본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Blastocyst Transfer Ameliorates Live Birth Rate Compared with Cleavage-Stage Embryos Transfer in Fresh In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: Reviews and Meta-Analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: Blastocyst transfer has been recommended to raise the implantation rate without affecting the pregnancy rate. The objective of this meta-analysis is to systematicallyevaluate whether the live birth rate and other pregnancy outcomes can be improved by blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer. Materials and Methods: EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for papers published between March 2004 and March 2013. An extensive range of the electronic databases yielded initially 317 studies from which seven trials met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Our outcome measures were the live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, multiplepregnancy rate, first trimester miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Fixed effects models were chosen to calculate the odds ratio (OR). Results: Seven trials (n=1446 cases) were finally analyzed. Compared with cleavage-stage embryostransfer, the blastocyst transfer was statistically significantly associated with an increase in clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.78], implantation rate (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.74) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.57-2.94), and also a reduction in the probability of first trimestermiscarriage rate (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.87). The improvement in the live birth rate was also observed (OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.32-2.37). Moreover, there was no evidence of difference in multiple pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy rates. Conclusion: The available evidences suggest that live birth and other pregnancy outcomes after fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) are significantly improved following blastocyst transfer as compared to cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

Abstract

Purpose: Blastocyst transfer has been recommended to raise the implantation rate without affecting the pregnancy rate. The objective of this meta-analysis is to systematicallyevaluate whether the live birth rate and other pregnancy outcomes can be improved by blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer. Materials and Methods: EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for papers published between March 2004 and March 2013. An extensive range of the electronic databases yielded initially 317 studies from which seven trials met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Our outcome measures were the live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, multiplepregnancy rate, first trimester miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate. Fixed effects models were chosen to calculate the odds ratio (OR). Results: Seven trials (n=1446 cases) were finally analyzed. Compared with cleavage-stage embryostransfer, the blastocyst transfer was statistically significantly associated with an increase in clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.78], implantation rate (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.74) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.57-2.94), and also a reduction in the probability of first trimestermiscarriage rate (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.87). The improvement in the live birth rate was also observed (OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.32-2.37). Moreover, there was no evidence of difference in multiple pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy rates. Conclusion: The available evidences suggest that live birth and other pregnancy outcomes after fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) are significantly improved following blastocyst transfer as compared to cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Mangalraj AM, "Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer", J Hum Reprod Sci, 2, pp.23~26 (2009)
  2. Karaki RZ, "Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome", Fertil Steril, 77, pp.114~118 (2002)
  3. Edwards RG, "Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits", Hum Reprod, 14, pp.1~6 (1999)
  4. Gardner DK, "Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?", Hum Reprod Update, 3, pp.367~382 (1997)
  5. Pool TB, "Oocyte and embryo culture: basic concepts and recent advances", Infert Reprod Med Clinics N Amer, 9, pp.181~203 (1998)
  6. Tsirigotis M, "Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice?", Hum Reprod, 13, pp.3285~3289 (1998)
  7. Gardner DK, "No longer neglected: the human blastocyst", Hum Reprod, 13, pp.3289~3292 (1998)
  8. Gardner DK, "Choosing between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers", Clin Obstet Gynecol, 49, pp.85~92 (2006)
  9. Blake DA, "Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD002118~ (2007)
  10. Papanikolaou EG, "Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis", Hum Reprod, 23, pp.91~99 (2008)
  11. Glujovsky D, "Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, pp.CD002118~ (2012)
  12. Hreinsson J, "Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 117, pp.194~200 (2004)
  13. Kolibianakis EM, "Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer?", Hum Reprod, 19, pp.2550~2554 (2004)
  14. Papanikolaou EG, "Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study", Hum Reprod, 20, pp.3198~3203 (2005)
  15. Papanikolaou EG, "In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos", N Engl J Med, 354, pp.1139~1146 (2006)
  16. Fisch JD, "Single embryo transfer (SET) day 3 vs. day 5 based on graduated embryo score (GES) and soluble human leukocyte antigen-g (sHLA-G): preliminary results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial", Fertil Steril, 88(Suppl 1), pp.S332~S333 (2007)
  17. Brugnon F, "Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: A randomized and prospective study", Hum Reprod, 25(Suppl 1), pp.i60~i61 (2010)[DOI]
  18. Elgindy EA, "Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial", Reprod Biomed Online, 23, pp.789~798 (2011)
  19. Källén B, "Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome?", Fertil Steril, 94, pp.1680~1683 (2010)
  20. Pantos K, "The successful use of hatched blastocysts in assisted reproductive technology", Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 28, pp.113~117 (2001)
  21. Palmer GA, "Pregnancies following blastocyst stage transfer in PGD cycles at risk for beta-thalassaemic haemoglobinopathies", Hum Reprod, 17, pp.25~31 (2002)
  22. Frattarelli JL, "Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial", Fertil Steril, 79, pp.228~230 (2003)
  23. Paulson RJ, "Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity", Fertil Steril, 96, pp.530~535 (2011)
  24. Bourgain C, "The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF", Hum Reprod Update, 9, pp.515~522 (2003)
  25. Fleming R, "The source and implications of progesterone rise during the follicular phase of assisted reproduction cycles", Reprod Biomed Online, 21, pp.446~449 (2010)
  26. Papanikolaou EG, "Progesterone rise on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration impairs pregnancy outcome in day 3 single-embryo transfer, while has no effect on day 5 single blastocyst transfer", Fertil Steril, 91, pp.949~952 (2009)
  27. Papanikolaou EG, "Early pregnancy loss is significantly higher after day 3 single embryo transfer than after day 5 single blastocyst transfer in GnRH antagonist stimulated IVF cycles", Reprod Biomed Online, 12, pp.60~65 (2006)
  28. IvicaTadin, "Fetal Reduction in Multifetal Pregnancy - Ethical Dilemmas", Yonsei Medical Journal, 43(2), pp.252~258 (2002), 연세대학교의과대학
  29. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, "Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction", Fertil Steril, 90(5 Suppl), pp.S174~S177 (2008)
  30. Magli MC, "Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro", Hum Reprod, 15, pp.1781~1786 (2000)
  31. Staessen C, "Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial", Hum Reprod, 19, pp.2849~2858 (2004)
  32. Sandalinas M, "Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage", Hum Reprod, 16, pp.1954~1958 (2001)
  33. Strandell A, "Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction", Fertil Steril, 71, pp.282~286 (1999)
  34. Fanchin R, "Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers", Hum Reprod, 16, pp.1115~1119 (2001)
  35. Schoolcraft WB, "Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success", Fertil Steril, 76, pp.863~870 (2001)
  36. Gardner DK, "Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers", Fertil Steril, 69, pp.84~88 (1998)
  37. Ménézo YJ, "Time to switch from co-culture to sequential defined media for transfer at the blastocyst stage", Hum Reprod, 13, pp.2043~2044 (1998)
  38. Balaban B, "Comparison of two sequential media for culturing cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts: embryo characteristics and clinical outcome", Reprod Biomed Online, 10, pp.485~491 (2005)
  39. Van Royen E, "Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer", Hum Reprod, 14, pp.2345~2349 (1999)
  40. Coskun S, "Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial", Hum Reprod, 15, pp.1947~1952 (2000)
  41. Edwards RG, "Is the success of human IVF more a matter of genetics and evolution than growing blastocysts?", Hum Reprod, 14, pp.1~4 (1999)
  42. Scholtes MC, "Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age", Fertil Steril, 69, pp.78~83 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

