Post-polypectomy surveillance: the present and the future
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance program requires the effectiveness of reducing colorectal cancer and safety. In addition,the post-polypectomy surveillance program should consider the burden of limited medical resource capacity, cost-effectiveness, andpatient adherence. In this sense, a risk-stratified surveillance program based on baseline colonoscopy results is ideal. Major internationalguidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance, such as those from the European Union and the United States, have recommendedrisk-stratified surveillance programs. Both guidelines have recently been updated to better differentiate between high- and low-risk individuals. In both updated guidelines, more individuals have been downgraded to lower-risk groups that require less frequent or nosurveillance. Furthermore, increased attention has been paid to the surveillance of patients who undergo serrated polyp removal. Previousguidelines in Japan did not clearly outline the risk stratification in post-polypectomy surveillance. However, the new colonoscopyscreening and surveillance guidelines presented by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society include a risk-stratifiedpost-polectomy surveillance program. Further discussion and analysis of unresolved issues in this field, such as the optimal follow-upafter the first surveillance, the upper age limit for surveillance, and the ideal method for improving adherence to surveillance guidelines,are warranted.
Abstract
An appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance program requires the effectiveness of reducing colorectal cancer and safety. In addition,the post-polypectomy surveillance program should consider the burden of limited medical resource capacity, cost-effectiveness, andpatient adherence. In this sense, a risk-stratified surveillance program based on baseline colonoscopy results is ideal. Major internationalguidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance, such as those from the European Union and the United States, have recommendedrisk-stratified surveillance programs. Both guidelines have recently been updated to better differentiate between high- and low-risk individuals. In both updated guidelines, more individuals have been downgraded to lower-risk groups that require less frequent or nosurveillance. Furthermore, increased attention has been paid to the surveillance of patients who undergo serrated polyp removal. Previousguidelines in Japan did not clearly outline the risk stratification in post-polypectomy surveillance. However, the new colonoscopyscreening and surveillance guidelines presented by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society include a risk-stratifiedpost-polectomy surveillance program. Further discussion and analysis of unresolved issues in this field, such as the optimal follow-upafter the first surveillance, the upper age limit for surveillance, and the ideal method for improving adherence to surveillance guidelines,are warranted.
참고문헌 (30)
- Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
- Atkin W, "Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence : a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study", Lancet Oncol, 18, pp.823~834 (2017)
- Tran AH, "Surveillance colonoscopy in elderly patients : a retrospective cohort study", JAMA Intern Med, 174, pp.1675~1682 (2014)
- Sekiguchi M, "Cost-effectiveness analysis of postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance using Japanese data", Dig Endosc, 31, pp.40~50 (2019)
- Winawer SJ, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy : a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.1872~1885 (2006)
- Lieberman DA, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy : a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Gastroenterology, 143, pp.844~857 (2012)
- Gupta S, "Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy : a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.1131~1153 (2020)
- Hassan C, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline", Endoscopy, 45, pp.842~851 (2013)
- Hassan C, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline. Update 2020", Endoscopy, 52, pp.687~700 (2020)
- Brenner H, "Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German screening colonoscopy program", Gastroenterology, 149, pp.356~366 (2015)
- East JE, "British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum", Gut, 66, pp.1181~1196 (2017)
- Shaukat A, "Variation over time and factors associated with detection rates of sessile serrated lesion across the united states : results form a national sample using the GIQuIC Registry", Am J Gastroenterol, 116, pp.95~99 (2021)
- Click B, "Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence", JAMA, 319, pp.2021~2031 (2018)
- He X, "Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.852~861 (2020)
- Lee JK, "Long-term risk of colorectal cancer and related death after adenoma removal in a large, community-based population", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.884~894 (2020)
- Wieszczy P, "Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after removal of adenomas during screening colonoscopies", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.875~883 (2020)
- Sekiguchi M, "Prevalence of serrated lesions, risk factors, and their association with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic screened individuals", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 35, pp.1938~1944 (2020)
- Foss FA, "Inter-observer variability in the histological assessment of colorectal polyps detected through the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme", Histopathology, 61, pp.47~52 (2012)
- Matsuda T, "Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy : the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup", Gut, 70, pp.1469~1478 (2020)
- Tanaka S, "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps", J Gastroenterol, 50, pp.252~260 (2015)
- Saito Y, "Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines", Dig Endosc, 33, pp.486~519 (2021)
- Hotta K, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance in the real clinical practice : nationwide survey of 792 board certified institutions of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society", Dig Endosc, 32, pp.824~ (2020)
- Sekiguchi M, "Incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals with untreated diminutive colorectal adenomas diagnosed by magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 114, pp.964~973 (2019)
- Djinbachian R, "Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Endoscopy, 51, pp.673~683 (2019)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)
- Kaminski MF, "Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy : a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Quality Improvement Initiative", Endoscopy, 49, pp.378~397 (2017)
- Sekiguchi M, "A scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a screened population of asymptomatic Japanese individuals", J Gastroenterol, 53, pp.1109~1119 (2018)
- Kamba S, "Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence : a multicenter randomized controlled trial", J Gastroenterol, 56, pp.746~757 (2021)
- Bishay K, "Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 92, pp.1030~1040 (2020)
- Saito Y, "Current status of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in Japan : the Japan Endoscopic Database Project", Dig Endosc, 34, pp.144~152 (2022)