Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). Methods: We retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger than 2 cm who had undergone endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 19 G TCB (n=90) or 22 G FNA (n=62). Relevant clinical, tumor-specific, and EUS procedural information was reviewed retrospectively. Results: A specific diagnosis was made for 76 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 51 non-GIST SETs. The diagnostic yield of TCB was greater than that of FNA (77.8% vs. 38.7%, p<0.001). The percentage of non-diagnostic specimens (suspicious and insufficient) was significantly lower in the TCB group (6.7% and 15.5%, respectively) than in the FNA group (22.6% and 38.7%, respectively; both p< 0.001). TCB accurately diagnosed 90.9% of GISTs and 81.1% of non-GIST SETs, whereas FNA accurately diagnosed 68.8% of GISTs and 14.3% of non-GIST SETs. There were nine technical failures with TCB, and the rate of adverse events did not differ between the groups (TCB vs. FNA, 3.3% vs. 8.1%; p=0.27). Conclusions: Nineteen-gauge TCB is safe and highly valuable for diagnosing gastric SETs larger than 2 cm if technical failure can be avoided.
Abstract
Background/Aims: To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). Methods: We retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger than 2 cm who had undergone endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 19 G TCB (n=90) or 22 G FNA (n=62). Relevant clinical, tumor-specific, and EUS procedural information was reviewed retrospectively. Results: A specific diagnosis was made for 76 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 51 non-GIST SETs. The diagnostic yield of TCB was greater than that of FNA (77.8% vs. 38.7%, p<0.001). The percentage of non-diagnostic specimens (suspicious and insufficient) was significantly lower in the TCB group (6.7% and 15.5%, respectively) than in the FNA group (22.6% and 38.7%, respectively; both p< 0.001). TCB accurately diagnosed 90.9% of GISTs and 81.1% of non-GIST SETs, whereas FNA accurately diagnosed 68.8% of GISTs and 14.3% of non-GIST SETs. There were nine technical failures with TCB, and the rate of adverse events did not differ between the groups (TCB vs. FNA, 3.3% vs. 8.1%; p=0.27). Conclusions: Nineteen-gauge TCB is safe and highly valuable for diagnosing gastric SETs larger than 2 cm if technical failure can be avoided.
참고문헌 (33)
- Ando N, "The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 55, pp.37~43 (2002)
- Wiech T, "Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions", Endoscopy, 37, pp.630~634 (2005)
- Papanikolaou IS, "Endoscopic ul-trasonography for gastric submucosal lesions", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 3, pp.86~94 (2011)
- Erickson RA, "EUS-guided FNA", Gastrointest Endosc, 60, pp.267~279 (2004)
- Mortensen MB, "Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study", Endoscopy, 33, pp.478~483 (2001)
- Chang KJ, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration", Gastrointest Endosc, 40, pp.694~699 (1994)
- Sepe PS, "EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield", Gastrointest Endosc, 70, pp.254~261 (2009)
- Varadarajulu S, "Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration", Endoscopy, 36, pp.397~401 (2004)
- Rader AE, "Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c-kit", Cancer, 93, pp.269~275 (2001)
- Jayapal Ramesh, "How Can We Get the Best Results with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration?", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(2), pp.132~137 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Karadsheh Z, "Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.2176~2185 (2014)
- Wiersema MJ, "Initial experience with EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.275~278 (2002)
- Fernández-Esparrach G, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study", Endoscopy, 42, pp.292~299 (2010)
- Hoda KM, "EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.1218~1223 (2009)
- biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study, "Endoscopy", 2009, 329~334
- Polkowski M, "Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline", Endoscopy, 44, pp.190~206 (2012)
- Fazel A, "Interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease", Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 6, pp.104~110 (2004)
- Dumonceau JM, "Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guidelin", Endoscopy, 43, pp.897~912 (2011)
- Jeong-Seop Moon, "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Submucosal Lesion", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(2), pp.117~123 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Lee JH, "Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors >", = 2 cm in diameter, 2011, pp.74, 1010~1018
- Song HJ, "Diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis by using EUS-guided needle sampling in a geographic region with an intermediate tuberculosis burden", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.1307~1313 (2010)
- Fletcher CD, "Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach", Hum Pathol, 33, pp.459~465 (2002)
- Dumonceau JM, "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population", World J Gastroenterol, 18, pp.2357~2363 (2012)
- Erickson RA, "Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies", Gastrointest Endosc, 51, pp.184~190 (2000)
- Jhala NC, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective", Am J Clin Pathol, 120, pp.351~367 (2003)
- Polkowski M, "Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant submucosal tumors", Endoscopy, 37, pp.635~645 (2005)
- Mekky MA, "Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.913~919 (2010)
- Thomas T, "Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience", Am J Gastroenterol, 104, pp.584~591 (2009)
- Storch I, "Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.505~511 (2006)
- Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.1189~1196 (2011)
- 방지영, "Procore and Flexible 19 Gauge Needle Can Replace Trucut Biopsy Needle?", Clinical Endoscopy, 46(5), pp.503~505 (2013), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Kim GH, "Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling", Scand J Gastroenterol, 49, pp.347~354 (2014)
- Lee YN, "Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study", Endoscopy, 46, pp.1056~1062 (2014)