본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인 강점 척도를 기반으로 한 업무 유형에 따른 대표 강점 발현의 차이

Difference of Expressed Character Strengths, the Type of Work : Classification as Per the Korean Strength Scale

채정호|이지은|노재홍|김지은|권예지|나해란
대한불안의학회 (Korean Academy of Anxiety Disorders)|2016.04|대한불안의학회지 (Anxiety and Mood)|제12권 제1호|pp. 13-20

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

긍정심리학Character strengthsPositive psychology사무직 근로자성격 강점생산직 근로자한국인 강점 척도Office workerProduction workerThe Korean Strength Scale
주제분류정신과학

초록

Objective : The purpose of this study was to verify the differences of expressed character strengths graded as per the Korean Strength Scale, based on the type of work. Methods : A total of 2,444 conglomerate workers were classified into two groups: 1,356 office workers and 1,088 production workers. The subjects were examined through a web or mobile application based on the Korean Strength Scale. The Korean Strength Scale consists of a total of four top entries and 25 sub-items with appropriate validity. Results : The difference in the average score of sum of character strengths between the two groups was not significant. In the office worker group, character strengths such as love of learning, creativity, perspective, curiosity, facilitation, judgment and faith had significantly high scores. On the other hands, modesty, hope, gratitude, sincerity, magnanimity and self-regulation were high in the production worker group. The results remained unchanged in additional analysis of covariants as sex, age and education level, except for self-regulation and faith. Conclusion : Our results suggest significant differences in the character strengths between the two types of work; however, the average of sum of character strength score remains unchanged. These results may help to understand differences between work environments and thus help to establish a positive foundation. (Anxiety and Mood 2016;12(1):13-20)

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to verify the differences of expressed character strengths graded as per the Korean Strength Scale, based on the type of work. Methods : A total of 2,444 conglomerate workers were classified into two groups: 1,356 office workers and 1,088 production workers. The subjects were examined through a web or mobile application based on the Korean Strength Scale. The Korean Strength Scale consists of a total of four top entries and 25 sub-items with appropriate validity. Results : The difference in the average score of sum of character strengths between the two groups was not significant. In the office worker group, character strengths such as love of learning, creativity, perspective, curiosity, facilitation, judgment and faith had significantly high scores. On the other hands, modesty, hope, gratitude, sincerity, magnanimity and self-regulation were high in the production worker group. The results remained unchanged in additional analysis of covariants as sex, age and education level, except for self-regulation and faith. Conclusion : Our results suggest significant differences in the character strengths between the two types of work; however, the average of sum of character strength score remains unchanged. These results may help to understand differences between work environments and thus help to establish a positive foundation. (Anxiety and Mood 2016;12(1):13-20)

