Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Colonoscopy for screening is associated with unpleasant experiences for patients, and abdominal compression devices have been developed to minimize these problems. However, there is a paucity of data supporting the therapeutic benefits of this strategy. This study examined the effects of using an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on the cecal intubation time (CIT), abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural changes. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus (from inception to November 2021) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on CIT, abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural change. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Our pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled trials revealed that abdominal compression devices significantly reduced CIT (WMD, –0.76 [–1.49 to –0.03] minutes; p=0.04), abdominal compression (OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.94; p=0.03), and postural changes (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.78; p=0.004) during colonoscopy. However, our results did not show a significant change in patient comfort (WMD, –0.48; 95% CI, –1.05 to 0.08; p=0.09) when using an abdominal compression device. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that employing an abdominal compression device may reduce CIT, abdominal compression, and postural change but have no impact on patient comfort.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Colonoscopy for screening is associated with unpleasant experiences for patients, and abdominal compression devices have been developed to minimize these problems. However, there is a paucity of data supporting the therapeutic benefits of this strategy. This study examined the effects of using an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on the cecal intubation time (CIT), abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural changes. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus (from inception to November 2021) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on CIT, abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural change. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Our pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled trials revealed that abdominal compression devices significantly reduced CIT (WMD, –0.76 [–1.49 to –0.03] minutes; p=0.04), abdominal compression (OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.94; p=0.03), and postural changes (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.78; p=0.004) during colonoscopy. However, our results did not show a significant change in patient comfort (WMD, –0.48; 95% CI, –1.05 to 0.08; p=0.09) when using an abdominal compression device. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that employing an abdominal compression device may reduce CIT, abdominal compression, and postural change but have no impact on patient comfort.
참고문헌 (19)
- Corley DA, "Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death", N Engl J Med, 370, pp.1298~1306 (2014)
- Nishizawa T, "Trainee participation during colonoscopy adversely affects polyp and adenoma detection rates", Digestion, 84, pp.245~246 (2011)
- Ignjatovic A, "Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy(Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial) : a prospective cohort study", Lancet Oncol, 10, pp.1171~1178 (2009)
- Ansa BE, "Evaluation of colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States(2000-2014)", J Clin Med, 7, pp.22~ (2018)
- Crockett SD, "Use of an abdominal compression device in colonoscopy : a randomized, sham-controlled trial", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 14, pp.850~857 (2016)
- Nishizawa T, "Effects of encircled abdominal compression device in colonoscopy : a meta-analysis", J Clin Med, 9, pp.11~ (2019)
- Özkan ZK, "The impact of wearing an abdominal corset to achieve compression on colonoscopy outcomes : a randomised controlled trial", Gastrointest Nurs, 19(Sup2), pp.S18~ (2021)
- Prechel JA, "The importance of abdominal pressure during colonoscopy : techniques to assist the physician and to minimize injury to the patient and assistant", Gastroenterol Nurs, 28, pp.232~236 (2005)
- Rothman JP, "Abdominal binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery : a systematic review", Dan Med J, 61, pp.A4941~ (2014)
- Goksoy B, "The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy : a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial", Scand J Gastroenterol, 56, pp.990~997 (2021)
- Toros AB, "Does a fitted abdominal corset makes colonoscopy more tolerable?", Dig Endosc, 24, pp.164~167 (2012)
- Toyoshima O, "Colonoscopy using back brace support belt : a randomized, prospective trial", JGH Open, 4, pp.441~445 (2019)
- Tsutsumi S, "Colonoscopy using an abdominal bandage", Hepatogastroenterology, 54, pp.1983~1984 (2007)
- Yu GQ, "Use of an abdominal obstetric binder in colonoscopy : a randomized, prospective trial", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 33, pp.1365~1369 (2018)
- Liberati A, "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : explanation and elaboration", J Clin Epidemiol, 62, pp.e1~ (2009)
- Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
- von Renteln D, "Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.574~580 (2017)
- Franco DL, "Approach to incomplete colonoscopy: new techniques and technologies", Gastroenterol Hepatol(N Y), 13, pp.476~483 (2017)
- Runge T, "The effect of provider experience on efficacy of ColoWrap use during colonoscopy : results from a randomized-controlled trial : 1579", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.S681~ (2015)