본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score (GS) upgrading [higher GS category in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen than in the prostate biopsy] in Korean men. Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 247 men who underwent RP between May 2006 and April 2011 at our institution. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume was categorized as 25 cm3 or less (n=61), 25 to 40 cm3 (n=121) and greater than 40 cm3 (n=65). GS was examined as a categorical variable of 6 or less, 3+4 and 4+3 or greater. The relationship between TRUS volume and upgrading of GS was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Overall, 87 patients (35.2%) were upgraded, 20 (8.1%) were downgraded, and 140 (56.7%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Smaller TRUS volume was significantly associated with increased likelihood of upgrading (p trend=0.022). Men with prostates 25 cm3 or less had more than 2.7 times the risk of disease being upgraded relative to men with TRUS volumes more than 40 cm3 (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.403-8.126). Conclusion: In our study, smaller prostate volumes were at increased risk for GS upgrading after RP. This finding should be kept in mind when making treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer that appears to be of a low grade on biopsy, especially in Asian urologic fields.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score (GS) upgrading [higher GS category in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen than in the prostate biopsy] in Korean men. Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 247 men who underwent RP between May 2006 and April 2011 at our institution. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume was categorized as 25 cm3 or less (n=61), 25 to 40 cm3 (n=121) and greater than 40 cm3 (n=65). GS was examined as a categorical variable of 6 or less, 3+4 and 4+3 or greater. The relationship between TRUS volume and upgrading of GS was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Overall, 87 patients (35.2%) were upgraded, 20 (8.1%) were downgraded, and 140 (56.7%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Smaller TRUS volume was significantly associated with increased likelihood of upgrading (p trend=0.022). Men with prostates 25 cm3 or less had more than 2.7 times the risk of disease being upgraded relative to men with TRUS volumes more than 40 cm3 (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.403-8.126). Conclusion: In our study, smaller prostate volumes were at increased risk for GS upgrading after RP. This finding should be kept in mind when making treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer that appears to be of a low grade on biopsy, especially in Asian urologic fields.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Corcoran NM, "Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence", BJU Int, 108(8), pp.E202~E210 (2011)
  2. Albertsen PC, "20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer", JAMA, 293, pp.2095~2101 (2005)
  3. Epstein JI, "Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer", JAMA, 271, pp.368~374 (1994)
  4. Kulkarni GS, "Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy", Cancer, 109, pp.2432~2438 (2007)
  5. Gofrit ON, "Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer", J Urol, 178, pp.1925~1928 (2007)
  6. Dong F, "Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading", J Urol, 179, pp.896~900 (2008)
  7. Turley RS, "Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database", J Urol, 179, pp.523~527 (2008)
  8. Hsieh TF, "Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer", J Chin Med Assoc, 68, pp.167~171 (2005)
  9. Nepple KG, "Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens", Int Braz J Urol, 35, pp.559~564 (2009)
  10. Hong SK, "Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (> or = 12)-core prostate biopsy", World J Urol, 27, pp.271~276 (2009)
  11. Miyake H, "Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores", Urol Int, 79, pp.302~306 (2007)
  12. Freedland SJ, "SEARCH Database Study Group. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications", Urology, 69, pp.495~499 (2007)
  13. Kassouf W, "Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies", J Urol, 178, pp.111~114 (2007)
  14. 문성진, "Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy", Korean Journal of Urology, 51(10), pp.677~682 (2010), 대한비뇨기과학회
  15. 임택, "저위험군 전립선암에서 근치적 전립선절제술 후 Gleason 점수의 상승의 예측 인자", Korean Journal of Urology, 50(12), pp.1182~1187 (2009), 대한비뇨기과학회
  16. Mochtar CA, "Prostate-specific antigen as an estimator of prostate volume in the management of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia", Eur Urol, 44, pp.695~700 (2003)
  17. Chung BH, "Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre study", BJU Int, 97, pp.742~746 (2006)
  18. Müntener M, "Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 53, pp.767~775 (2008)
  19. Moussa AS, "Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer", BJU Int, 103, pp.43~48 (2009)
  20. Pinthus JH, "Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome", J Urol, 176, pp.979~984 (2006)
  21. Humphrey PA, "Stratification of pathologic features in radical prostatectomy specimens that are predictive of elevated initial postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen levels", Cancer, 71, pp.1821~1827 (1993)
  22. Zincke H, "Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 1,143 patients from a single institution", J Clin Oncol, 12, pp.2254~2263 (1994)
  23. Carter HB, "Diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer, In Campbell-Walsh urology", pp.2912~2931 (2007), Saunders WB
  24. Davies JD, "Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer", J Urol, 186, pp.2221~2227 (2011)
  25. Mir MC, "Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score?", BJU Int, 102, pp.563~565 (2008)
  26. Kojima M, "Influence of noncancerous prostatic tissue volume on prostate-specific antigen", Urology, 51, pp.293~299 (1998)
  27. Freedland SJ, "Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.7546~7554 (2005)
  28. Magheli A, "Prostate specific antigen density to predict prostate cancer upgrading in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series: a single center experience", J Urol, 183, pp.126~131 (2010)
  29. Sfoungaristos S, "Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer", Can Urol Assoc J, pp.1~5 (2012)
  30. Song C, "Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy", Urology, 68, pp.820~824 (2006)
  31. Lee SE, "Application of the Epstein criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer in Korean men", BJU Int, 105, pp.1526~1530 (2010)
  32. 염찬동, "Are Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancers Really Insignificant among Korean Men?", Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(2), pp.358~362 (2012), 연세대학교의과대학
  33. 이혜원, "임상적으로 무의미한 전립선암의 예측인자와 그 진단적 유용성", Korean Journal of Urology, 49(5), pp.398~403 (2008), 대한비뇨기과학회

관련 논문AI추천

Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Korea: A Multicenter Analysis of Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy곽철, 권동득, 권태균, 김형진, 변석수, 서성일, 안한종, 이현무, 전성수, 정재승, 정창욱, 하홍구, 홍성규대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호Recent Changes in the Clinicopathologic Features of Korean Men with Prostate Cancer: A Comparison with Western Populations변석수, 서성일, 송채린, 안한종, 이상은, 이상철, 이은식, 이현무, 조진선, 최영득, 최한용연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2012 · 제53권 제3호Re-stratification of Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer According to the NCCN Guidelines among Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis Based on the K-CaP Registry구교철, 김청수, 나군호, 변석수, 이광석, 이지열, 이현무, 정병하, 최인영, 홍성규, 홍준혁대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호A Predictive Model Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Parameters for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Korean Population천준, 강석호, 강성구, 강하은, 노태일, 성득제, 심지성, 이정구, 진현정, 태종현, 현창완대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제4호한국 전립샘암 데이터베이스를 활용한 근치적 전립샘절제술 후 생화학적 재발 예측김청수, 박용현, 변석수, 서성일, 유성혜, 이선정, 정창욱, 최문주, 최인영, 홍준혁한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2019 · 제44권 제1호Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Provides More Precise Data on Benign Prostate Volume Than Total Prostate-Specific Antigen in Korean Population최훈, 김재헌, 박재영, 배재현, 심지성대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2013 · 제17권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)