본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Automated Prediction of Ischemic Brain Tissue Fate from Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신경과학

초록

Background and Purpose Multiphase computed tomographic angiography (mCTA) provides time variant images of pial vasculature supplying brain in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To develop a machine learning (ML) technique to predict tissue perfusion and infarction from mCTA source images. Methods 284 patients with AIS were included from the Precise and Rapid assessment of collaterals using multi-phase CTA in the triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke for Intra-artery Therapy (Prove-IT) study. All patients had non-contrast computed tomography, mCTA, and computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) at baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging/noncontrast- enhanced computed tomography. Of the 284 patient images, 140 patient images were randomly selected to train and validate three ML models to predict a pre-defined Tmax thresholded perfusion abnormality, core and penumbra on CTP. The remaining 144 patient images were used to test the ML models. The predicted perfusion, core and penumbra lesions from ML models were compared to CTP perfusion lesion and to follow-up infarct using Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Dice similarity coefficient. Results Mean difference between the mCTA predicted perfusion volume and CTP perfusion volume was 4.6 mL (limit of agreement [LoA], –53 to 62.1 mL; P=0.56; CCC 0.63 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.71; P<0.01], ICC 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78; P<0.001]). Mean difference between the mCTA predicted infarct and follow-up infarct in the 100 patients with acute reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [mTICI] 2b/2c/3) was 21.7 mL, while it was 3.4 mL in the 44 patients not achieving reperfusion (mTICI 0/1). Amongst reperfused subjects, CCC was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.55; P<0.01) and ICC was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.50; P<0.01); in non-reperfused subjects CCC was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.60; P<0.001) and ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.76; P<0.001). No difference was observed between the mCTA and CTP predicted infarct volume in the test cohort (P=0.67). Conclusions A ML based mCTA model is able to predict brain tissue perfusion abnormality and follow-up infarction, comparable to CTP.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Multiphase computed tomographic angiography (mCTA) provides time variant images of pial vasculature supplying brain in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To develop a machine learning (ML) technique to predict tissue perfusion and infarction from mCTA source images. Methods 284 patients with AIS were included from the Precise and Rapid assessment of collaterals using multi-phase CTA in the triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke for Intra-artery Therapy (Prove-IT) study. All patients had non-contrast computed tomography, mCTA, and computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) at baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging/noncontrast- enhanced computed tomography. Of the 284 patient images, 140 patient images were randomly selected to train and validate three ML models to predict a pre-defined Tmax thresholded perfusion abnormality, core and penumbra on CTP. The remaining 144 patient images were used to test the ML models. The predicted perfusion, core and penumbra lesions from ML models were compared to CTP perfusion lesion and to follow-up infarct using Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Dice similarity coefficient. Results Mean difference between the mCTA predicted perfusion volume and CTP perfusion volume was 4.6 mL (limit of agreement [LoA], –53 to 62.1 mL; P=0.56; CCC 0.63 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.71; P<0.01], ICC 0.68 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.78; P<0.001]). Mean difference between the mCTA predicted infarct and follow-up infarct in the 100 patients with acute reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [mTICI] 2b/2c/3) was 21.7 mL, while it was 3.4 mL in the 44 patients not achieving reperfusion (mTICI 0/1). Amongst reperfused subjects, CCC was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.55; P<0.01) and ICC was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.50; P<0.01); in non-reperfused subjects CCC was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.60; P<0.001) and ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.76; P<0.001). No difference was observed between the mCTA and CTP predicted infarct volume in the test cohort (P=0.67). Conclusions A ML based mCTA model is able to predict brain tissue perfusion abnormality and follow-up infarction, comparable to CTP.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Albers GW, "Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging", N Engl J Med, 378, pp.708~718 (2018)
  2. Mokin M, "Predictive value of RAPID assessed perfusion thresholds on final infarct volume in SWIFT PRIME(Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment)", Stroke, 48, pp.932~938 (2017)
  3. Nogueira RG, "Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct", N Engl J Med, 378, pp.11~21 (2018)
  4. Campbell BC, "Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.1009~1018 (2015)
  5. Campbell BC, "Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core", Stroke, 42, pp.3435~3440 (2011)
  6. d’Esterre CD, "Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke", Stroke, 46, pp.3390~3397 (2015)
  7. Qiu W, "Response by Qiu et al to letter regarding article, "Confirmatory study of time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for use in acute ischemic stroke"", Stroke, 51, pp.e8~ (2020)
  8. Qiu W, "Confirmatory study of time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for use in acute ischemic stroke", Stroke, 50, pp.3269~3273 (2019)
  9. Goyal M, "Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.1019~1030 (2015)
