한중 원격의료 정책비교 및 원격의료 발전 방안
Comparison of Telemedicine Policy and Development of Telemedicine in Korea and China
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to COVID-19, the non-face-to-face era has arrived, and telemedicine has become a demand of the times in the medical community. Accordingly, this study aims to present a way to supplement Korea's telemedicine policy by comparing and analyzing domestic telemedicine policy and China's telemedicine policy, and analyzing the success factors of Chinese telemedicine. Domestic and foreign literature was explored to compare and analyze telemedicine policy cases of Korean, Chinese. Domestic and foreign national legal databases and web DBs were used, and literature were restricted between 2009 and 2022. Prior to COVID-19, the scope of telemedicine was very narrow in Korea, and only some pilot projects were operated. After COVID-19, the scope of telemedicine temporarily expanded, but no specific policies or systems were prepared. On the other hand, in the case of China, related policy institutional discussions on telemedicine have been actively conducted since the past, and accordingly, specific scope of application and related management norms and systems have been prepared. For the development of telemedicine in Korea, it is necessary to supplement the definition of telemedicine, ensure the accuracy and safety of non-face-to-face care through telemedicine, and solve the concentration phenomenon of large hospitals through limited conditions for hospital-level medical institutions.
Abstract
Due to COVID-19, the non-face-to-face era has arrived, and telemedicine has become a demand of the times in the medical community. Accordingly, this study aims to present a way to supplement Korea's telemedicine policy by comparing and analyzing domestic telemedicine policy and China's telemedicine policy, and analyzing the success factors of Chinese telemedicine. Domestic and foreign literature was explored to compare and analyze telemedicine policy cases of Korean, Chinese. Domestic and foreign national legal databases and web DBs were used, and literature were restricted between 2009 and 2022. Prior to COVID-19, the scope of telemedicine was very narrow in Korea, and only some pilot projects were operated. After COVID-19, the scope of telemedicine temporarily expanded, but no specific policies or systems were prepared. On the other hand, in the case of China, related policy institutional discussions on telemedicine have been actively conducted since the past, and accordingly, specific scope of application and related management norms and systems have been prepared. For the development of telemedicine in Korea, it is necessary to supplement the definition of telemedicine, ensure the accuracy and safety of non-face-to-face care through telemedicine, and solve the concentration phenomenon of large hospitals through limited conditions for hospital-level medical institutions.
참고문헌 (27)
- "Article 49 of the Infectious Disease Prevention and Management Act", ~
- "Article 75 of the Infectious Disease Prevention and Management Act", ~
- "Paragraph 2 of article 79 of the Infectious Disease Prevention and Management Act", ~
- Choi YS, "Digital Healthcare : The Future of Healthcare" (2020), Cloudnine
- 백경희, "펜데믹(Pandemic) 기간 동안의 원격의료 허용 여부 및 그 범위에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 48, pp.341~369 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
- Manocchia A, "Telehealth: Enhancing Care through Technology", R I Medical Journal, 103(1), pp.18~20 (2020)
- 황원재, "해외환자에 대한 원격의료의 허용 가능성", 소비자법연구, 6(2), pp.27~52 (2020), 한국소비자법학회[DOI]
- "3.5 million non-face-to-face treatments over two years, 43.7 billion won in medical expenses...Internal medicine, general medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine"[URL]
- 심채영, "원격의료 도입에 대한 한의사의 인식", 대한예방한의학회지, 25(3), pp.1~14 (2021), 대한예방한의학회[DOI]
- 김미경, "산업혁신체제 관점에서의 중국의 원격의료 산업 분석과 국내로의 함의점 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 21(3), pp.441~453 (2021), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- "Article 34 (1) of the Medical Service Act", ~
- "Ministry of Health and Welfare Announcement No. 2020-177", ~
- "Article 49-3 of the Infection Law Prevention Act", ~
- "Ministry of Health and Welfare Announcement No. 2022-228", ~
- National Health Commisiion of the PRC, "Opinions on the promotion of telemedicine services in medical institutions", ~ (2014)
- The State Council of the People's Republic of China, "Guidance opinions on the active promotion of Internet + action", ~ (2015)
- General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, "Internet+ Opinions of the State Council Panel on the Promotion of Medical Health Development", ~ (2018)
- China National Medical Security Administration, "Opinions on the promotion of 'Internet+' medical insurance services during the COVID-19 quarantine period", ~ (2020)
- A Comparative Study on Telemedicine Policies in Major Countries from the Perspective of Medical Consumers, "Kim MA", Korea Consumer Agency, 1~131 (2018)
- "The introduction of the first Koreanl medical telemedicine system in Dangjin-si"[URL]
- "Digital network health care service for residents in vulnerable areas (Gangwon-do)" (2019)[URL]
- "Hwasun-gun operates a "non-face-to-face Korean medicine treatment"service for the vulnerable"[URL]
- "Ministry of Health and Welfare Announcement No. 2022-235", ~
- Jang SB, "Telemedicine and the use of Korean medicine for patients with COVID-19 in South Korea: observational study", JMIR public health and surveillance, 7(1), pp.e20236~ (2021)
- "Introduction to the COVID-19 Koreanl Medical Treatment Center project of the Korean Medical Association"[URL]
- "Medical consumers in non-face-to-face treatment, "Didn't you already have a positive experience?""[URL]
- "The physician surveys the pros and cons of 'non-face-to-face treatment'...""Set policy direction as a result""[URL]