근대일본과 미크로네시아* - 문화교섭의 관점에서 -
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Micronesian islands became regions that Japan mandated since World War I. Afterwards, Micronesian islands kept existing as a military base on the Pacific Ocean in modern Japan. Micronesian islands that had disappeared from the memory of the majority of modern Japanese were symbolic regions that the continental expansion of empire Japan for a certain period of time. The purpose of this thesis is to research the relation between modern Japan and Micronesia. There were a lot of personal exchanges after having decided Japan to mandate though it was natural. Yanaihara Tadao, Nakajima Atsusi and Ishikawa Tatsuzou were such people whom this thesis took up. I want to think about the meaning of a cultural exchange of Micronesia and modern Japan in the thesis through the analysis of their remarks. After World War II, Micronesia became a mandate territory from Japanese territory to the United States. As a result, Micronesia was forgotten from among the memory of a lot of Japanese. When thinking about the problem of the war responsibility, Micronesian islands did not become the objects. The purpose of this thesis is to reflect on our outlook on the world and outlook on the civilization by clarifying the historical experience in Micronesia with modern Japan.
Abstract
Micronesian islands became regions that Japan mandated since World War I. Afterwards, Micronesian islands kept existing as a military base on the Pacific Ocean in modern Japan. Micronesian islands that had disappeared from the memory of the majority of modern Japanese were symbolic regions that the continental expansion of empire Japan for a certain period of time. The purpose of this thesis is to research the relation between modern Japan and Micronesia. There were a lot of personal exchanges after having decided Japan to mandate though it was natural. Yanaihara Tadao, Nakajima Atsusi and Ishikawa Tatsuzou were such people whom this thesis took up. I want to think about the meaning of a cultural exchange of Micronesia and modern Japan in the thesis through the analysis of their remarks. After World War II, Micronesia became a mandate territory from Japanese territory to the United States. As a result, Micronesia was forgotten from among the memory of a lot of Japanese. When thinking about the problem of the war responsibility, Micronesian islands did not become the objects. The purpose of this thesis is to reflect on our outlook on the world and outlook on the civilization by clarifying the historical experience in Micronesia with modern Japan.
참고문헌 (24)
- 浅田喬二, "日本植民地史論", pp.6~56 (1990), 未来社
- 川村湊, "無文字社会の誘い In 中島敦", pp.71~80 (1992), 双文社
- 川村湊, "大衆オリエンタリズムとアジア認識 In 岩波講座 近代日本と植民地 7", pp.107~136 (1993), 岩波書店
- 川村湊, "南洋․樺太の日本文学", pp.59~166 (1994), 筑摩書房
- 川村湊, "大東亜民俗学の虚実", pp.142~197 (1996), 講談社メチエ選書
- 川田順造, "無文字社会の歴史", pp.1~34 (1976), 岩波書店
- 後藤乾一, "近代日本と東南アジア", pp.1~38 (1995), 岩波書店
- 清水元, "アジア海人の思想と行動", pp.85~118 (1997), NTT出版
- 矢野暢, "南進の系譜", pp.47~78 (1975), 中公新書
- 矢野暢, "日本の南洋史観", pp.79~107 (1979), 中公新書
- 이승원, "세계로 떠난 조선의 지식인들", pp.167~192 (2009), 휴머니스트출판그룹
- 今泉裕美子, "ミクロネシア", 歴史評論, (508) (1992)
- 今泉裕美子, "南洋群島委任統治政策の形成 In 岩波講座 近代日本と植民地 4", pp.51~81 (1993), 岩波書店
- 今泉裕美子, "南洋庁の公学校教育方針と教育の実体", 沖縄文化研究 (1996)
- 佐伯康子, "松江春次論南洋興発の発掘と崩壊", 名古屋明徳短期大学紀要, (3) (1992)
- 隅谷三喜男, "解説矢内原忠雄 In 帝国主義下の台湾", pp.285~303 (1988), 岩波書店
- 千住一, "ミクロネシアおよび南洋群島表象の歴史的変遷", 島嶼研究, (3) (2002)
- 等松春夫, "南洋群島委任統治継続をめぐる国際環境", 国際政治 (1999)
- 等松春夫, "日本の国際連盟脱退と南洋群島委任統治問題をめぐる論争", 早稲田大学大学院法研論集, (66) (1993)
- Mark Robert Peattie, "日本植民地支配下のミクロネシア In 岩波講座 近代日本と植民地 1", pp.189~215 (1992), 岩波書店
- 村上勝彦, "矢内原忠雄における植民地論と植民政策 In 岩波講座 近代日本と植民地 4", pp.205~237 (1993), 岩波書店
- 森久男, "解説鈴木常勲 In 南洋探検実記", pp.255~286 (1980), 平凡社
- 我部政明, "日本のミクロネシア占領と南進", 慶應大学法学研究 (1982)
- 박광현, "나카지마 아쓰시 문학의 타자 체험", 동서비교문학저널, (13), pp.75~98 (2005), 한국동서비교문학학회
