Long-run Effects of the Korea-China Free-Trade Agreement
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper uses a 53-country 15-industry computable general equilibrium model of trade to analyze the effects of the Korea-China free trade agreement on the Korean economy, the manufacturing sector in particular. The model is based on Yaylaci and Shikher (2014) which uses the Eaton-Kortum methodology to explain intra-industry trade. The model predicts that the Korea-China FTA will increase Korea-China manufacturing trade by 56%, manufacturing employment in Korea by 5.7% and China by 0.55%. The model also predicts significant reallocation of employment across industries with the Food industry in Korea losing jobs and other industries there gaining jobs, with the Medical equipment industry gaining the most. There will be some trade diversion from the ASEAN countries, as well as Japan and the United States.
Abstract
This paper uses a 53-country 15-industry computable general equilibrium model of trade to analyze the effects of the Korea-China free trade agreement on the Korean economy, the manufacturing sector in particular. The model is based on Yaylaci and Shikher (2014) which uses the Eaton-Kortum methodology to explain intra-industry trade. The model predicts that the Korea-China FTA will increase Korea-China manufacturing trade by 56%, manufacturing employment in Korea by 5.7% and China by 0.55%. The model also predicts significant reallocation of employment across industries with the Food industry in Korea losing jobs and other industries there gaining jobs, with the Medical equipment industry gaining the most. There will be some trade diversion from the ASEAN countries, as well as Japan and the United States.
참고문헌 (15)
- Anderson, J. E, "Trade costs", Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), pp.691~751 (2004)
- Armington, P. S, "A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production", IMF Staff Papers, 16(1), pp.159~178 (1969)
- Costinot, A., "Handbook of International Economics. vol. 4" (2014), North Holland
- Eaton, J, "Technology, geography, and trade", Econometrica, 70(5), pp.1741~1779 (2002)
- Eaton, J, "Putting Ricardo to work", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), pp.65~89 (2012)
- Kortum, S. S, "Research, patenting, and technological change", Econometrica, 65(6), pp.1389~1419 (1997)
- Lee, J, "Constructing tariff database from HS code for the Korea-China FTA", KIET Policy Document no. 2013-180, ~ (2013)
- 임재규, "한국의 자유무역협정(FTA) 확대로 인한 경제적 파급효과", 국제통상연구, 16(1), pp.63~102 (2011), 한국국제통상학회
- 박윤환, "한·중 FTA 협상에 따른 공산품의 민감품목과 관심품목 추정에 관한 연구", 국제통상연구, 17(4), pp.33~59 (2012), 한국국제통상학회
- Shikher, S, "Capital, technology, and specialization in the neoclassical model", Journal of International Economics, 83(2), pp.229~242 (2011)
- Shikher, S, "Predicting the effects of NAFTA: Now we can do it better!", Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 5(2), pp.32~59 (2012)
- Shikher, S, "Putting industries into the Eaton Kortum model", Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 21(6), pp.807~837 (2012)
- Waugh, M, "International trade and income differences", American Economic Review, 100(5), pp.2093~2124 (2010)
- Yaylaci, O, "Evolution of trade costs", pp.2012
- Ozlem Yaylaci, "What Would Korea-US Free Trade Agreement Bring?", International Economic Journal, 28(1), pp.161~182 (2014), 한국국제경제학회