관상동맥 컴퓨터 단층 촬영술과 운동부하 심전도 검사의 실제임상에서의 검사 정확도 비교
Comparison of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Exercise ECG Test for Diagnostic Accuracy in Real-World Practice
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The exercise ECG test (XECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) have been usedwidely in initial evaluations of coronary artery disease (CAD) in real-world practice. In this study, we compared the diagnosticpower of CTCA and XECG, based on conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Methods: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients retrospectively who had been examined with both XECG and CTCA for theevaluation of CAD in outpatient clinics. Significant stenosis was defined as more than 50% diameter stenosis. Triage to CCA and/orrevascularization treatment (RT) by the results of XECG and CTCA and the diagnostic accuracy of both exams, based on CCA,were investigated. Results: In the 589 patients, 107 (19%) were triaged to CCA for further evaluation; in 77 (12.8%) significant stenosis was detectedon CCA. Also, 65 (11%) patients underwent RT. In the CTCA results, 120 patients had significant stenosis. Of them, 58 (48%) and75 (62%) patients were triaged to RT and CCA, respectively. Based on the XECG, 115 positive patients were triaged to RT andCCA (23 [20%]/41 [35%]). Among 107 patients with CCA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negativ epredictive value for significant stenosis on CCA of CTCA were 89.9%, 74.0%, 90.6%, and 71.4%, respectively, and those of XECG were 50.0, 67.9, 78.0, and 37.3, respectively. The kappa value of CCA and CTCA was 0.62 (p < 0.001) and that of CCA andXECG was 0.145 (p = 0.113). Conclusions: In real-world practice, CCA was decided on more frequently, based on CTCA. CTCA showed better diagnosticaccuracy than XECG.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The exercise ECG test (XECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) have been usedwidely in initial evaluations of coronary artery disease (CAD) in real-world practice. In this study, we compared the diagnosticpower of CTCA and XECG, based on conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Methods: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients retrospectively who had been examined with both XECG and CTCA for theevaluation of CAD in outpatient clinics. Significant stenosis was defined as more than 50% diameter stenosis. Triage to CCA and/orrevascularization treatment (RT) by the results of XECG and CTCA and the diagnostic accuracy of both exams, based on CCA,were investigated. Results: In the 589 patients, 107 (19%) were triaged to CCA for further evaluation; in 77 (12.8%) significant stenosis was detectedon CCA. Also, 65 (11%) patients underwent RT. In the CTCA results, 120 patients had significant stenosis. Of them, 58 (48%) and75 (62%) patients were triaged to RT and CCA, respectively. Based on the XECG, 115 positive patients were triaged to RT andCCA (23 [20%]/41 [35%]). Among 107 patients with CCA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negativ epredictive value for significant stenosis on CCA of CTCA were 89.9%, 74.0%, 90.6%, and 71.4%, respectively, and those of XECG were 50.0, 67.9, 78.0, and 37.3, respectively. The kappa value of CCA and CTCA was 0.62 (p < 0.001) and that of CCA andXECG was 0.145 (p = 0.113). Conclusions: In real-world practice, CCA was decided on more frequently, based on CTCA. CTCA showed better diagnosticaccuracy than XECG.
참고문헌 (27)
- Chaitman BR, "The changing role of the exercise electrocardiogram as a diagnostic and prognostic test for chronic ischemic heart disease", J Am Coll Cardiol, 8, pp.1195~1210 (1986)
- Marwick TH, "Current status of non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia", Acta Clin Belg, 47, pp.1~5 (1992)
- Fletcher GF, "Update on exercise stress testing", Am Fam Physician, 74, pp.1749~1754 (2006)
- Elhendy A, "Safety of dobutamine-atropine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy", J Nucl Med, 39, pp.1662~1666 (1998)
- Kisacik HL, "Comparison of exercise stress testing with simultaneous dobutamine stress echocardiography and technetium-99m isonitrile singlephoton emission computerized tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease", Eur Heart J, 17, pp.113~119 (1996)
- Fletcher GF, "Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", Circulation, 104, pp.1694~1740 (2001)
- Anagnostopoulos C, "Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging", Heart, 90(1), pp.i1~10 (2004)
- Geleijnse ML, "Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography", J Am Coll Cardiol, 30, pp.595~606 (1997)
- Herzog C, "Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography", Radiology, 244, pp.112~120 (2007)
- Miller JM, "Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT", N Engl J Med, 359, pp.2324~2336 (2008)
- Muhlenbruch G, "Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients", Eur Radiol, 17, pp.603~609 (2007)
- Nikolaou K, "Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 187, pp.111~117 (2006)
- Vanhoenacker PK, "Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis", Radiology, 244, pp.419~428 (2007)
- Pundziute G, "Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: noninvasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis", Eur Heart J, 29, pp.2373~2381 (2008)
- Kitagawa T, "Comprehensive evaluation of noncalcified coronary plaque characteristics detected using 64-slice computed tomography in patients with proven or suspected coronary artery disease", Am Heart J, 154, pp.1191~1198 (2007)
- Rubinshtein R, "Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin", Circulation, 115, pp.1762~1768 (2007)
- Hoffmann U, "Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial", J Am Coll Cardiol, 53, pp.1642~1650 (2009)
- White CS, "Chest pain in the emergency department: role of multidetector CT", Radiology, 245, pp.672~681 (2007)
- Greenland P, "ACCF", AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF, Circulation, pp.2007, 115[DOI]
- Austen WG, "A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association", Circulation, 51(4), pp.5~40 (1975)
- Sekhri N, "How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients", Heart, 93, pp.458~463 (2007)
- Gianrossi R, "Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis", Circulation, 80, pp.87~98 (1989)
- Meijboom WB, "64- slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease", J Am Coll Cardiol, 50, pp.1469~1475 (2007)
- Miller JM, "Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64", Eur Radiol, 19, pp.816~828 (2009)
- Cademartiri F, "Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a zero calcium score", Eur Radiol, 20, pp.81~87 (2010)
- Gill CJ, "Why clinicians are natural bayesians", BMJ, 330, pp.1080~1083 (2005)
- Earls JP, "Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose", Radiology, 246, pp.742~753 (2008)