본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Gravity with Intermediate Goods Trade

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This paper derives the gravity equation with intermediate goods trade. We extend a standard monopolistic competition model to incorporate intermediate goods trade, and show that the gravity equation with intermediates trade is identical to the one without it except in that gross output should be used as the output measure instead of value added. We also show that the output elasticity of trade is significantly underestimated when value added is used as the output measure. This implies that with the conventional gravity equation, the contribution of output growth can be substantially underestimated and the role of trade costs reduction can be exaggerated in explaining trade expansion, as we demonstrate for the case of Korea’s trade growth between 1995 and 2007.

Abstract

This paper derives the gravity equation with intermediate goods trade. We extend a standard monopolistic competition model to incorporate intermediate goods trade, and show that the gravity equation with intermediates trade is identical to the one without it except in that gross output should be used as the output measure instead of value added. We also show that the output elasticity of trade is significantly underestimated when value added is used as the output measure. This implies that with the conventional gravity equation, the contribution of output growth can be substantially underestimated and the role of trade costs reduction can be exaggerated in explaining trade expansion, as we demonstrate for the case of Korea’s trade growth between 1995 and 2007.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Aichele, R., "Where is the Value Added? China’s WTO Entry, Trade and Value Chains", Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2014: Evidenzbasierte irtschaftspolitik-Session: China’s Growing Role in World Trade, (E12-V3) (2014)
  2. Anderson, J. E., "How Much Does Geography Deflect Services Trade? Canadian Answers", International Economic Review, 55(3), pp.791~818 (2014)
  3. Anderson, J. E., "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.170~192 (2003)
  4. Baier, S. L., "The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transportation Costs, and Income Similarity", Journal of International Economics, 53(1), pp.1~27 (2001)
  5. Trade Effects of the Euro: Evidence from Sectoral Data, "Baldwin, R. E.", ECB, ~, pp.ECB Working Paper, no. 446 (2005)
  6. Gravity Chains: Estimating Bilateral Trade Flows When Parts and Components Trade is Important, "Baldwin, R.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 16672 (2011)
  7. Bridgman, B, "The Rise of Vertical Specialization Trade", Journal of International Economics, 86(1), pp.133~140 (2012)
  8. The Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural?, "Constantinescu, C.", IMF, ~, pp.IMF Working Paper, no. 15 (2015), 6
  9. Chaney, T, "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade", American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1707~1721 (2008)
  10. Eaton, J., "Technology, Geography, and Trade", Econometrica, 70(5), pp.1741~1779 (2002)
  11. Estevadeordal, A., "The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), pp.359~407 (2003)
  12. Evans, C. L, "The Economic Significance of National Border Effects", American Economic Review, 93(4), pp.1291~1312 (2003)
  13. Feenstra, R. C., "Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among the Alternative Theories of Trade", Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2), pp.430~447 (2001)
  14. Head, K., "The Erosion of Colonial Trade Linkages after Independence", Journal of International Economics, 81(1), pp.1~14 (2010)
  15. Head, K., "Handbook of International Economics, vol. 4" (2014), Elsevier
  16. Hummels, D., "The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade", Journal of International Economics, 54(1), pp.75~96 (2001)
  17. Jang, S., "Vertical Specialization and Gravity Equation Estimation", Master, pp.2014
  18. Johnson, R. C., "Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added", Journal of International Economics, 86(2), pp.224~236 (2012)
  19. Koopman, R., "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports", American Economic Review, 104(2), pp.459~494 (2014)
  20. Krugman, P. R, "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade", Journal of International Economics, 9(4), pp.469~479 (1979)
  21. Krugman, P., "Integration, Specialization, and Adjustment", European Economic Review, 40(3-5), pp.959~967 (1996)
  22. Novy, D, "Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data", Economic Inquiry, 51(1), pp.101~121 (2013)
  23. Rauch, J. E, "Networks versus Markets in International Trade", Journal of International Economics, 48(1), pp.7~37 (1999)
  24. Saito, M, "Armington Elasticities in Intermediate Inputs Trade: A Problem in Using Multilateral Trade Data", Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(4), pp.1097~1117 (2004)
  25. Timmer, M. P., "An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production", Review of International Economics, 23(3), pp.575~605 (2015)
  26. Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration?, "Wei, S. -J", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 5531 (1996)
  27. Yi, K. -M, "Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?", Journal of Political Economy, 111(1), pp.52~102 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)