본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of the Usability and User Experience of the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Mobile Application in Indonesia

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The National Health Insurance (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional or JKN) mobile application represents an administrativetransformation of health social insurance in Indonesia. The application’s user base has quadrupled in the past 2 years. The study aimed to evaluate the usability and user experience of the JKN mobile application in Indonesia. Methods: Thestudy administered an online survey featuring the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire alongside a user experienceassessment. The survey was disseminated via social media and garnered responses from 370 participants. The variables examinedincluded usability and user experience, specifically focusing on attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability,stimulation, and novelty. Data analysis was performed descriptively, and the results were benchmarked. Results: The JKNmobile application had an average SUS score of 60.9 ± 13.47 (adjective rating “good,” Grade “F,” acceptability rating of “lowmarginal,” and a percentile range of 34). User experience testing yielded the following results: attractiveness (1.09 ± 1.09), perspicuity(1.05 ± 1.17), efficiency (1.07 ± 1.20), dependability (1.03 ± 1.12), stimulation (0.88 ± 1.20), and novel-ty (0.58 ± 1.09). The benchmark for the JKN mobile application placed the user experience in the “below average” category. Conclusions: Theevaluation of the usability and user experience of the JKN mobile application was generally positive. However, there is a needto improve the usability and all parameters of the user experience. Broader-scale research is needed to explore the factors thatinfluence usage and user experience to promote the adoption of the JKN application and increase user satisfaction.

Abstract

Objectives: The National Health Insurance (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional or JKN) mobile application represents an administrativetransformation of health social insurance in Indonesia. The application’s user base has quadrupled in the past 2 years. The study aimed to evaluate the usability and user experience of the JKN mobile application in Indonesia. Methods: Thestudy administered an online survey featuring the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire alongside a user experienceassessment. The survey was disseminated via social media and garnered responses from 370 participants. The variables examinedincluded usability and user experience, specifically focusing on attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability,stimulation, and novelty. Data analysis was performed descriptively, and the results were benchmarked. Results: The JKNmobile application had an average SUS score of 60.9 ± 13.47 (adjective rating “good,” Grade “F,” acceptability rating of “lowmarginal,” and a percentile range of 34). User experience testing yielded the following results: attractiveness (1.09 ± 1.09), perspicuity(1.05 ± 1.17), efficiency (1.07 ± 1.20), dependability (1.03 ± 1.12), stimulation (0.88 ± 1.20), and novel-ty (0.58 ± 1.09). The benchmark for the JKN mobile application placed the user experience in the “below average” category. Conclusions: Theevaluation of the usability and user experience of the JKN mobile application was generally positive. However, there is a needto improve the usability and all parameters of the user experience. Broader-scale research is needed to explore the factors thatinfluence usage and user experience to promote the adoption of the JKN application and increase user satisfaction.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Participants of the National Health Insurance Program (Program JKN)" (2023)[URL]
  2. "Access services at your fingertips via JKN Mobil" (2020)[URL]
  3. Bahri S, "Analysis of service quality of the mobile JKN application by the social health insurance organizer using the service quality (Servqual)method", Ind Eng J, 11(2), pp.1~7 (2022)
  4. "Usability 101: introduction to usability" (2012)[URL]
  5. Lewis JR, "The system usability scale : past, present, and future", Int J Hum Comput Interact, 34(7), pp.577~590 (2018)[DOI]
  6. Muro-Culebras A, "Tools for evaluating the content, efficacy, and usability of mobile health apps according to the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments : systematic review", JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 9(12), pp.e15433~ (2021)[DOI]
  7. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, "The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 22(1), pp.22~ (2022)[DOI]
  8. Brooke J, "SUS : a retrospective", J Usabil Stud, 8(2), pp.29~40 (2013)
  9. Weichbroth P, "Usability of mobile applications : a systematic literature study", IEEE Access, 8, pp.55563~55577 (2020)[DOI]
  10. Lobo EH, "Detecting user experience issues from mHealth apps that support stroke caregiver needs : an analysis of user reviews", Front Public Health, 11, pp.1027667~ (2023)[DOI]
  11. Hornbæk K, "Technology acceptance and user experience : a review of the experiential component in HCI", ACM Transact Comput Hum Interact, 24(5), pp.1~30 (2017)[DOI]
  12. Sharp H, "Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction" (2007), John Wiley & Sons
  13. Wulandari R, "Postpartum care behavior improvement during COVID-19 pandemic in indonesia using mobile-health interactive message", Ethiop J Health Sci, 32(2), pp.243~254 (2022)[DOI]
  14. Kushendriawan MA, "Evaluating user experience of a mobile health application halodoc using user experience questionnaire and usability testing", J Sist Inf, 17(1), pp.58~71 (2021)[DOI]
  15. Islam MN, "Investigating usability of mobile health applications in Bangladesh", BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 20(1), pp.19~ (2020)[DOI]
  16. Bangor A, "Determining what individual SUS scores mean : adding an adjective rating scale", J Usabil Stud, 4(3), pp.114~123 (2009)
  17. Santoso HB, "Measuring user experience of the student-centered elearning environment", J Educ Online, 13(1), pp.58~79 (2016)
  18. Laugwitz B, "HCI and usability for education and work", pp.63~67 (2008), Springer
  19. Lewis JR, "Item benchmarks for the system usability scale", J Usabil Stud, 13(3), pp.158~167 (2018)
  20. Parera G, "Usability of JKN mobile application using system usability scale(SUS)method", J Bit-Tech, 5(3), pp.138~145 (2023)[DOI]
  21. Lubs BO, "Evaluation of usability of the mobile JKN application system using the use questionnaire", J Saintekom, 10(1), pp.65~76 (2020)
  22. Annisa N, "Evaluation of the National Health Insurance (JKN) mobile application in Malang City from the usability aspect", J Repos, 2(12), pp.1689~1699 (2020)[DOI]
  23. Wulandari R, "Evaluation of usability and user experience of Oncodoc’s M-health application for early detection of cancer", Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 23(12), pp.4169~4176 (2022)[DOI]
  24. Iskandarsyah A, "Usability and acceptability of JAGA SEHAT : mobile application to improve knowledge about healthy lifestyle", J Multidiscip Healthc, 15, pp.115~124 (2022)[DOI]
  25. Dyayu AL, "Evaluation of the usability of the PeduliLindungi application using usability testing and the system usability scale (SUS) method", J Manaj Teknol Dan Sist Inf, 3(1), pp.395~404 (2023)[DOI]
  26. Oakley-Girvan I, "A novel smartphone application for the informal caregivers of cancer patients : usability study", PLOS Digit Health, 2(3), pp.e0000173~ (2023)[DOI]
  27. Hassenzahl M, "The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness", Int J Hum Comput Interact, 13(4), pp.481~499 (2001)[DOI]
  28. Biduski D, "Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire", Comput Hum Behav, 104, pp.106169~ (2020)[DOI]
  29. Pal S, "Exploring the factors that affect user experience in mobile-health applications : a text-mining and machine-learning approach", J Bus Res, 156, pp.113484~ (2023)[DOI]
  30. Ramachandran A, "Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India : a prospective, parallelgroup, randomised controlled trial", Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 1(3), pp.191~198 (2013)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)