맞춤형방문건강관리사업의 지역사회 네트워크 탐색
Network Analysis to Describe Service Link for Customized Visiting Health Care Program
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The nurse visiting health service named Customized Visiting Health Care Program(CVHCP) requires the service innovations incorporating community support into a local service network. The purpose of this study was to assess the community network in CVHCP and inform improvement in this network. Methods: We used Social Network Analysis(SNA) in one CVHCP at H city. Network links were generated by self-administered questionnaires by the 14 community resource centers who quantified their links to all other 25 agents on the list. Links were analyzed by a dichotomous scale for any experience of collaboration and a scored scale of 0 to 3 for level of collaboration using UCINET v6. Results: A list of 14 agents was generated, and local network was dominated by the Public Health Center and a local welfare center named Unlimited Care Center(UCC). According to centrality score, UCC was the most prominent agent, and Public Health Center was the most influential agent, being a link in the pathway flow between other agents for 9.5% of contribution. CVHCP scored lower rank of prominent with 30.8% of other agents reported referring to it. Conclusions: Social network analysis provides a useful network description for informing and evaluation service network improvement in maximizing its service for the CVHCP.
Abstract
Objectives: The nurse visiting health service named Customized Visiting Health Care Program(CVHCP) requires the service innovations incorporating community support into a local service network. The purpose of this study was to assess the community network in CVHCP and inform improvement in this network. Methods: We used Social Network Analysis(SNA) in one CVHCP at H city. Network links were generated by self-administered questionnaires by the 14 community resource centers who quantified their links to all other 25 agents on the list. Links were analyzed by a dichotomous scale for any experience of collaboration and a scored scale of 0 to 3 for level of collaboration using UCINET v6. Results: A list of 14 agents was generated, and local network was dominated by the Public Health Center and a local welfare center named Unlimited Care Center(UCC). According to centrality score, UCC was the most prominent agent, and Public Health Center was the most influential agent, being a link in the pathway flow between other agents for 9.5% of contribution. CVHCP scored lower rank of prominent with 30.8% of other agents reported referring to it. Conclusions: Social network analysis provides a useful network description for informing and evaluation service network improvement in maximizing its service for the CVHCP.
참고문헌 (28)
- Barabási, A. L, "Linked: the new science of networks", American Journal of Physics, 71(4), pp.409~ (2003)
- Butterfoss, F. D, "Coalitions and partnerships in community health" (2007), Jossey-Bass
- Christakis, N. A, "The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years", New England Journal of Medicine, 357, pp.370~379 (2007)
- Christakis, N. A, "The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network", New England Journal of Medicine, 358, pp.2249~2258 (2008)
- Freeman, L. C, "Research methods in social network analysis" (1989), George Mason University
- Fuller, J. D, "Use of social network analysis to describe service links for farmer's mental health", Australian Journal of Rural Health, 15, pp.99~106 (2007)
- Fuller, J. D, "Service network analysis for agricultural mental health", BMC Health Service Research, 9(87), pp.1~8 (2009)
- "Introduction of unlimited care center" (2008)[URL]
- Ham, C. H, "Attitudes toward care management as connecting framework of healthcare and social work within local community", Studies on Older Welfare, 13, pp.233~282 (2001)
- Hawe, P, "A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis", Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, pp.971~975 (2004)
- 정민수, "지역사회역량이 주민 건강수준에 미치는 영향-2006년 서울시 도봉구 주민 건강행태조사를 중심으로-", 보건과 사회과학, 22(22), pp.153~182 (2007), 한국보건사회학회
- 정민수, "<종설> 지역사회 기반 참여연구 방법론", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 25(1), pp.83~104 (2008), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- 정민수, "지역사회 기반 조직을 이용한 지역사회역량의 측정과 건강증진 기획 -서울시 S구를 중심으로-", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 26(3), pp.35~48 (2009), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- Keating, N. L, "Minimal social network effects evident in cancer screening behavior", Cancer, 117, pp.3045~3052 (2011)
- Kim, J. K, "Theoretical review on government-NGO relationship: Perspectives on resource-reliance model", Korean Journal of Social Policy, 2, pp.5~28 (2000)
- Kitchovitch, S, "Community structure in social networks: Applications for epidemiological modelling", PLoS One, 6(7), pp.22220~ (2011)[DOI]
- Knoke, D, "Network analysis" (1982), Sage Publications
- Knoke D, "Social network analysis" (2008), Sage Publications
- Integration of community health services based on the clients' needs. Korean Health Promotion Foundation Research Report, "Lee, I. S", College of Nursing, Seoul National University, ~ (2003)
- 이석민, "사회서비스사업에 대한 ‘프로그램 이론주도 평가모형’의 적용에 관한 연구 - 맞춤형 방문건강관리사업을 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 19(3), pp.315~344 (2010), 한국정책학회
- Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Guide for customized health management program" (2011), Korea Health Promotion Foundation
- 박지은, "자원봉사 연계 유무에 따른 방문보건 노인대상자의 건강상태, 삶의 질 및 맞춤형 방문건강관리서비스 만족도", 지역사회간호학회지, 21(4), pp.448~457 (2010), 지역사회간호학회
- Powell, W. W, "Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization", Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, pp.295~336 (1990)
- Provan, K, "The use of social network analysis to strengthen community partnerships", Public Administration Review, 65, pp.603~613 (2005)
- Scott, J, "Social network analysis" (2010), SAGE Publications
- 서영준, "(사례보고) 보건소 부서간 건강증진사업 연계실태 평가", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 24(2), pp.111~121 (2007), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- Valente, T. W, "A network assessment of community-based participatory research: linking communities and universities to reduce cancer disparities", American Journal of Public Health, 100, pp.1319~1325 (2010)
- 유승현, "지역사회 건강증진 협력 개발 연구의 지향 과제", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 26(4), pp.85~92 (2009), 한국보건교육건강증진학회