본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

건강증진 연구방법의 현황과 과제 : 한국건강증진재단 연구과제(2005-2011년)를 중심으로

Current Status and Challenges of Research Methology for Health Promotion Research: Focusing on Research Funded by the Korea Health Promotion Foundation, 2005-2011

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: To investigate the current status and challenges of research methodology for health promotion research (HPR), this study analyzed HPR funded by the Korea Health Promotion Foundation (KHPF) from 2005 to 2011. Methods: All of the research reports funded by the KHPF for the period were included in this study. From the literature reviewed, a framework of this study was developed. Results: Quantitative research was 67.7%. The most common quantitative research design was cross-sectional survey (46.6%). Only 7.3% of quantitative research employed theoretical frameworks, and more than a half (53.4%) used primary data. For qualitative research (2.8%), most cases were conducted together with quantitative research. No qualitative research employed a philosophical underpinning. Only 7.0% of research received consent form, and 2.1% was approved by institutional review board. The results of this study indicate that there is a need to employ various research methods to study key concepts of HPR more in-depth. Efforts should be made to reduce statistical errors and also employ newly introduced statistical methods. Conclusions: Overall, a lack of scientific evidence from the HPR reports analyzed in this study was observed. Therefore, the KHPF and the academia should work together to solve the problems indicated from this study.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the current status and challenges of research methodology for health promotion research (HPR), this study analyzed HPR funded by the Korea Health Promotion Foundation (KHPF) from 2005 to 2011. Methods: All of the research reports funded by the KHPF for the period were included in this study. From the literature reviewed, a framework of this study was developed. Results: Quantitative research was 67.7%. The most common quantitative research design was cross-sectional survey (46.6%). Only 7.3% of quantitative research employed theoretical frameworks, and more than a half (53.4%) used primary data. For qualitative research (2.8%), most cases were conducted together with quantitative research. No qualitative research employed a philosophical underpinning. Only 7.0% of research received consent form, and 2.1% was approved by institutional review board. The results of this study indicate that there is a need to employ various research methods to study key concepts of HPR more in-depth. Efforts should be made to reduce statistical errors and also employ newly introduced statistical methods. Conclusions: Overall, a lack of scientific evidence from the HPR reports analyzed in this study was observed. Therefore, the KHPF and the academia should work together to solve the problems indicated from this study.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Breslow, L., "From disease prevention to health promotion", Journal of American Medical Association, 281, pp.1030~1033 (1999)
  2. 조한익, "민간부문의 건강증진 사업과 연구 현황, 발전방향과 과제 - 한국건강관리협회의 건강증진 사업과 연구를 중심으로 -", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(4), pp.40~56 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
  3. Choi, Y. J., "Analysis on the effect of the policy for health promotion of major OECD countries", 2007 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion (2007)
  4. Chung, A. S., "Current situation and challenge in health promotion research", 10th Anniversary Workshop for Health Promotion Research organized by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (2008)
  5. Contento, I., "Review of nutrition education research in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 1998 to 2007", Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40(6), pp.331~340 (2008)
  6. Crosby, R. A., "Research methods in health promotion" (2006), Jossey-Bass
  7. Des Jarlais, D. C., "Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement", American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), pp.361~366 (2004)
  8. Dopson, S., "Knowledge to action?: Evidence-based health care in context" (2005), Oxford University Press
  9. Glasgow, R. E., "The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?", Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(1), pp.3~12 (2004)
  10. Glasgow, R. E., "Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition", Journal Information, 93(8), pp.1261~1267 (2003)
  11. Green, J., "The role of theory in evidence-based health promotion practice", Health Education Research, 15, pp.125~129 (2000)
  12. Higgins, J. P., "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 5)" (2008), Wiley-Blackwell
  13. 전은미, "여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 차이검정을 이용한 논문의 통계활용 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 17(4), pp.388~394 (2011), 여성건강간호학회
  14. Jüni, P., "Systematic reviews in health care : Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials", BMJ : British Medical Journal, 323(7303), pp.42~ (2001)
