Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: People around the world are increasingly choosing to undergo colorectal cancer screening via colonoscopy. As a result, guideline adherence to postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance has drawn increasing attention. The present study was performed to assess recognition and adherence to guidelines among primary care physicians and gastroenterologists and to identify characteristics associated with compliance. Methods: A nationwide sample of primary care physicians employed at cancer screening facilities and registered members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were recruited. Participants were asked to complete a survey of six hypothetical clinical scenarios designed to assess their potential course of action in response to screening or follow-up colonoscopy results. Frequencies and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for guideline adherence were estimated. Results: The proportions of doctors recommending shortened colonoscopy surveillance intervals for low- and high-risk adenomas were greater than 90% among primary physicians and were much lower among gastroenterologists. Guideline adherence was relatively good among groups of doctors who were young, had a specialty in gastroenterology, worked at tertiary hospitals, and cared for an appropriate number of patients. Conclusions: The present study reveals a remaining discrepancy between practitioner recommendations and current guidelines for postpolypectomy surveillance. Several factors were shown to be related to guideline adherence, suggesting a need for appropriate control and continuing education or training programs among particular groups of practitioners.
Abstract
Background/Aims: People around the world are increasingly choosing to undergo colorectal cancer screening via colonoscopy. As a result, guideline adherence to postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance has drawn increasing attention. The present study was performed to assess recognition and adherence to guidelines among primary care physicians and gastroenterologists and to identify characteristics associated with compliance. Methods: A nationwide sample of primary care physicians employed at cancer screening facilities and registered members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were recruited. Participants were asked to complete a survey of six hypothetical clinical scenarios designed to assess their potential course of action in response to screening or follow-up colonoscopy results. Frequencies and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for guideline adherence were estimated. Results: The proportions of doctors recommending shortened colonoscopy surveillance intervals for low- and high-risk adenomas were greater than 90% among primary physicians and were much lower among gastroenterologists. Guideline adherence was relatively good among groups of doctors who were young, had a specialty in gastroenterology, worked at tertiary hospitals, and cared for an appropriate number of patients. Conclusions: The present study reveals a remaining discrepancy between practitioner recommendations and current guidelines for postpolypectomy surveillance. Several factors were shown to be related to guideline adherence, suggesting a need for appropriate control and continuing education or training programs among particular groups of practitioners.
참고문헌 (33)
- Inadomi JM, "Screening for colorectal neoplasia", N Engl J Med, 376, pp.149~156 (2017)[DOI]
- Robert S. Bresalier, "Early Detection of and Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia", Gut and Liver, 3(2), pp.69~80 (2009), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Sonnenberg A, "Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer", Ann Intern Med, 133, pp.573~584 (2000)[DOI]
- Pox C, "Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States", Endoscopy, 39, pp.168~173 (2007)[DOI]
- Zapka J, "Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians", J Gen Intern Med, 27, pp.1150~1158 (2012)[DOI]
- Altobelli E, "Colorectal cancer prevention in Europe: burden of disease and status of screening programs", Prev Med, 62, pp.132~141 (2014)[DOI]
- Lieberman DA, "Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000 to 2011", Gastrointest Endosc, 80, pp.133~143 (2014)[DOI]
- 서민아, "Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2013", Cancer Research and Treatment, 48(1), pp.1~10 (2016), 대한암학회[DOI]
- Rees CJ, "European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy", Endoscopy, 48, pp.884~891 (2016)[DOI]
- Winawer SJ, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.1872~1885 (2006)[DOI]
- Lieberman DA, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Gastroenterology, 143, pp.844~857 (2012)[DOI]
- Arditi C, "Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II): surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer", Endoscopy, 41, pp.209~217 (2009)[DOI]
- Hassan C, "Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline", Endoscopy, 45, pp.842~851 (2013)[DOI]
- 양동훈, "Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(1), pp.44~61 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회[DOI]
- 이보인, "Korean Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Polyp Detection", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(1), pp.25~43 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회[DOI]
- Saini SD, "Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey", J Clin Gastroenterol, 43, pp.554~558 (2009)[DOI]
- Mysliwiec PA, "Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy", Ann Intern Med, 141, pp.264~271 (2004)[DOI]
- Boolchand V, "Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians", Ann Intern Med, 145, pp.654~659 (2006)[DOI]
- 손대경, "A Survey of Colonoscopic Surveillance After Polypectomy", Annals of Coloproctolgy, 30(2), pp.88~92 (2014), 대한대장항문학회
- Anderson JC, "Factors associated with shorter colonoscopy surveillance intervals for patients with lowrisk colorectal adenomas and effects on outcome", Gastroenterology, 152, pp.1933~1943 (2017)[DOI]
- Krist AH, "Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation", Am J Prev Med, 33, pp.471~478 (2007)[DOI]
- Laiyemo AO, "Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, pp.562~567 (2009)[DOI]
- Schoen RE, "Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice", Gastroenterology, 138, pp.73~81 (2010)[DOI]
- Ransohoff DF, "Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.2623~2630 (2011)[DOI]
- Radaelli F, "Overutilization of postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study", Dig Liver Dis, 44, pp.748~753 (2012)[DOI]
- Kruse GR, "Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance", J Gen Intern Med, 30, pp.277~283 (2015)[DOI]
- Menees SB, "Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 79, pp.551~557 (2014)[DOI]
- Murphy CC, "Underuse and overuse of colonoscopy for repeat screening and surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 14, pp.436~444 (2016)[DOI]
- 강문수, "용종절제술 후 대장내시경 추적검사 시기에 관한 설문 조사", Clinical Endoscopy, 33(6), pp.339~345 (2006), 대한소화기내시경학회
- 홍성노, "국내 대장 폴립 절제 후 추적검사 현황", Intestinal research, 9(2), pp.118~128 (2011), 대한장연구학회
- 홍성노, "폴립절제 후 추적대장내시경검사 가이드라인", 대한소화기학회지, 59(2), pp.99~117 (2012), 대한소화기학회
- Jeong SY, "Guideline for colorectal polyp management", 64th Annual Congress of the Korean Surgical Society, pp.256~257 (2012), Korean Surgical Society
- 이승민, "The Risk of Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Rises in Parallel with an Increasing Number of High-Risk Findings at Baseline", Gut and Liver, 9(6), pp.741~749 (2015), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회