본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Baron TH, "American Gastroenterolog ical Association clinical practice update : management of pancreatic necrosis", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.67~75 (2020)
  2. van Santvoort HC, "A step-up ap proach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1491~1502 (2010)
  3. van Brunschot S, "Endoscop ic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis : a multicentre randomised trial", Lancet, 391, pp.51~58 (2018)
  4. Hollemans RA, "Superiority of step-up approach vs open necrosectomy in long-term fol low-up of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis", Gastroenterology, 156, pp.1016~1026 (2019)
  5. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.481~488 (2016)
  6. Keane MG, "Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections : a 14year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.3730~3740 (2016)
  7. Khan MA, "Endoscopic versus percutaneous management for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Endosc Int Open, 6, pp.E474~E483 (2018)
  8. Hookey LC, "Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients : a comparison of eti ologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.635~643 (2006)
  9. Chandrasekhara V, "Predicting the need for step-up therapy after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 19, pp.2192~2198 (2021)
  10. Park DH, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts : a prospective randomized trial", Endoscopy, 41, pp.842~848 (2009)
  11. Siddiqui AA, "EUS-guided drainage of peri pancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-ap posing stent : a large retrospective, multicenter U. S. experience(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.699~707 (2016)
  12. "AXIOS Stent with Delivery System 510(k) K153088. 20998/S007 approval letter" (2015)[URL]
  13. Shah RJ, "Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lu men-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents", Clin Gastroen terol Hepatol, 13, pp.747~752 (2015)
  14. Rinninella E, "EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen-apposing metal stent on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system : a large retro spective study(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.1039~1046 (2015)
  15. Bang JY, "Lumen-apposing metal stents(LAMS)for pancreatic fluid collection(PFC)drainage : may not be business as usual", Gut, 66, pp.2054~2056 (2017)
  16. Chandrasekhara V, "Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents versus plastic stents to treat walled-off pancreatic necrosis : systematic review and meta-analysis", Endosc Int Open, 8, pp.E1639~E1653 (2020)
  17. "Assess ing cardiovascular risk: systematic evidence review from the Risk Assessment Work Group" (2013)[URL]
  18. Higgins JP, "The Cochrane Collab oration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials", BMJ, 343, pp.d5928~ (2011)
  19. AbiMansour JP, "Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections", Gastrointest Endosc, 99, pp.104~107 (2024)
  20. Puga M, "Safety of lumen-apposing stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultra sound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections : a retrospec tive study", Endoscopy, 50, pp.1022~1026 (2018)
  21. Aburajab M, "Safety and efficacy of lumen-ap posing metal stents with and without simultaneous double-pigtail plastic stents for draining pancreatic pseudocyst", Gastrointest En dosc, 87, pp.1248~1255 (2018)
  22. Ali SE, "Anchoring lumen-appos ing metal stent with coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultra sound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections : any benefit?", Ann Gastroenterol, 32, pp.620~625 (2019)
  23. Haddad JD, "Safety and efficacy of lu men-apposing metal stents with and without coaxial plastic stents for pancreatic fluid collections", Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc, 25, pp.113~118 (2023)
  24. Shamah SP, "Double pigtail stent placement as an adjunct to lumen-apposing metal stentsfor drainage of pancreatic fluid collections may not affect outcomes : a multicenter experience", Endosc Ultrasound, 11, pp.53~58 (2022)
  25. Vanek P, "EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis : a pro spective bicentric randomized controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 97, pp.1070~1080 (2023)
  26. Aujla P, "Stent within a stent : when lumen apposing metal stent meets its match in coaxial double pigtail stent", Gastrointest Endosc, 97, pp.AB920~ (2023)
  27. Perez Estrada C, "Efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of abdom inal fluid collections and the influence of inserting a coaxial dou ble pigtail plastic stent", United Eur Gastroenterol J, 10(Suppl 8), pp.984~985 (2022)
  28. Gluck M, "Dual modality drainage for symp tomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitaliza tion, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage", J Gastrointest Surg, 16, pp.248257~ (2012)
  29. Varadarajulu S, "Multiple translu minal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis", Gastrointest Endosc, 74, pp.74~80 (2011)
  30. Bakker OJ, "Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pan creatitis : a randomized trial", JAMA, 307, pp.1053~1061 (2012)
  31. Varadarajulu S, "Equal efficacy of endoscop ic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial", Gastroenterology, 145, pp.583~590 (2013)
  32. Penn DE, "Prospective evaluation of the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.679~684 (2012)
  33. Bang JY, "Importance of discon nected pancreatic duct syndrome in recurrence of pancreatic fluid collections initially drained using lumen-apposing metal stents", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 19, pp.1275~1281 (2021)
  34. van Dijk SM, "Treatment of dis rupted and disconnected pancreatic duct in necrotizing pancreatitis : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Pancreatology, 19, pp.905915~ (2019)
  35. Wang L, "Impact of disconnected pancre atic duct syndrome on endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections", Endoscopy, 53, pp.603~610 (2021)
  36. Giri S, "Does a coaxial double pigtail stent reduce adverse events after lumen apposing met al stent placement for pancreatic fluid collections? A systematic review and meta-analysis", Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc, 16, pp.26317745231199364~ (2023)
  37. Lang GD, "EUS-guided drainage of peripancre atic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents : comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.150~157 (2018)
  38. Dayyeh BK, "Combined drainage and protocolized necrosectomy through a coaxial lumen-apposing metal stent for pancreatic walled-off necrosis : a prospective multi center trial", Ann Surg, 277, pp.e1072~e1080 (2023)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Plastic Stent and Novel Lumen-apposing Metal Stent for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections정민규, 조창민, Ho Cheol Shin, Seong Jae Yeo대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제4호Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: Where Are We Now?Hiroshi Kawakami, Naoya Sakamoto, Takao Itoi거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2014 · 제8권 제4호Metal versus Plastic Stent for Transmural Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections방지영, Shyam Varadarajulu대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제5호Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collectionsAbe Kyohei, Ego Aki, Fukushima Hideki, Hamura Ryoga, Hisa Takeshi, Ishizaki Shunta, Ito Yui, Kudo Akiharu, Nishiyama Shigeru, Onda Shinji, Osera Shozo, Sakata Shogo, Shirai Yoshihiro, Tsunematsu Masashi, Yamada Takahiro소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2025 · 제14권 제1호Effcacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Stents for Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in a Community Hospital SettingAbdelkader Chaar, Babu P. Mohan, Mohammed Barawi, Rajat Garg, Susan Szpunar대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2020 · 제53권 제4호Pancreatic Fluid Collection Drainage by Endoscopic Ultrasound: An updateMichel Kahaleh, Monica Gaidhane, Shashideep Singhal, Stephen R. Rotman대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)