본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Does Specialization Matter for Trade Imbalance at Industry Level?

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This paper investigates the source of bilateral trade imbalance at industry level. We build a simple model based on gravity theory and derive the prediction that the bilateral trade balance in an industry is increasing in the difference between trading partners in the output share of the industry. We test this prediction and find that the difference in industry share is highly significant in predicting both the sign and the magnitude of trade balance at industry level. We also find that FTAs tend to enlarge trade imbalance at industry level. However, the overall predictive power of the model is rather limited, suggesting that factors other than production specialization are important in determining trade balance at industry level. Another finding of the paper is that the influence of the difference in industry share on trade balance increases as we move to industries that produce more homogeneous products. This finding calls into question monopolistic competition as the main driver of gravity in international trade.

Abstract

This paper investigates the source of bilateral trade imbalance at industry level. We build a simple model based on gravity theory and derive the prediction that the bilateral trade balance in an industry is increasing in the difference between trading partners in the output share of the industry. We test this prediction and find that the difference in industry share is highly significant in predicting both the sign and the magnitude of trade balance at industry level. We also find that FTAs tend to enlarge trade imbalance at industry level. However, the overall predictive power of the model is rather limited, suggesting that factors other than production specialization are important in determining trade balance at industry level. Another finding of the paper is that the influence of the difference in industry share on trade balance increases as we move to industries that produce more homogeneous products. This finding calls into question monopolistic competition as the main driver of gravity in international trade.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Anderson, J. E, "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.170~192 (2003)
  2. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations, "Baldwin, R", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.Working Paper 12516 (2006)
  3. Bernard, A. B, "Comparative Advantages and Heterogeneous Firms", Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), pp.31~66 (2007)
  4. Caves, R. E., "Intra-Industry Trade and Market Structure in the Industrial Countries", Oxford Economic Papers, 33(2), pp.203~223 (1981)
  5. Chaney, T., "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade", American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1707~1721 (2008)
  6. Chung, "Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting Korea’s Trade Structure and Current Account, in Korean, Research Report 08-07", Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, ~ (2008)
  7. Davis, D. R., "The Mystery of the Excess Trade (Balances)", American Economic Review, 92(2), pp.170~174 (2002)
  8. Debaere, P., "Monopolistic Competition and Trade, Revisited: Testing the Model without Testing for Gravity", Journal of International Economics, 66(1), pp.249~266 (2005)
  9. Evans, C. L., "The Economic Significance of National Border Effects", American Economic Review, 93(4), pp.1291~1312 (2003)
  10. Feenstra, R. C., "Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate among the Alternative. Theories of Trade", Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2), pp.430~447 (2001)
  11. Greenaway, D., "Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade: A Cross Industry Analysis for the United Kingdom", Economic Journal, 105(433), pp.1505~1518 (1995)
  12. Harrigan, J., "Openness to Trade in Manufactures in the OECD", Journal of International Economics, 40(1-2), pp.23~39 (1996)
  13. Helpman, E., "Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from fourteen Industrial Countries", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1(1), pp.62~81 (1987)
  14. Hummels, D, "Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), pp.799~836 (1995)
  15. Melitz, M. J., "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity", Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695~1725 (2003)
  16. Rauch, J. E., "Networks versus Markets in International Trade", Journal of International Economics, 48(1), pp.7~35 (1999)
  17. Rose, A. K., "Do WTO Members Have More Liberal Trade Policy?", Journal of International Economics, 63(2), pp.209~235 (2004)
  18. Song, E. Y., "On Gravity, Specialization and Intra-industry Trade", Review of International Economics, 19(3), pp.494~508 (2011)
  19. Song, E. Y, "Intra-industry Trade and Industry Distribution of Productivity: A Cournot-Ricardo Approach", World Economy, 35(4), pp.461~482 (2012)
  20. Toh, K., "A Cross-Section Analysis of Intra-Industry Trade in U.S. Manufacturing Industries", Review of World Economics(Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 118(2), pp.281~301 (1982)
  21. Zhao, C, "Does Specialization Matter in Determining Trade Imbalance at Industry Level?" (2009), Sogang University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)