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Peterson C, "Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification" (2004), American Psychological Association
  2. Martínez-Martí ML, "Character strengths and well-being across the life span: data from a representative sample of Germanspeaking adults living in Switzerland", Front Psychol, 5, pp.1~10 (2014)
  3. Park NS, "Strengths of character and well-being", J Soc Psychol, 23, pp.603~619 (2004)
  4. Keyes CLM, "Toward a science of mental health: positive directions in diagnosis and interventions", pp.45~59 (2002), Oxford University Press
  5. 백유미, "성격 강점이 한우경영인들의 심리특성과 직업의식에 미치는 영향: 경남과 경북지역을 중심으로", 한국환경과학회지, 22(6), pp.779~785 (2013), 한국환경과학회[DOI]
  6. 이용수, "체육전공생의 성격강점과 주관적 안녕감과의 관계", 한국체육학회지, 52(5), pp.307~318 (2013), 한국체육학회
  7. Moon Y, "The influence of personality style on life satisfaction of middle aged", Korean J Couns Psychother, 2, pp.29~46 (2002)
  8. 정영은, "한국인 강점 척도의 개발 및 타당화", 대한불안의학회지, 9(1), pp.45~53 (2013), 대한불안의학회
  9. Seligman MEP, "Values In Action (VIA) classification of character strength", Ricerche di Picologia, 27, pp.63~78 (2004)
  10. Kwon SM, "Character strengths test" (2010), Hakjisa
  11. Bohn JJ, "Korean standard classification of occupations" (2007), Korea national statistical office
  12. Park NS, "Character strengths in fifty four nations and the fifty US states", J Posit Psychol, 1, pp.119~129 (2006)
  13. Shimai S, "Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese young adults", J Happiness Stud, 7, pp.311~322 (2006)
  14. 윤성민, "한국 수도권 중년여성들의 성격적 강점과 행복과의 관계", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24(1), pp.27~49 (2012), 한국상담심리학회
  15. 김성숙, "An analysis of the relationship between pre-service early childhood teachers’ character strengths and their happiness", Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 32(4), pp.35~53 (2012), The Korean Society for Early Childhood Education[DOI]
  16. 유동인, "VIA 분류체계에 근거한 보디빌딩 선수의 성격 강점: 자기 및 주요타자의 지각", 한국체육학회지, 52(1), pp.175~183 (2013), 한국체육학회
  17. 박미하, "기독대학생과 일반대학생의 성격강점이 우울과 불안에 미치는 영향", 복음과 상담, 19, pp.125~156 (2012), 한국복음주의상담학회[DOI]
  18. Berthold Anne, "Satisfaction with life and character strengths of non-religious and religious people: it’s practicing one’s religion that makes the difference", Front Psychol, 5, pp.876~ (2014)
  19. Hur SO, "The assessment of stress between white and blue collar workers by using psychosocial wellbeing Index", Korean J Preventive Medi, 29, pp.609~616 (1996)
  20. 김순경, "사무직과 생산직 근로자의 영양실태 비교 및 건강 관련 요인 분석", 대한영양사협회 학술지, 9(4), pp.326~335 (2003), 대한영양사협회
  21. Proyer RT, "Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: a randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for signature strengths vs. a lesser strengths-intervention", Front Psychol, 6, pp.456~ (2015)
  22. Jaser SS, "Development of a positive psychology intervention to improve adherence in adolescents with type 1 diabetes", J Pediatr Health Care, 28, pp.478~485 (2014)
  23. Hanks RA, "Role of character strengths in outcome after mild complicated to severe traumatic brain injury: a positive psychology study", Arch Phys Med Rehab, 95, pp.2096~2012 (2014)
  24. Gander F, "The good character at work: an initial study on the contribution of character strengths in identifying healthy and unhealthy work-related behavior and experience pat-terns", Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 85, pp.859~904 (2012)
  25. Harzer C, "The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction", Front Psychol, 6, pp.165~ (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

연령대별 성격강점의 발달모형: 한국인의 연령집단에 따른 성격강점 비교 및 문화적 특성김지영한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2019 · 제24권 제3호강점의 군집유형에 따른 행복과 우울의 차이김지영한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2018 · 제23권 제3호정신건강의학과 의사를 대상으로 한 긍정성 증진을 위한 단기 성격 강점 워크숍의 효과권예지, 노재홍, 백경희, 이지은, 채정호대한불안의학회 · 대한불안의학회지2015 · 제11권 제2호성격강점과 정신적 웰빙의 관계임영진한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2012 · 제31권 제3호성격강점의 상위덕목이 우울에 미치는 영향과 자기자비의 조절효과에 관한 연구조현석한국임상심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제2023 · 제9권 제4호청소년용 한국인 강점 척도의 개발 및 타당화박주언, 이지은, 정영은, 채정호대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2016 · 제55권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

긍정사고가 주요우울장애와 공황장애의 치료 반응에 미치는 영향에 대한 예비연구임세원, 신영철, 정진이, 하주원, 김은진, 신동원, 오강섭pp. 1-6조현병 환자에서 불안자극에 대한 선택적 주의 편향과 환청과의 연관성 : 예비 연구이경욱, 김태원, 정종현, 채정호, 홍승철, 엄유현, 임현국, 김한석, 서호준, 한진희pp. 7-12우울증 환자에서 외상 사건 경험과 주관적 수면 문제의 특성김민섭, 채정호, 허휴정pp. 21-27소방공무원의 탄력성과 외상후성장이 외상후스트레스 증상에 미치는 영향원성두, 채정호, 박주언, 정영은pp. 28-33우울 및 불안장애 환자에서 신체 통증과 관련된 인지정서조절전략황지현, 채정호, 태혜진, 권예지, 허휴정pp. 34-41
원문 보기