제국 일본의 ‘다이쵸사부’(大調査部)의 <중국농촌관행조사>의 조사 실태와 효과*
The Investigative Conditions and Effects of Rural Customs and Practices of China of China of the ‘Great Research Wing’ in ‘Teikoku Nihon(帝國日本)’
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ‘Great Research Wing’(大調査部) of the Mantetsu(滿鐵) were established in April 1939. The ultimate Purpose was to set up the new Order in East Asian Region under Japanese Empire. This Essay is prepared to study the investigative Conditions and Effects of Rural Customs and Practices of China of the ‘Great Research Wing’. First of all, we surveyed the main Concepts and Categories of Rural Customs and Practices of China. As is generally known, the Research Group Called the China as Sina. One of the main Concepts was the Rural ‘Customs and Practices’. The Concept was academic on the Surface and connected with Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, but was actually based upon a premise of Japanese Empire and War. Reality was different from Ideals. Next, Checklists to Investigate and the Survey Method were considerably scientific. Tōa Kenkyūjo in Tokyo and Mantetsu Research Wing had have the different Checklists. That was the difference of the Planner and the working Group. They had put in the final Checklist the Cooperation, Class Analysis, and public Security, and everything else. It was linked with Japanese intellectual Flows at that Times. And the Rural Customs and Practices of China(中國農村慣行調査) was published in very different social Condition.
Abstract
The ‘Great Research Wing’(大調査部) of the Mantetsu(滿鐵) were established in April 1939. The ultimate Purpose was to set up the new Order in East Asian Region under Japanese Empire. This Essay is prepared to study the investigative Conditions and Effects of Rural Customs and Practices of China of the ‘Great Research Wing’. First of all, we surveyed the main Concepts and Categories of Rural Customs and Practices of China. As is generally known, the Research Group Called the China as Sina. One of the main Concepts was the Rural ‘Customs and Practices’. The Concept was academic on the Surface and connected with Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, but was actually based upon a premise of Japanese Empire and War. Reality was different from Ideals. Next, Checklists to Investigate and the Survey Method were considerably scientific. Tōa Kenkyūjo in Tokyo and Mantetsu Research Wing had have the different Checklists. That was the difference of the Planner and the working Group. They had put in the final Checklist the Cooperation, Class Analysis, and public Security, and everything else. It was linked with Japanese intellectual Flows at that Times. And the Rural Customs and Practices of China(中國農村慣行調査) was published in very different social Condition.
참고문헌 (17)
- 松村高夫, "滿鐵の調査と硏究-その「神話」と實像", pp.80~ (2008), 靑木書店
- 中國農村慣行調査刊行會, "中國農村慣行調査 第1卷", pp.1~ (1952), 岩波書店
- 中國農村慣行調査刊行會, "中國農村慣行調査 第6卷", pp.546~ (1958), 岩波書店
- 山田豪一, "滿鐵調査部-榮光と挫折の四十年" (1977), 日本經濟新聞社
- 小島晋治, "20世紀の中國硏究 : その遺産をどう生かすか", pp.81~ (2001), 硏文出版
- 헤닝 엥겔른, "인간, 우리는 누구인가?", pp.77~ (2010), 을유문화사
- 이종욱, "춘추 : 신라의 피, 한국⋅한국인을 만들다", pp.16~ (2009), 효형출판
- 김주영, "객주 개정판 9권", pp.177~ (1992), 창작과비평사
- 朴賢洙, "日帝의 식민지 調査機構와 調査者", 정신문화연구, 72, pp.6~ (1998)
- 최석영, "일제 하 곤와지로(今和次郞)의 조선 민가(民家) 조사방법과 인식 ― 『朝鮮部落調査特別報告 第1冊ㆍ民家』의 분석을 중심으로 ―", 사림, (35), pp.191~229 (2010), 수선사학회
- 최정호, "복에 관한 담론-기복사상과 한국의 기층문화" (2010), 돌베개
- 최상일, "사라져가는 옛 삶의 기록, 최상일 PD의 산간민속 답사기 1 백두대간 민속기행", MBC프로덕션, 5~ (2009)
- 末廣 昭, "岩波講座「帝國」 日本の學知 第6卷 地域硏究としてのアジア" (2006), 岩波書店
- 蘭林友, "廟無尋處-華北滿鐵調査村落的人類學再硏究", pp.4~ (2007), 黑龍江人民出版社
- 백지운, "동아시아의 지역질서-제국을 넘어 공동체로", pp.152~153 (2005), 창비
- 井村哲郞, "滿鐵調査部-關係者の證言" (1966), アジア經濟硏究所
- 黃興濤, "淸末民國社會調査與現代社會科學興起", pp.1~3 (2008), 福建敎育出版社