  15. 김혜경, "최근 보건교육건강증진학회지 게재논문 동향 (2009-2011년)", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(4), pp.1~13 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
  16. 김증임, "여성건강간호학회지의 최근 3년간의 논문분석 (2007-2009년)", 여성건강간호학회지, 16(3), pp.307~316 (2010), 여성건강간호학회
  17. 김광기, "건강증진 연구의 방향과 과제: 한국건강증진재단 연구과제(2005-2011년)를 중심으로", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(4), pp.15~28 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
  18. Koelen, M. A., "Health promotion research : Dilemmas and challenges", Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, pp.257~262 (2001)
  19. 게재 논문의 통계적 기법 활용에대한 평가, "Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases", 2004, 168~179, pp.대한결핵및호흡기학회
  20. A collected volume of health promotion research in last 10 years: year of 2005-2007, "Korea Health Promotion Foundation", Korea Health Promotion Foundation, ~ (2009)
  21. "Research database" (2012)[URL]
  22. "Management Center for Health Promotion" (2013)[URL]
  23. 이규식, "국민건강증진사업 10년의 성과", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 23(1), pp.141~169 (2006), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
  24. 이주열, "(종설) 보건소 건강증진사업의 과거와 미래", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 24(2), pp.135~148 (2007), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
  25. Lindenmayer, D. B., "Adaptive monitoring : A new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring", Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), pp.482~486 (2009)
  26. Merzel, C., "Reconsidering community-based health promotion : Promise, performance, and potential", American Journal of Public Health, 93(4), pp.557~574 (2003)
  27. The National Health Plan 2020, "Ministry of Health and Welfare", Ministry of Health and Welfare, ~ (2011)
  28. Moher, D., "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement", PLoS Medicine, 6(7), pp.e1000097~ (2009)
  29. Munro, B. H., "Statistical methods for health care research (Vol. 1)" (2005), Wolters Kluwer Health
  30. Nerenz, D. R., "Quality improvement and the need for IRB review", Quality Management in Healthcare, 12(3), pp.159~170 (2003)
  31. 박희철, "대한방사선종양학회지 게재 논문의 통계적 오류 현황", Radiation oncology journal, 26(4), pp.289~294 (2008), 대한방사선종양학회
  32. A Study on the Evaluation System and Guideline Development for Health Promotion. Research Funded by the Korean Health Promotion, "Park, S. H.", Hanzhong University, ~, pp.Report No.: 2010-32 (2010)
  33. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research" (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  34. "Qualitative research in health care" (2008)[URL]
  35. Rimer, B. K., "Searching for evidence about health education and health behavior intervention", Health Education & Behavior, 28(2), pp.231~248 (2001)
  36. Rycroft-Malone, J., "Theory and knowledge translation: Setting some coordinates", Nursing Research, 56(4), pp.78~85 (2007)
  37. Sackett, D. L., "On the need for evidence-based medicine", Journal of Public Health, 17(3), pp.330~334 (1995)
  38. Schulz, K. F., "CONSORT 2010 statement : Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials", BMJ, 340, pp.698~702 (2010)
  39. 신현숙, "최근 2년간 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 게재논문 분석-연구 동향, 실험중재, 연구의 근거등급을 중심으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 40(1), pp.139~149 (2010), 한국간호과학회
  40. Smith, B. J., "Quantitative methods used in Australian health promotion research : A review of publications from 1992-2002", Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 17(1), pp.32~36 (2006)
  41. 송태민, "Psychological and Social Factors Affecting Internet Searches on Suicide in Korea: A Big Data Analysis of Google Search Trends", Yonsei Medical Journal, 55(1), pp.254~263 (2014), 연세대학교의과대학
  42. Stroup, D. F., "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology : A proposal for reporting : Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology(MOOSE)group", JAMA, 283(15), pp.2008~2012 (2000)
  43. 서연옥, "최근 3년간 대한간호학회지 게재 논문의 동향", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(6), pp.1013~1019 (2007), 한국간호과학회
  44. Tong, A., "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) : A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups", International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), pp.349~357 (2007)
  45. Vandenbroucke, J. P., "Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration", PLoS Medicine, 4(10), pp.e297~ (2007)
  46. von Elm, E., "The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies", PLoS Medicine, 4, pp.e296~ (2007)
  47. Wallin, L., "Knowledge translation and implementation research in nursing", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, pp.576~587 (2009)
  48. Walshe, K., "Evidence‐based management : From theory to practice in health care", Milbank Quarterly, 79(3), pp.429~457 (2001)
  49. 양성희, "한국임상약학회지에 게재된 논문의 통계 분석기법에 대한 고찰", 보건정보통계학회지, 37(1), pp.1~11 (2012), 한국보건정보통계학회
  50. 유승현, "건강증진 연구 보고지침", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(4), pp.83~99 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)