Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suctiontechnique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. Methods: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suctiontechnique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and thenumber of portal tracts visualized. Results: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7,p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 Gneedle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). Conclusions: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle fortissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suctiontechnique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. Methods: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suctiontechnique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and thenumber of portal tracts visualized. Results: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7,p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 Gneedle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). Conclusions: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle fortissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB.
참고문헌 (16)
- Schulman AR, "Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling : comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.419~426 (2017)
- Pineda JJ, "EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.360~365 (2016)
- Diehl DL, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy : a multicenter experience", Endosc Int Open, 3, pp.E210~E215 (2015)
- Parekh PJ, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy", Endosc Ultrasound, 4, pp.85~91 (2015)
- Mohan BP, "Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 89, pp.238~246 (2019)
- Bazerbachi F, "EUS-guided core liver biopsy sampling using a 22-gauge fork-tip needle : a prospective blinded trial for histologic and lipidomic evaluation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease", Gastrointest Endosc, 90, pp.926~932 (2019)
- Hasan MK, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a 22-G fine-needle biopsy needle : a prospective study", Endoscopy, 51, pp.818~824 (2019)
- Ching-Companioni RA, "19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy : a prospective randomized trial", Endoscopy, 51, pp.1059~1065 (2019)
- Nieto J, "EUS-guided fine-needle core liver biopsy sampling using a novel 19-gauge needle with modified 1-pass, 1actuation wet suction technique", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.469~475 (2018)
- Rockey DC, "Liver biopsy", Hepatology, 49, pp.1017~1044 (2009)
- Caldwell S, "Liver biopsy : the reports of its demise are greatly exaggerated", Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 7, pp.e171~ (2016)
- Bravo AA, "Liver biopsy", N Engl J Med, 344, pp.495~500 (2001)
- Stavropoulos SN, "High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.310~318 (2012)
- Shuja A, "Comparison of EUS-guided versus percutaneous and transjugular approaches for the performance of liver biopsies", Dig Liver Dis, 51, pp.826~830 (2019)
- Mok SR, "19 versus 22 gauge fine-needle biopsy for endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy(EUS-LB) : a prospective randomized trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 85(5 Suppl), pp.AB473~AB474 (2017)
- Bhat I, "EUS-guided liver biopsy using 22G FNB vs. 19G FNB needles: a prospective comparison of core specimen size and diagnostic adequacy", Gastrointest Endosc, 89(6 Suppl), pp.AB293~ (2019)