본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Female Mentors and Peers: A Heterogeneity Analysis of Gender Gaps in Attitudes towards STEM in South Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper investigates whether gender-matching school environments can foster girls’ interest and motivation in science. Using the 2015 PISA data for South Korea, the findings show that single-sex schooling and female teachers have positive effects on high-performing girls’ attitudes in science studies. By attending an all-girls school and being taught by female science teachers, girls who are ranked in the highest quartile of the science test become as motivated and interested in pursuing studies and careers in STEM fields as boys in the same rank. In addition, female teachers also enhance competitive attitudes of average- and low-performing girls. But single-sex schooling has no positive effect on them. These heterogeneous results propose gender-matching schooling as a useful policy instrument to recruit female talent among high-performing girls into STEM fields. Yet, this effect is not universal and therefore cannot be generalized to everyone.

Abstract

This paper investigates whether gender-matching school environments can foster girls’ interest and motivation in science. Using the 2015 PISA data for South Korea, the findings show that single-sex schooling and female teachers have positive effects on high-performing girls’ attitudes in science studies. By attending an all-girls school and being taught by female science teachers, girls who are ranked in the highest quartile of the science test become as motivated and interested in pursuing studies and careers in STEM fields as boys in the same rank. In addition, female teachers also enhance competitive attitudes of average- and low-performing girls. But single-sex schooling has no positive effect on them. These heterogeneous results propose gender-matching schooling as a useful policy instrument to recruit female talent among high-performing girls into STEM fields. Yet, this effect is not universal and therefore cannot be generalized to everyone.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Abadie, Alberto, "Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(1), pp.1~11 (2011)
  2. Bettinger, Eric, "Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students", American Economic Review, 95(2), pp.152~157 (2005)
  3. Billger, Sherrilyn, "On Reconstructing School Segregation: The Efficacy and Equity of Single-Sex Schooling", Economics of Education Review, 28(3), pp.393~402 (2009)
  4. Booth, Alison, "Choosing to Compete: How Different are Girls and Boys?", Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 81(2), pp.542~555 (2012)
  5. Separate but Superior? A Review of Issues and Data Bearing on Single-sex Education, "Bracey, Gerald", Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice, ~ (2006)
  6. Carrell, Scott, "Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), pp.1101~1144 (2010)
  7. Dee, Thomas, "Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement", Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), pp.528~554 (2007)
  8. Doris, Aedin, "Gender, Single-sex Schooling and Maths Achievement", Economics of Education Review, 35, pp.104~119 (2013)
  9. Dustmann, Christian, "Why Are Single-sex Schools Successful?", Labour Economics, 54, pp.79~99 (2018)
  10. Eisenkopf, Gerald, "Academic Performance and Single-sex Schooling:Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Switzerland", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 115, pp.123~143 (2015)
  11. Fryer, Roland G. Jr., "An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics", American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), pp.210~240 (2010)
  12. Gneezy, Uri, "Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), pp.1049~1074 (2003)
  13. Goodkind, Sara, "Providing New Opportunities or Reinforcing Old Stereotypes? Perceptions and Experiences of Single-sex Public Education", Children and Youth Services Review, 35(8), pp.1174~1181 (2013)
  14. "Government of the Republic of Korea" (2016)[URL]
  15. Halpern, Diane, "The Pseudoscience of Single-sex Schooling", Science, 333(6050), pp.1706~1707 (2011)
  16. Hanushek, Eric, "The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools", Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), pp.1141~1177 (1986)
  17. Hanushek, Eric, "The Economic Value of Higher Teacher Quality", Economics of Education Review, 30(3), pp.466~479 (2011)
  18. Hill, Andrew, "The Girl Next Door: The Effect of Opposite Gender Friends on High School Achievement", American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(3), pp.147~177 (2015)
  19. Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation, "Hoxby, Caroline", National Bureau of Economics, ~, pp.National Bureau of Economics, No. 7867 (2000)
  20. Jackson, C. Kirabo, "Single-sex Schools, Student Achievement, and Course Selection: Evidence from Rule-based Student Assignments in Trinidad and Tobago", Journal of Public Economics, 96, pp.173~187 (2012)
  21. Estimation of Education Production Function Focusing on School Effects and Policy Directions for Primary and Secondary Education, "Kim, Hisam", Korea Development Institute, ~, pp.KDI Research Monograph 2012-09 (2012)
  22. Krueger, Alan, "Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), pp.497~532 (1999)
  23. Krueger, Alan, "Economic Considerations and Class Size", Economic Journal, 113(485), pp.34~63 (2003)
  24. Lavy, Victor, "Mechanisms and Impacts of Gender Peer Effects at School", American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), pp.1~33 (2011)
  25. Lee, Soohyung, "Do Single-sex Schools Make Girls More Competitive?", Economics Letters, 124(3), pp.474~477 (2014)
  26. Lim, Jaegeum, "The Impact of Teacher-Student Gender Matches: Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea", Journal of Human Resources, 52(4), pp.979~997 (2017)
  27. Single-sex Schooling and Student Performance: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from South Korea, "Link, Susanne", Ifo Institute, Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, University of Munich, ~, pp.Working Paper No. 146 (2012)
  28. The Primary Classroom: Insights from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ Study, "McCoy, Selina", Economics and Social Research Institute, ~ (2012)
  29. Niederle, Muriel, "Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), pp.1065~1101 (2007)
  30. Nixon, Lucia, "The Educational Attainment of Young Women: Role Model Effects of Female High School Faculty", Demography, 36, pp.185~194 (1999)
  31. Program for International Student Assessment, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2015)
  32. PISA 2015 Technical Report, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2017)
  33. Park, Hyunjoon, "Causal Effects of Single-Sex Schools on College Entrance Exams and College Attendance: Random Assignment in Seoul High Schools", Demography, 50(2), pp.447~469 (2013)
  34. Park, Hyunjoon, "Do Single-sex Schools Enhance Students’ STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Outcomes?", Economics of Education Review, 62, pp.35~47 (2018)
  35. Schneeweis, Nicole, "Girls, Girls, Girls: Gender Composition and Female School Choice", Economics of Education Review, 31(4), pp.482~500 (2012)
  36. Strain, Michael, "Single-sex Classes & Student Outcomes: Evidence from North Carolina", Economics of Education Review, 36, pp.73~87 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)