본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Nationwide Assessment of the “July Effect” and Predictors of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Sepsis at Urban Teaching Hospitals in the United States

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: To analyze the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sepsis in the early (Julyto September) and later (October to June) academic months to assess the “July effect”. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2010–2014) was used to identify ERCP-related adult hospitalizations at urban teachinghospitals by applying relevant procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification. Post-ERCP outcomes were compared between the early and later academic months. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluatethe odds of post-ERCP sepsis and its predictors. Results: Of 481,193 ERCP procedures carried out at urban teaching hospitals, 124,934 were performed during the early academicmonths. The demographics were comparable for ERCP procedures performed during the early and later academic months. A higherincidence (9.4% vs. 8.8%, p<0.001) and odds (odds ratio [OR], 1.07) of post-ERCP sepsis were observed in ERCP performed during theearly academic months. The in-hospital mortality rate (7% vs. 7.5%, p=0.072), length of stay, and total hospital charges in patients withpost-ERCP sepsis were also equivalent between the 2 time points. Pre-ERCP cholangitis (OR, 3.20) and post-ERCP complications suchas cholangitis (OR, 6.27), perforation (OR, 3.93), and hemorrhage (OR, 1.42) were significant predictors of higher post-ERCP sepsis inprocedures performed during the early academic months. Conclusions: The July effect was present in the incidence of post-ERCP sepsis, and academic programs should take into considerationthe predictors of post-ERCP sepsis to lower health-care burden.

