Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Colorectal polyps are removed to prevent progression to colorectal cancer. Polyp size is an important factor for risk stratification of malignant transformation. Endoscopic size estimation correlates poorly with pathological reports and several factors have been suggested to influence size estimation. We aimed to gain insight into the factors influencing endoscopic polyp size estimation. Methods: Images of polyps in an artificial model were obtained at 1, 3, and 5 cm from the colonoscope’s tip. Participants were asked to estimate the diameter and volume of each polyp. Results: Fifteen endoscopists from three large-volume centers participated in this study. With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.71) for diameter and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.50–0.62) for volume. Polyp size estimated at 3 cm from the colonoscope’s tip yielded the best results. A lower distance between the tip and the polyp was associated with a larger estimated polyp size. Conclusions: Correct endoscopic estimation of polyp size remains challenging. This finding can affect size estimation skills and future training programs for endoscopists.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Colorectal polyps are removed to prevent progression to colorectal cancer. Polyp size is an important factor for risk stratification of malignant transformation. Endoscopic size estimation correlates poorly with pathological reports and several factors have been suggested to influence size estimation. We aimed to gain insight into the factors influencing endoscopic polyp size estimation. Methods: Images of polyps in an artificial model were obtained at 1, 3, and 5 cm from the colonoscope’s tip. Participants were asked to estimate the diameter and volume of each polyp. Results: Fifteen endoscopists from three large-volume centers participated in this study. With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.71) for diameter and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.50–0.62) for volume. Polyp size estimated at 3 cm from the colonoscope’s tip yielded the best results. A lower distance between the tip and the polyp was associated with a larger estimated polyp size. Conclusions: Correct endoscopic estimation of polyp size remains challenging. This finding can affect size estimation skills and future training programs for endoscopists.
참고문헌 (37)
- Winawer SJ, "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup", N Engl J Med, 329, pp.1977~1981 (1993)
- Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
- de Jonge V, "Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy", Endoscopy, 43, pp.560~572 (2011)
- Lieberman DA, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy : a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Gastroenterology, 143, pp.844~857 (2012)
- van Heijningen EM, "Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study", Gastroenterology, 144, pp.1410~1418 (2013)
- Hassan C, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Guideline", Endoscopy, 45, pp.842~851 (2013)
- Hassan C, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Guideline-update 2020", Endoscopy, 52, pp.687~700 (2020)
- Gupta S, "Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy : a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer", Am J Gastroenterol, 115, pp.415~434 (2020)
- Wieszczy P, "Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after removal of adenomas during screening colonoscopies", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.875~883 (2020)
- Ponugoti PL, "Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps", Dig Liver Dis, 49, pp.34~37 (2017)
- Yoshida N, "High incidence of metachronous advanced adenoma and cancer after endoscopic resection of colon polyps ≥20 mm in size", Dig Endosc, 28, pp.194~202 (2016)
- Rex DK, "Real-time endoscopic pathology assessment of colorectal polyps", Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 15, pp.354~ (2013)
- Kessler WR, "A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminutive polyps", Endoscopy, 43, pp.683~691 (2011)
- Schoen RE, "The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate", Gastrointest Endosc, 46, pp.492~496 (1997)
- Moug SJ, "Endoscopists’ estimation of size should not determine surveillance of colonic polyps", Colorectal Dis, 12, pp.646~650 (2010)
- Rubio CA, "Assessing the size of polyp phantoms in tandem colonoscopies", Anticancer Res, 29, pp.1539~1545 (2009)
- Eichenseer PJ, "Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations", Dis Colon Rectum, 56, pp.315~321 (2013)
- Anderson BW, "Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.201~208 (2016)
- Watanabe T, "Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy : visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate", Int J Colorectal Dis, 30, pp.933~938 (2015)
- Gopalswamy N, "Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?", Gastrointest Endosc, 46, pp.497~502 (1997)
- Margulies C, "How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size?", Gastrointest Endosc, 40, pp.174~177 (1994)
- Kaz AM, "Use of a novel polyp"ruler snare"improves estimation of colon polyp size", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.812~816 (2016)
- Kim JH, "Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?", World J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.3220~3226 (2016)
- Plumb AA, "Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology", Endoscopy, 48, pp.899~908 (2016)
- Sakata S, "Measurement bias of polyp size at colonoscopy", Dis Colon Rectum, 60, pp.987~991 (2017)
- Elwir S, "Variability in, and factors associated with, sizing of polyps by endoscopists at a large community practice", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E742~E745 (2017)
- Koo TK, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", J Chiropr Med, 15, pp.155~163 (2016)
- Morales TG, "The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal", Gastrointest Endosc, 43, pp.25~28 (1996)
- Komeda Y, "Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.395~400 (2013)
- Barancin C, "Prospective blinded comparison of polyp size on computed tomography colonography and endoscopic colonoscopy", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 9, pp.443~445 (2011)
- Summers RM, "Polyp size measurement at CT colonography : what do we know and what do we need to know?", Radiology, 255, pp.707~720 (2010)
- Pickhardt PJ, "The natural history of colorectal polyps : overview of predictive static and dynamic features", Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 47, pp.515~536 (2018)
- Johnson CD, "Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers", N Engl J Med, 359, pp.1207~1217 (2008)
- Leng Q, "Measurement system that improves the accuracy of polyp size determined at colonoscopy", World J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.2178~2182 (2015)
- Hyun YS, "Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size", Dig Liver Dis, 43, pp.391~394 (2011)
- Jin HY, "Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy", World J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.623~628 (2015)
- Ferlitsch M, "Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)clinical guideline", Endoscopy, 49, pp.270~297 (2017)
