Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Healthcare Workers Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Healthcare-associated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have recently become an important issue for healthcare facilities due to high rates of infection, mortality, and high treatment costs. We investigated the frequency of MRSA in healthcare workers (HCWs) via nasal carriage and assessed the performance of the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test. We tested nasal swabs from the anterior nares of participating HCWs at an intensive care unit. Nasal swabs were identified as S. aureus, methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCoNS or MRCoNS), or MRSA by using conventional culture and the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test. Of the 142 HCWs who participated in this study, only 11 participants (7.8%) were MRSA-positive by conventional culture and MRSA ID, and 24 (16.9%) were positive for mecA by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In terms of diagnostic performance,the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90.1%, a positive predictive value of 45.8%, and a negative predictive value of 100% compared with conventional culture method. The detection limit of the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test was 103 colony/mL. We concluded that real-time PCR was able to rapidly and sensitively detect MRSA in HCWs. However, MRSA must be confirmed by culture due to false positivity.
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have recently become an important issue for healthcare facilities due to high rates of infection, mortality, and high treatment costs. We investigated the frequency of MRSA in healthcare workers (HCWs) via nasal carriage and assessed the performance of the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test. We tested nasal swabs from the anterior nares of participating HCWs at an intensive care unit. Nasal swabs were identified as S. aureus, methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCoNS or MRCoNS), or MRSA by using conventional culture and the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test. Of the 142 HCWs who participated in this study, only 11 participants (7.8%) were MRSA-positive by conventional culture and MRSA ID, and 24 (16.9%) were positive for mecA by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In terms of diagnostic performance,the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90.1%, a positive predictive value of 45.8%, and a negative predictive value of 100% compared with conventional culture method. The detection limit of the LightCycler® MRSA Advanced test was 103 colony/mL. We concluded that real-time PCR was able to rapidly and sensitively detect MRSA in HCWs. However, MRSA must be confirmed by culture due to false positivity.
참고문헌 (13)
- Peterson LR, "Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test as a rapid method for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance swabs", J Clin Microbiol, 48, pp.1661~1666 (2010)
- Francois P, "Evaluation of three molecular assays for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus", J Clin Microbiol, 45, pp.2011~2013 (2007)
- Peterson LR, "5 Million Lives Campaign. Case study: an MRSA intervention at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare", Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 33, pp.732~738 (2007)
- Safdar N, "The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus", Am J Med, 121, pp.310~315 (2008)
- Albrich WC, "Health-care workers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA?", Lancet Infect Dis, 8, pp.289~301 (2008)
- Berger-Bächi B, "Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci", Arch Microbiol, 178, pp.165~171 (2002)
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, "Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-first informational supplement", Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100-S21, ~ (2011)
- Yang HY, "Evaluation of commercial selective agars in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus", Ann Clin Lab Sci, 40, pp.252~256 (2010)
- Bischof LJ, "Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs", J Clin Microbiol, 47, pp.2281~2283 (2009)
- Kelley PG, "Comparison of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay, BD GeneOhm MRSA assay, and culture for detection of nasal and cutaneous groin colonization by MRSA", J Clin Microbiol, 47, pp.3769~3772 (2009)
- Paule SM, "Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use", J Clin Microbiol, 45, pp.2993~2998 (2007)
- van Hal SJ, "MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs", Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 28, pp.47~53 (2009)
- Wolk DM, "Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares", J Clin Microbiol, 47, pp.758~764 (2009)