese even buried Ahn in a Lushun Prison public cemetery. To thwart the plan to set up Ahn Jung-Geun’s grave in the cemetery for Koreans in Harbin, the Japanese most likely cremated Ahn’s body buried in the public cemetery in Lushun. After all, this paper traced the confrontation and cooperation of Russia

Abstract

This paper provides a new fact as following through interrogation records of Ahn Jung-Geun. The investigation of the case of Ahn Jung-Geun by Russian and Japanese jurisdictions proceeded as follows: Public Prosecutor Miller of Border District Court conducted the investigation with focus on Ahn and tried to find holes in the testimony related to Ahn’s whereabouts and actions after arriving a day ahead. Hence, the fact that the railway police of the Chinese Eastern Railway faithfully conducted their duties was emphasized. Second, Miller investigated in detail the testimony and reported that it was the Japanese consul general who controlled the access of Japanese nationals. Miller’s intent was to eliminate any responsibility on the Russian side for the assassination. Third, Magistrate Strazov and Miller checked the three person’s activities at Chegagu Station, and on the grounds that Ahn was a Korean national, judged that Japan had jurisdiction over the case. The Russian judiciary put maximum emphasis on the fact that there was no participation by Russians in the assassination, only Koreans. The utmost priority of the Japanese government at the time was to prevent Ahn’s grave from becoming a site of pilgrimage for the Korean independence movement. By the same token, the Japanese even refused to hand over Ahn’s body to his family until the end. In fact, the Japanese even buried Ahn in a Lushun Prison public cemetery. To thwart the plan to set up Ahn Jung-Geun’s grave in the cemetery for Koreans in Harbin, the Japanese most likely cremated Ahn’s body buried in the public cemetery in Lushun. After all, this paper traced the confrontation and cooperation of Russia

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "Archives of Foreign Policy of Russian Empire (AVPRI), f. 150, op. 493, d. 1279", ~
  2. Ahn Jung-Geun Memorial Association, "Interrogation Records by the Russian Officials" (2010), Chaeryun
  3. Kim, Chang-Soo, "Asia’s Foremost Hero Ahn Jung-Geun Vol. 13" (1995), Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs
  4. Kokovtsev, V.N., "Memoirs 1903–1919 Vol. 1" (1992), Nauka
  5. 外務省外交史料館, "The Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan", 4門2類5項245號. 伊藤公爵滿洲視察一件, ~
  6. Woo, Duk-Soon, "The Public Trial Records of Ahn Jung-Geun" (1946), Kyeonghyang
  7. Cho, Gwang, "Contemporary Research Position of Ahn Jung-Geun Study and Its Problems", Journal of Korean Modern and Contemporary History, 12, pp.188~222 (2000)
  8. 최서면, "안중근 묘역 추정의 경과", 한국근현대사연구, (46), pp.205~235 (2008), 한국근현대사학회
  9. Han, Sang-kwon, "Assassination of Ito Hirobumi by Ahn Jung-Geun and Ahn’s Personal Testimony at the Public Trial Against Him (2)", Duksung Women’s University Journal, 33, pp.31~59 (2004)
  10. "History Archives of Russian State (RGIA), f.560, op. 28, d. 422", ~
  11. 홍웅호, "안중근의 이토 사살 사건과 러일 관계", 사학연구, (100), pp.671~705 (2010), 한국사학회
  12. Lee, Tae-Jin, "Eternally Burst into Flames: Ahn Jung-Geun" (2010), Jisiksaneopsa
  13. Pak, Bella B., "Ahn Jung-Geun" (2012), Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
  14. Pak, Boris D., "Punishment at Harbin Station" (1999), Institute of oriental studies RAS
  15. Park, Seon-Joo, "The Research of the Grave of Ahn Jung-Geun’s Remains", Journal of Humanities, 43, pp.1~41 (2011)
  16. Shin, Woon-Yong, "Ahn Jung-Geun and Korean Modern History" (2009), Chaeryun
  17. 신운용, "안중근유해의 조사 · 발굴 현황과 전망", 역사문화연구, (36), pp.113~146 (2010), 역사문화연구소
  18. 戶塚悅郞, "Eternally Burst into Flames: Ahn Jung-Geun", pp.99~146 (2010), Jisiksaneopsa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)