  10. Menon BK, "Association of clinical, imaging, and thrombus characteristics with recanalization of visible intracranial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke", JAMA, 320, pp.1017~1026 (2018)
  11. Menon BK, "Multiphase CT angiography : a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke", Radiology, 275, pp.510~520 (2015)
  12. Ospel JM, "Displaying multiphase CT angiography using a time-variant color map : practical considerations and potential applications in patients with acute stroke", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 41, pp.200~205 (2020)
  13. d’Esterre CD, "Regional comparison of multiphase computed tomographic angiography and computed tomographic perfusion for prediction of tissue fate in ischemic stroke", Stroke, 48, pp.939~945 (2017)
  14. Yu I, "Admission diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and Alberta stroke program early CT score of ≥6 points : serial computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging collateral measurements", Stroke, 50, pp.3115~3120 (2019)
  15. Lee SJ, "Optimal multiphase computed tomographic angiography-based infarct core estimations for acute ischemic stroke", Sci Rep, 9, pp.15243~ (2019)
  16. Najm M, "Automated brain extraction from head CT and CTA images using convex optimization with shape propagation", Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 176, pp.1~8 (2019)
  17. Boers AMM, "Association of follow-up infarct volume with functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke : a pooled analysis of seven randomized trials", J Neurointerv Surg, 10, pp.1137~1142 (2018)
  18. Modat M, "Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units", Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 98, pp.278~284 (2010)
  19. Bivard A, "Ischemic core thresholds change with time to reperfusion : a case control study", Ann Neurol, 82, pp.995~1003 (2017)
  20. Bivard A, "Perfusion CT in acute stroke : a comprehensive analysis of infarct and penumbra", Radiology, 267, pp.543~550 (2013)
  21. Fahmi F, "3D movement correction of CT brain perfusion image data of patients with acute ischemic stroke", Neuroradiology, 56, pp.445~452 (2014)
  22. Menon BK, "Analysis of workflow and time to treatment on thrombectomy outcome in the endovascular treatment for small core and proximal occlusion ischemic stroke (ESCAPE) randomized, controlled trial", Circulation, 133, pp.2279~2286 (2016)
  23. Hill MD, "Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 395, pp.878~887 (2020)
  24. Stewart EE, "Correlation between hepatic tumor blood flow and glucose utilization in a rabbit liver tumor model", Radiology, 239, pp.740~750 (2006)
  25. Johnson JA, "A model for capillary exchange", Am J Physiol, 210, pp.1299~1303 (1966)
  26. Boutelier T, "Bayesian hemodynamic parameter estimation by bolus tracking perfusion weighted imaging", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 31, pp.1381~1395 (2012)
  27. Meijs M, "Analysis of perfusion MRI in stroke: to deconvolve, or not to deconvolve", Magn Reson Med, 76, pp.1282~1290 (2016)
  28. McKinley R, "A machine learning approach to perfusion imaging with dynamic susceptibility contrast MR", Front Neurol, 9, pp.717~ (2018)
  29. Shen D, "Deep learning in medical image analysis", Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 19, pp.221~248 (2017)
  30. Hoving JW, "Volumetric and spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion estimated ischemic core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke", Stroke, 49, pp.2368~2375 (2018)
  31. Qiu W, "Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non-contrast-enhanced CT", Radiology, 294, pp.638~644 (2020)
  32. Goyal M, "Challenging the ischemic core concept in acute ischemic stroke imaging", Stroke, 51, pp.3147~3155 (2020)
  33. Kemmling A, "Multivariate dynamic prediction of ischemic infarction and tissue salvage as a function of time and degree of recanalization", J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 35, pp.1397~1405 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Impact of Multiphase Computed Tomography Angiography for Endovascular Treatment Decision- Making on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic StrokeAlexander Khaw, Andrew M. Demchuk, Bijoy K. Menon, Enrico Fainardi, Jai J. Shankar, Johanna M. Ospel, Marta Rubiera, Mayank Goyal, Michael D. Hill, Mohamed Najm, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, Moiz Hafeez, Ondrej Volny, Sarah Abdalrahman, Wu Qiu대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2021 · 제23권 제3호Outcome Prediction Using Perfusion Parameters and Collateral Scores of Multi-Phase and Single-Phase CT Angiography in Acute Stroke: Need for One, Two, Three, or Thirty Scans?Antonia Zapf, Carolin Peter, Daniel Behme, Ilko L. Maier, Ioannis Tsogkas, Jan Liman, Katharina Schregel, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Marlena Schnieder, Michael Knauth대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2018 · 제20권 제3호Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Imaging of Ischemic Stroke윤웅, 김슬기, 박일우, 백병현, Ara Cho, Luu-Ngoc Do대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2022 · 제26권 제4호Segmentation of the Hyperdense Artery Sign on Noncontrast CT in Ischemic Stroke Using Artificial IntelligenceBeom Joon Kim, Leonard Sunwoo, Myungjae Lee, Nakhoon Kim, Pyeong Eun Kim, Sue Young Ha, Wi-Sun Ryu대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2025 · 제21권 제4호Perfusion Imaging to Select Patients with Large Ischemic Core for Mechanical ThrombectomyAymeric Rouchaud, Basile Kerleroux, Benjamin Gory, Charline Perot, Cyril Dargazanli, Dimitri Daly-Eraya, Florent Gariel, François Zhu, Gaultier Marnat, Géraud Forestier, Grégoire Boulouis, Jean François Hak, JENI Research Collaborative, Johannes Kaesmacher, Joseph Benzakoun, Kevin Janot, Lili Detraz, Pasquale Mordasini, Romain Bourcier, Wagih Ben-Hassen대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2020 · 제22권 제2호CT Angiography of Collateral Vessels and Outcomes in Endovascular-Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients권오기, 김범준, 김준엽, 박홍균, 배희준, 양미화, 정종원, 정철규, 한문구, 황교준대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2017 · 제13권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)