Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to analyze the relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score (GS) upgrading [higher GS category in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen than in the prostate biopsy] in Korean men. Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 247 men who underwent RP between May 2006 and April 2011 at our institution. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume was categorized as 25 cm3 or less (n=61), 25 to 40 cm3 (n=121) and greater than 40 cm3 (n=65). GS was examined as a categorical variable of 6 or less, 3+4 and 4+3 or greater. The relationship between TRUS volume and upgrading of GS was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Overall, 87 patients (35.2%) were upgraded, 20 (8.1%) were downgraded, and 140 (56.7%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Smaller TRUS volume was significantly associated with increased likelihood of upgrading (p trend=0.022). Men with prostates 25 cm3 or less had more than 2.7 times the risk of disease being upgraded relative to men with TRUS volumes more than 40 cm3 (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.403-8.126). Conclusion: In our study, smaller prostate volumes were at increased risk for GS upgrading after RP. This finding should be kept in mind when making treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer that appears to be of a low grade on biopsy, especially in Asian urologic fields.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to analyze the relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score (GS) upgrading [higher GS category in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen than in the prostate biopsy] in Korean men. Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 247 men who underwent RP between May 2006 and April 2011 at our institution. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume was categorized as 25 cm3 or less (n=61), 25 to 40 cm3 (n=121) and greater than 40 cm3 (n=65). GS was examined as a categorical variable of 6 or less, 3+4 and 4+3 or greater. The relationship between TRUS volume and upgrading of GS was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Overall, 87 patients (35.2%) were upgraded, 20 (8.1%) were downgraded, and 140 (56.7%) had identical biopsy and pathological Gleason sum groups. Smaller TRUS volume was significantly associated with increased likelihood of upgrading (p trend=0.022). Men with prostates 25 cm3 or less had more than 2.7 times the risk of disease being upgraded relative to men with TRUS volumes more than 40 cm3 (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.403-8.126). Conclusion: In our study, smaller prostate volumes were at increased risk for GS upgrading after RP. This finding should be kept in mind when making treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer that appears to be of a low grade on biopsy, especially in Asian urologic fields.
참고문헌 (33)
- Corcoran NM, "Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence", BJU Int, 108(8), pp.E202~E210 (2011)
- Albertsen PC, "20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer", JAMA, 293, pp.2095~2101 (2005)
- Epstein JI, "Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer", JAMA, 271, pp.368~374 (1994)
- Kulkarni GS, "Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy", Cancer, 109, pp.2432~2438 (2007)
- Gofrit ON, "Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer", J Urol, 178, pp.1925~1928 (2007)
- Dong F, "Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading", J Urol, 179, pp.896~900 (2008)
- Turley RS, "Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database", J Urol, 179, pp.523~527 (2008)
- Hsieh TF, "Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer", J Chin Med Assoc, 68, pp.167~171 (2005)
- Nepple KG, "Gleason score and laterality concordance between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens", Int Braz J Urol, 35, pp.559~564 (2009)
- Hong SK, "Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (> or = 12)-core prostate biopsy", World J Urol, 27, pp.271~276 (2009)
- Miyake H, "Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores", Urol Int, 79, pp.302~306 (2007)
- Freedland SJ, "SEARCH Database Study Group. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications", Urology, 69, pp.495~499 (2007)
- Kassouf W, "Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies", J Urol, 178, pp.111~114 (2007)
- 문성진, "Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy", Korean Journal of Urology, 51(10), pp.677~682 (2010), 대한비뇨기과학회
- 임택, "저위험군 전립선암에서 근치적 전립선절제술 후 Gleason 점수의 상승의 예측 인자", Korean Journal of Urology, 50(12), pp.1182~1187 (2009), 대한비뇨기과학회
- Mochtar CA, "Prostate-specific antigen as an estimator of prostate volume in the management of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia", Eur Urol, 44, pp.695~700 (2003)
- Chung BH, "Relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre study", BJU Int, 97, pp.742~746 (2006)
- Müntener M, "Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 53, pp.767~775 (2008)
- Moussa AS, "Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer", BJU Int, 103, pp.43~48 (2009)
- Pinthus JH, "Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome", J Urol, 176, pp.979~984 (2006)
- Humphrey PA, "Stratification of pathologic features in radical prostatectomy specimens that are predictive of elevated initial postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen levels", Cancer, 71, pp.1821~1827 (1993)
- Zincke H, "Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 1,143 patients from a single institution", J Clin Oncol, 12, pp.2254~2263 (1994)
- Carter HB, "Diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer, In Campbell-Walsh urology", pp.2912~2931 (2007), Saunders WB
- Davies JD, "Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer", J Urol, 186, pp.2221~2227 (2011)
- Mir MC, "Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score?", BJU Int, 102, pp.563~565 (2008)
- Kojima M, "Influence of noncancerous prostatic tissue volume on prostate-specific antigen", Urology, 51, pp.293~299 (1998)
- Freedland SJ, "Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.7546~7554 (2005)
- Magheli A, "Prostate specific antigen density to predict prostate cancer upgrading in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series: a single center experience", J Urol, 183, pp.126~131 (2010)
- Sfoungaristos S, "Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer", Can Urol Assoc J, pp.1~5 (2012)
- Song C, "Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy", Urology, 68, pp.820~824 (2006)
- Lee SE, "Application of the Epstein criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer in Korean men", BJU Int, 105, pp.1526~1530 (2010)
- 염찬동, "Are Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancers Really Insignificant among Korean Men?", Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(2), pp.358~362 (2012), 연세대학교의과대학
- 이혜원, "임상적으로 무의미한 전립선암의 예측인자와 그 진단적 유용성", Korean Journal of Urology, 49(5), pp.398~403 (2008), 대한비뇨기과학회
