본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Impact of Multiphase Computed Tomography Angiography for Endovascular Treatment Decision- Making on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신경과학

초록

Background and Purpose Various imaging paradigms are used for endovascular treatment (EVT) decision-making and outcome estimation in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aim to compare how these imaging paradigms perform for EVT patient selection and outcome estimation. Methods Prospective multi-center cohort study of patients with AIS symptoms with multi-phase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) baseline imaging. mCTA-based EVT-eligibility was defined as presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) and moderate-to-good collaterals on mCTA. CTP-based eligibility was defined as presence of LVO, ischemic core (defined on relative cerebral blood flow, absolute cerebral blood flow, and cerebral blood volume maps) <70 mL, mismatch-ratio >1.8, absolute mismatch >15 mL. EVT-eligibility and adjusted rates of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) based on these imaging paradigms were compared. Results Of 289/464 patients with LVO, 263 (91%) were EVT-eligible by mCTA-criteria versus 63 (22%), 19 (7%) and 103 (36%) by rCBF, aCBF, and CBV-CTP-criteria. CTP and mCTA-criteria were discordant in 40% to 53%. Estimated outcomes were best in patients who met both mCTA and CTP eligibility-criteria and were treated with EVT (62% to 87% good outcome). Patients eligible for EVT by mCTA-criteria and not by CTP-criteria receiving EVT achieved good outcome rates of 53% to 57%. Few patients met CTP-criteria and not mCTA-criteria for EVT. Conclusions Simpler imaging selection criteria that rely on little else than detection of the occluded blood vessel may be more sensitive and less specific, thus resulting in more patients being offered EVT and arguably benefiting from it.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Various imaging paradigms are used for endovascular treatment (EVT) decision-making and outcome estimation in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aim to compare how these imaging paradigms perform for EVT patient selection and outcome estimation. Methods Prospective multi-center cohort study of patients with AIS symptoms with multi-phase computed tomography angiography (mCTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) baseline imaging. mCTA-based EVT-eligibility was defined as presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) and moderate-to-good collaterals on mCTA. CTP-based eligibility was defined as presence of LVO, ischemic core (defined on relative cerebral blood flow, absolute cerebral blood flow, and cerebral blood volume maps) <70 mL, mismatch-ratio >1.8, absolute mismatch >15 mL. EVT-eligibility and adjusted rates of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) based on these imaging paradigms were compared. Results Of 289/464 patients with LVO, 263 (91%) were EVT-eligible by mCTA-criteria versus 63 (22%), 19 (7%) and 103 (36%) by rCBF, aCBF, and CBV-CTP-criteria. CTP and mCTA-criteria were discordant in 40% to 53%. Estimated outcomes were best in patients who met both mCTA and CTP eligibility-criteria and were treated with EVT (62% to 87% good outcome). Patients eligible for EVT by mCTA-criteria and not by CTP-criteria receiving EVT achieved good outcome rates of 53% to 57%. Few patients met CTP-criteria and not mCTA-criteria for EVT. Conclusions Simpler imaging selection criteria that rely on little else than detection of the occluded blood vessel may be more sensitive and less specific, thus resulting in more patients being offered EVT and arguably benefiting from it.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Berkhemer OA, "A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.11~20 (2015)
  2. Goyal M, "Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.1019~1030 (2015)
  3. Campbell BC, "Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.1009~1018 (2015)
  4. Saver JL, "Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke", N Engl J Med, 372, pp.2285~2295 (2015)
  5. Nogueira RG, "Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct", N Engl J Med, 378, pp.11~21 (2018)
  6. Albers GW, "Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging", N Engl J Med, 378, pp.708~718 (2018)
  7. Wang Z, "Collateral status at single-phase and multiphase CT angiography versus CT perfusion for outcome prediction in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke", Radiology, 296, pp.393~400 (2020)
  8. Menon BK, "Multiphase CT angiography : a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke", Radiology, 275, pp.510~520 (2015)
  9. Wintermark M, "Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra : receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke", Stroke, 37, pp.979~985 (2006)
