본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study

6

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than thatof colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented,especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however,no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the presentstudy retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by threetrainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecalintubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups. Results: The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubationtime. No major complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.

Abstract

Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than thatof colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented,especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however,no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the presentstudy retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by threetrainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecalintubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups. Results: The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubationtime. No major complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Bray F, "Global cancer statistics 2018 : GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries", CA Cancer J Clin, 68, pp.394~424 (2018)
  2. Brenner H, "Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy : a population-based, case-control study", Ann Intern Med, 154, pp.22~30 (2011)
  3. Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
  4. Samadder NJ, "Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study", Gastroenterology, 146, pp.950~960 (2014)
  5. Corley DA, "Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death", N Engl J Med, 370, pp.1298~1306 (2014)
  6. Robertson DJ, "Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy : a pooled multicohort analysis", Gut, 63, pp.949~956 (2014)
  7. Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)
  8. Lee TJ, "Colonoscopy quality measures : experience from the NHS bowel cancer screening programme", Gut, 61, pp.1050~1057 (2012)
  9. Koch AD, "Competence measurement during colonoscopy training : the use of self-assessment of performance measures", Am J Gastroenterol, 107, pp.971~975 (2012)
  10. Munroe CA, "A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training : a venture into uncharted territory", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.561~567 (2012)
  11. Ng SC, "The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Am J Gastroenterol, 107, pp.1165~1173 (2012)
  12. Rastogi A, "Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy : a randomised controlled trial", Gut, 61, pp.402~408 (2012)
  13. de Wijkerslooth TR, "Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy : a randomised controlled trial", Gut, 61, pp.1426~1434 (2012)
  14. Kim DJ, "Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level", World J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.6261~6270 (2015)
  15. Williet N, "Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate : meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Endoscopy, 50, pp.846~860 (2018)
  16. González-Fernández C, "Higher adenoma detection rate with the endocuff : a randomized trial", Endoscopy, 49, pp.1061~1068 (2017)
  17. De Palma GD, "Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection : a randomized back-to-back study", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.232~240 (2018)
  18. Chin M, "Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection : a meta-analysis", World J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.9642~9649 (2016)
  19. Sola-Vera J, "Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection : results of a randomized study", Endoscopy, 51, pp.742~749 (2019)
  20. Aronchick CA, "Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing", Am J Gastroenterol, 94, pp.2667~ (1999)
  21. Massl R, "Comparing quality, safety, and costs of colonoscopies performed by nurse vs physician trainees", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 12, pp.470~477 (2014)
  22. "The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions:esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002", Gastrointest Endosc, 58(6 Suppl), pp.S3~S43 (2003)
  23. Baxter NN, "Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty", J Clin Oncol, 30, pp.2664~2669 (2012)
  24. Shaukat A, "Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, pp.1335~1340 (2009)
  25. Klare P, "Trainee colonoscopists fulfil quality standards for the detection of adenomatous polyps", BMC Med Educ, 15, pp.26~ (2015)
  26. Park SM, "The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training : prospective randomized study of six trainees", Surg Endosc, 26, pp.2939~2943 (2012)
  27. Gianotti RJ, "A longitudinal study of adenoma detection rate in gastroenterology fellowship training", Dig Dis Sci, 61, pp.2831~2837 (2016)
  28. Floer M, "Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy-a randomized controlled multicenter trial", PLoS One, 9, pp.e114267~ (2014)
  29. Biecker E, "Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate : a randomized controlled trial", J Clin Gastroenterol, 49, pp.413~418 (2015)
  30. van Doorn SC, "Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy : a multicentre randomised controlled trial", Gut, 66, pp.438~445 (2017)
  31. Pioche M, "Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate : a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.288~295 (2016)
  32. Henrikson NB, "Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer : systematic review", Genet Med, 17, pp.702~712 (2015)
  33. Anderson JC, "Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 54, pp.558~562 (2001)
  34. Nam JH, "Factors for cecal intubation time during colonoscopy in women : impact of surgical history", Saudi J Gastroenterol, 25, pp.377~383 (2019)
  35. Coe SG, "Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men", Gastrointest Endosc, 77, pp.631~635 (2013)
  36. Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.31~53 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Accessories to Enhance Adenoma Detection Rates: Is the Endocuff Better than the Conventional Cap for Trainees?강상범, 권태근대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2020 · 제53권 제3호Endoscopy Nurse Participation May Increase the Polyp Detection Rate by Second-Year Fellows during Screening Colonoscopies김병익, 김홍주, 박동일, 박정호, 손정일, 전우규, 조용균, Do Young Lee, Jae Wan Lim, Jang Hyuk Yoon, Tae Sun Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2012 · 제6권 제3호GI Genius increases small and right-sided adenoma and sessile serrated lesion detection rate when used with EndoCuff in a real-world setting: a retrospective United States studyColton Pence, David Wan, Enad Dawod, Felice Schnoll-Sussman, Jade Wang, Jeong Hoon Kim, Patrick Magahis, Reem Z. Sharaiha대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2025 · 제58권 제3호Learning Curves for Colonoscopy: A Prospective Evaluation of Gastroenterology Fellows at a Single Center김나영, 김진욱, 박영수, 이광호, 이동호, 이동훈, 이상협, 정숙향, 정재일, 황진혁, Eun Sil Lee, Hyun Chul Choi, Ji Yeon Won, Jong Chun Na, Jung Hun Lee, Kyung Phil Kang, Min Sik Um, Tek Man Nam, Yeon Mu Chung거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2010 · 제4권 제1호Colonoscopy Quality and Strategies for ImprovementLadabaum Uri, Lee Hyun Jung거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2026 · 제20권 제1호The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies은창수, 한동수, Jong Pyo Kim, Joong Ho Bae, Sang Bong Ahn, Tae Jun Byun거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2012 · 제6권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)