Abstract

Background/Aims: To analyze the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sepsis in the early (Julyto September) and later (October to June) academic months to assess the “July effect”. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2010–2014) was used to identify ERCP-related adult hospitalizations at urban teachinghospitals by applying relevant procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification. Post-ERCP outcomes were compared between the early and later academic months. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluatethe odds of post-ERCP sepsis and its predictors. Results: Of 481,193 ERCP procedures carried out at urban teaching hospitals, 124,934 were performed during the early academicmonths. The demographics were comparable for ERCP procedures performed during the early and later academic months. A higherincidence (9.4% vs. 8.8%, p<0.001) and odds (odds ratio [OR], 1.07) of post-ERCP sepsis were observed in ERCP performed during theearly academic months. The in-hospital mortality rate (7% vs. 7.5%, p=0.072), length of stay, and total hospital charges in patients withpost-ERCP sepsis were also equivalent between the 2 time points. Pre-ERCP cholangitis (OR, 3.20) and post-ERCP complications suchas cholangitis (OR, 6.27), perforation (OR, 3.93), and hemorrhage (OR, 1.42) were significant predictors of higher post-ERCP sepsis inprocedures performed during the early academic months. Conclusions: The July effect was present in the incidence of post-ERCP sepsis, and academic programs should take into considerationthe predictors of post-ERCP sepsis to lower health-care burden.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Schulman AR, "Assessment of the July effect in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis : Nationwide Inpatient Sample", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 9, pp.296~303 (2017)
  2. Desai R, "Does"July effect"exist in colonoscopies performed at teaching hospitals", Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol, 3, pp.28~ (2018)
  3. Szary NM, "Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:how to avoid and manage them", Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y), 9, pp.496~504 (2013)
  4. Freeman ML, "Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.909~918 (1996)
  5. Classen DC, "Serious Pseudomonas infections associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography", Am J Med, 84(3 Pt 2), pp.590~596 (1988)
  6. Andriulli A, "Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications : a systematic survey of prospective studies", Am J Gastroenterol, 102, pp.1781~1788 (2007)
  7. Desai R, "Impact of hospital location and teaching status on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sepsis incidence and outcomes: a 5-year national inpatient outlook", Gastroenterology, 154(6 Suppl 1), pp.S1070~S1071 (2018)
  8. "NIS Overview" (2018)[URL]
  9. Desai R, "Alarming increasing trends in hospitalizations and mortality with Heyde’s syndrome: a nationwide inpatient perspective (2007 to 2014)", Am J Cardiol, 123, pp.1149~1155 (2019)
  10. Desai R, "Modern-day nationwide utilization of intravascular ultrasound and its impact on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary atherectomy in the United States", J Ultrasound Med (2019)[DOI]
  11. Desai R, "Racial and sex disparities in resource utilization and outcomes of multi-vessel percutaneous coronary interventions(a 5-year nationwide evaluation in the United States)", Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 9, pp.18~29 (2019)
  12. Inamdar S, "Weekend vs. weekday admissions for cholangitis requiring an ERCP: comparison of outcomes in a national cohort", Am J Gastroenterol, 111, pp.405~410 (2016)
  13. Allareddy V, "The impact of septicemia occurring during hospitalization for renal transplantation procedures on outcomes in adults in United States", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0179466~ (2017)
  14. "NIS description of data elements" (2008)[URL]
  15. Ferrer R, "Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour : results from a guideline-based performance improvement program", Crit Care Med, 42, pp.1749~1755 (2014)
  16. Voiosu T, "Trainee caseload correlates with ERCP success rates but not with procedure-related complications : results from a prospective study(the QUASIE cohort)", Endosc Int Open, 4, pp.E409~E414 (2016)
  17. Voiosu T, "Trainee involvement increases precut rates and delays access to the common bile duct without an increase in procedure-related adverse events: a brave new world of ERCP training?", Rom J Intern Med, 56, pp.55~61 (2018)
  18. Frost JW, "Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E559~E562 (2017)
  19. Kullman E, "Bacteremia following diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP", Gastrointest Endosc, 38, pp.444~449 (1992)
  20. Sauter G, "Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized controlled study", Endoscopy, 22, pp.164~167 (1990)
  21. Thosani N, "Prospective evaluation of bacteremia rates and infectious complications among patients undergoing single-operator choledochoscopy during ERCP", Endoscopy, 48, pp.424~431 (2016)
  22. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals, "Hall MJ", NCHS, 1~8, pp.NCHS Data Brief 2011 (2011)
  23. Holder AL, "Predictors of early progression to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department patients with nonsevere sepsis", Int J Emerg Med, 9, pp.10~ (2016)
  24. Motte S, "Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting", Gastroenterology, 101, pp.1374~1381 (1991)
  25. Watkins AA, "Deconstructing the"July effect"in operative outcomes : a national study", J Gastrointest Surg, 20, pp.1012~1019 (2016)
  26. Cheng CL, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective multicenter study", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.139~147 (2006)
  27. Barry WA, "Is there a July phenomenon? The effect of July admission on intensive care mortality and length of stay in teaching hospitals", J Gen Intern Med, 18, pp.639~645 (2003)
  28. Rich EC, "The relationship of house staff experience to the cost and quality of inpatient care", JAMA, 263, pp.953~957 (1990)
  29. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.273~281 (2017)
  30. Berthelsen CL, "Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample", Top Health Inf Manage, 21, pp.10~23 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

Is the July Effect Real in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?Tae Yoon Lee, Yousuke Nakai대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제5호Impact of Hospital Volume and the Experience of Endoscopist on Adverse Events Related to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Observational Study허준, Chang Min Cho, Dong Wook Lee, Ho Gak Kim, Hyun Jik Lee, Hyunsoo Kim, Jimin Han, Kook Hyun Kim, Kwang Bum Cho, Min Kyu Jung, Tae Nyeun Kim, Yoon Suk Lee거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2020 · 제14권 제2호Risk Factors of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Bacteremia곽민선, 김용태, 류지곤, 박주경, 윤용범, 장은선거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제2호Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications: risk stratification, prevention, and managementChristopher Jen Lock Khor, Clement Chun Ho Wu, Samuel Jun Ming Lim대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2023 · 제56권 제4호Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Nonagenarian Patients: Is It Really Safe?Anna Abbasi, Daniel Simkin, Daria Yunina, Ira Mayer, Kevin Tin, Mary Rojas, Rabin Rahmani, Yuriy Tsirlin, Zain A Sobani대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2018 · 제51권 제4호Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in cirrhosis compared to non-cirrhosis and effect of Child-Pugh score on post-ERCP complications: a systematic review and meta-analysisEbubekir Daglilar, Mustafa Gandhi, Saad Saleem, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ijaz Tarar대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2023 · 제56권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)