Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. Methods: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome wasthe number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and meanfragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied. Results: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and meanspecimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). Conclusions: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choosea larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease ofneedle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.
Abstract
Background/Aims: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. Methods: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome wasthe number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and meanfragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied. Results: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and meanspecimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). Conclusions: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choosea larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease ofneedle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.
참고문헌 (14)
- Kalambokis G, "Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review", J Hepatol, 47, pp.284~294 (2007)
- Rockey DC, "Liver biopsy", Hepatology, 49, pp.1017~1044 (2009)
- Pineda JJ, "EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.360~365 (2016)
- Gleeson FC, "Adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound core needle biopsy specimen of nonmalignant hepatic parenchymal disease", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6, pp.1437~1440 (2008)
- Gor N, "Histological adequacy of EUS-guided liver biopsy when using a 19-gauge non-Tru-cut FNA needle", Gastrointest Endosc, 79, pp.170~172 (2014)
- Dewitt J, "Initial experience with EUS-guided tru-cut biopsy of benign liver disease", Gastrointest Endosc, 69(3 Pt 1), pp.535~542 (2009)
- Sey MS, "EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.347~352 (2016)
- Bravo AA, "Liver biopsy", N Engl J Med, 344, pp.495~500 (2001)
- Stavropoulos SN, "High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.310~318 (2012)
- Diehl DL, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy : a multicenter experience", Endosc Int Open, 3, pp.E210~E215 (2015)
- Schulman AR, "Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling : comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.419~426 (2017)
- Lee WJ, "Comparison of the diagnostic yield of EUS needles for liver biopsy : ex vivo study", Diagn Ther Endosc, 2017, pp.1497831~ (2017)
- Bang JY, "Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.1432~1438 (2018)
- Kemper AR, "Biomechanical response of human liver in tensile loading", Ann Adv Automot Med, 54, pp.15~26 (2010)