Embryonic development in human oocytes fertilized by split insemination김묘선, 김자연, 박정연, 염혜원, 지병철, 최화영대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2015 · 제58권 제3호Clinical factors that affect the pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed embryo transfer in the freeze-all policy주종길, Eun Hye Jeon, Seo Yoon Hwang, Seung Chul Kim영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2020 · 제37권 제1호Clinical outcomes of vitrified-thawed embryo transfer using a pull and cut straw method김남형, 민병열, 민승기, 엄상준, 임준교, 허영태대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2013 · 제56권 제03호The clinical outcomes of fresh versus frozen embryos transfer in women ≥40 years with poor ovarian responseConghui Liu, Hong Jiang, Xiaomin Song, Yingchun Liu, Yu Li대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2021 · 제64권 제3호Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysisEkaterina Krylova, Laura Pivazyan, Leila Adamyan, Lilia Obosyan, Sapiyat Isaeva대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2024 · 제67권 제4호Long Cut Straw Provides Stable the Rates of Survival, Pregnancy and Live Birth for Vitrification of Human Blasotcysts김윤정, 김지해, 김혜영, 박경아, 박서영, 박춘근, 신선희, 안지현, 윤지성, 이슬기, 이정우, 차정호, 차혜진한국발생생물학회 · 발생과 생식2016 · 제20권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)