  10. Bandera E, "Cerebral blood flow threshold of ischemic penumbra and infarct core in acute ischemic stroke : a systematic review", Stroke, 37, pp.1334~1339 (2006)
  11. d’Esterre CD, "Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke", Stroke, 46, pp.3390~3397 (2015)
  12. Hill MD, "Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 395, pp.878~887 (2020)
  13. Powers WJ, "Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke : 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association, 2019, pp.50, e344~e418
  14. Turc G, "European Stroke Organisation(ESO) : European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy(ESMINT)guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke", J Neurointerv Surg, 11, pp.535~538 (2019)
  15. Olivot JM, "Mismatch profile influences outcome after mechanical thrombectomy", Stroke, 52, pp.232~240 (2021)
  16. Sarraj A, "Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs medical management alone in patients with large ischemic cores : a secondary analysis of the optimizing patient’s selection for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke(SELECT)study", JAMA Neurol, 76, pp.1147~1156 (2019)
  17. Jadhav AP, "Select wisely : the ethical challenge of defining large core with perfusion in the early time window", J Neurointerv Surg, 13, pp.497~499 (2021)
  18. Kim B, "Comparison between perfusion-and collateral-based triage for endovascular thrombectomy in a late time window", Stroke, 50, pp.3465~3470 (2019)
  19. Goyal M, "Endovascular thrombectomy after largevessel ischaemic stroke : a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials", Lancet, 387, pp.1723~1731 (2016)
  20. Lopez-Rivera V, "Impact of initial imaging protocol on likelihood of endovascular stroke therapy", Stroke, 51, pp.3055~3063 (2020)
  21. Menon BK, "Efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions : metaanalysis of data from the HERMES Collaboration", J Neurointerv Surg, 11, pp.1065~1069 (2019)
  22. Román LS, "Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment : a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data", Lancet Neurol, 17, pp.895~904 (2018)
  23. Rodger M, "Diagnostic randomized controlled trials : the final frontier", Trials, 13, pp.137~ (2012)
  24. Grunwald IQ, "Collateral automation for triage in stroke : evaluating automated scoring of collaterals in acute stroke on computed tomography scans", Cerebrovasc Dis, 47, pp.217~222 (2019)
  25. Almekhlafi MA, "Imaging triage of patients with latewindow(6-24 hours)acute ischemic stroke : a comparative study using multiphase CT angiography versus CT perfusion", Am J Neuroradiol, 41, pp.129~133 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Outcome Prediction Using Perfusion Parameters and Collateral Scores of Multi-Phase and Single-Phase CT Angiography in Acute Stroke: Need for One, Two, Three, or Thirty Scans?Antonia Zapf, Carolin Peter, Daniel Behme, Ilko L. Maier, Ioannis Tsogkas, Jan Liman, Katharina Schregel, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Marlena Schnieder, Michael Knauth대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2018 · 제20권 제3호CT Angiography of Collateral Vessels and Outcomes in Endovascular-Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients권오기, 김범준, 김준엽, 박홍균, 배희준, 양미화, 정종원, 정철규, 한문구, 황교준대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2017 · 제13권 제2호Automated Prediction of Ischemic Brain Tissue Fate from Multiphase Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine LearningAndrew M. Demchuk, Bijoy K. Menon, Hulin Kuang, Johanna M. Ospel, Mayank Goyal, Michael D. Hill, Wu Qiu대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2021 · 제23권 제2호Choosing a Hyperacute Stroke Imaging Protocol for Proper Patient Selection and Time Efficient Endovascular Treatment: Lessons from Recent TrialsAndrew M. Demchuk, Jin Soo Lee대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2015 · 제17권 제3호Perfusion Imaging to Select Patients with Large Ischemic Core for Mechanical ThrombectomyAymeric Rouchaud, Basile Kerleroux, Benjamin Gory, Charline Perot, Cyril Dargazanli, Dimitri Daly-Eraya, Florent Gariel, François Zhu, Gaultier Marnat, Géraud Forestier, Grégoire Boulouis, Jean François Hak, JENI Research Collaborative, Johannes Kaesmacher, Joseph Benzakoun, Kevin Janot, Lili Detraz, Pasquale Mordasini, Romain Bourcier, Wagih Ben-Hassen대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2020 · 제22권 제2호Selection of Candidates for Endovascular Treatment: Characteristics According to Three Different Selection Methods방오영, Beom Joon Kim, Cheolkyu Jung, Gyeong-Moon Kim, Han-Gil Jeong, Hee-Joon Bae, Jong-Won Chung, Moon-Ku Han, Woo-Keun Seo대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2019 · 제21권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)