임상실습 경험이 응급구조학과 학생들의 백밸브 장비 지식과 수행 능력에 미치는 영향
Impact of clinical practice experience on paramedic students’ knowledge and performance of bag-valve device ventilation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This comparative experimental study aimed to analyze the impact of clinical practice experience on paramedic students’ knowledge of bag-valve mask (BVM) devices and their ventilation performance. Methods: A total of 52 third- and fourth-year students enrolled in the emergency medical service department of a university in Chungcheongnam-do participated in the study. Theoretical knowledge was evaluated using a structured pretest. Operational competence was assessed with an advanced airway simulator (BT-CSIE, Korea) to measure average tidal volume, inspiratory time, and interbreath interval. Results: Students who completed the clinical practice course demonstrated significantly better inspiratory time (p = .005) and interbreath interval (p < .001) during endotracheal tube ventilation. Furthermore, those with actual experience ventilating real patients achieved more accurate tidal volume delivery when using a face mask (p = .002). However, the correlation between BVM knowledge and procedural skills was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Clinical training and direct patient exposure appear to enhance BVM proficiency among paramedic students. These findings suggest that integrated education—including not only repeated procedural training but also real-world performance opportunities in clinical settings—is effective.
Abstract
Purpose: This comparative experimental study aimed to analyze the impact of clinical practice experience on paramedic students’ knowledge of bag-valve mask (BVM) devices and their ventilation performance. Methods: A total of 52 third- and fourth-year students enrolled in the emergency medical service department of a university in Chungcheongnam-do participated in the study. Theoretical knowledge was evaluated using a structured pretest. Operational competence was assessed with an advanced airway simulator (BT-CSIE, Korea) to measure average tidal volume, inspiratory time, and interbreath interval. Results: Students who completed the clinical practice course demonstrated significantly better inspiratory time (p = .005) and interbreath interval (p < .001) during endotracheal tube ventilation. Furthermore, those with actual experience ventilating real patients achieved more accurate tidal volume delivery when using a face mask (p = .002). However, the correlation between BVM knowledge and procedural skills was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Clinical training and direct patient exposure appear to enhance BVM proficiency among paramedic students. These findings suggest that integrated education—including not only repeated procedural training but also real-world performance opportunities in clinical settings—is effective.