Effect of Sending Educational video Clips via Smartphone mobile messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aim: We aimed to evaluate the effcacy of sending educational video clips via smartphone mobile messenger (SMM) onenhancing bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Methods: This was a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled study. Patients in the SMM group received two videoclips sent via SMM that explained the diet and regimen for bowel preparation, whereas those in the control group did not receive anyvideo clips. We compared the quality of bowel preparation between the two groups, which was assessed by an endoscopist using theOttawa scale. Results: Between August and November 2014, 140 patients in the SMM group and 141 patients in the control group underwentcolonoscopic examination. The total Ottawa score of the SMM group was significantly lower than that of the control group (5.47±1.74vs. 5.97±1.78, p=0.018). These results were particularly prominent in the younger age group; the total Ottawa score of patents in theSMM group aged <40 years was significantly lower than that of patients in the control group aged <40 years (5.10±1.55 vs. 6.22±2.33,p=0.034). Conclusions: We demonstrated that sending educational video clips via SMM could result in better bowel preparation, especially in theyounger age group.
Abstract
Background/Aim: We aimed to evaluate the effcacy of sending educational video clips via smartphone mobile messenger (SMM) onenhancing bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Methods: This was a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled study. Patients in the SMM group received two videoclips sent via SMM that explained the diet and regimen for bowel preparation, whereas those in the control group did not receive anyvideo clips. We compared the quality of bowel preparation between the two groups, which was assessed by an endoscopist using theOttawa scale. Results: Between August and November 2014, 140 patients in the SMM group and 141 patients in the control group underwentcolonoscopic examination. The total Ottawa score of the SMM group was significantly lower than that of the control group (5.47±1.74vs. 5.97±1.78, p=0.018). These results were particularly prominent in the younger age group; the total Ottawa score of patents in theSMM group aged <40 years was significantly lower than that of patients in the control group aged <40 years (5.10±1.55 vs. 6.22±2.33,p=0.034). Conclusions: We demonstrated that sending educational video clips via SMM could result in better bowel preparation, especially in theyounger age group.
참고문헌 (20)
- Sharma VK, "Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution", Gastrointest Endosc, 46, pp.541~543 (1997)
- Ness RM, "Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 96, pp.1797~1802 (2001)
- Chung YW, "Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol : a prospective study in Korea", J Clin Gastroenterol, 43, pp.448~452 (2009)
- Chan WK, "Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy", BMC Gastroenterol, 11, pp.86~ (2011)
- Byrne MF, "The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1587~1590 (2002)
- Tae JW, "Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.804~811 (2012)
- Shieh TY, "Effect of physician-delivered patient education on the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy", Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2013, pp.570180~ (2013)
- Liu X, "Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate : a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study", Gut, 63, pp.125~130 (2014)
- Hsueh FC, "The effect of different patient education methods on quality of bowel cleanliness in outpatients receiving colonoscopy examination", Appl Nurs Res, 27, pp.e1~e5 (2014)
- Froehlich F, "Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy : the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.378~384 (2005)
- Harewood GC, "Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia", Gastrointest Endosc, 58, pp.76~79 (2003)
- Rex DK, "Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1696~1700 (2002)
- Marmo R, "Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy : a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.313~320 (2010)
- Calderwood AH, "An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.307~314 (2011)
- Ergen WF, "Providing hospitalized patients with an educational booklet increases the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 14, pp.858~864 (2016)
- Lee YJ, "Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation : a randomized controlled study", Endoscopy, 47, pp.1018~1027 (2015)
- 조정현, "The Impact of Patient Education with a Smartphone Application on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopy", Clinical Endoscopy, 50(5), pp.479~485 (2017), 대한소화기내시경학회
- 박정훈, "Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy", Annals of Coloproctolgy, 33(3), pp.93~98 (2017), 대한대장항문학회
- Calderwood AH, "Good is better than excellent : bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.691~699 (2015)
- Adike A, "Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate", Ann Gastroenterol, 31, pp.217~223 (2018)
