본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Unhappy Confucians, Take Heed! Reading Seoljam Kim Siseup’s Geumo sinhwa as Anti-Religious Propaganda-Fiction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Against the backdrop of different texts from the collected writings of Kim Siseup (dharma-name Seoljam), this article offers an against-the-grain reading of Kim’s famous collection of strange tales Geumo sinhwa (New Tales of the Golden Turtle). It is hypothesized that Kim’s life as well as his fictional and non-fictional literature can be viewed in the tradition of earlier Chinese and Korean anti-Buddhist Neo-Confucian thinkers such as Cheng Hao, Zhu Xi, or Jeong Dojeon. Through close-reading and by discussing such issues as funerary rites, burial practices, “unhappy” Confucians, and the persuasive power of storytelling, the author aims to show that Geumo sinhwa may be understood as a piece of narrative anti-religious propaganda-fiction meant to dissuade a specific 1460s younger Korean Neo-Confucian readership from turning toward seemingly soothing religion, and as an agenda-driven work designed to thwart a revival of Buddhism on the state level.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of different texts from the collected writings of Kim Siseup (dharma-name Seoljam), this article offers an against-the-grain reading of Kim’s famous collection of strange tales Geumo sinhwa (New Tales of the Golden Turtle). It is hypothesized that Kim’s life as well as his fictional and non-fictional literature can be viewed in the tradition of earlier Chinese and Korean anti-Buddhist Neo-Confucian thinkers such as Cheng Hao, Zhu Xi, or Jeong Dojeon. Through close-reading and by discussing such issues as funerary rites, burial practices, “unhappy” Confucians, and the persuasive power of storytelling, the author aims to show that Geumo sinhwa may be understood as a piece of narrative anti-religious propaganda-fiction meant to dissuade a specific 1460s younger Korean Neo-Confucian readership from turning toward seemingly soothing religion, and as an agenda-driven work designed to thwart a revival of Buddhism on the state level.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 돈 베이커, "Privatization of Buddhism in the Choson Dynasty", Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(2), pp.153~169 (2014), 동아시아학술원[DOI]
  2. Bol, Peter K., "This Culture of Ours : Intellectual Transition in T’ang and Sung China" (1992), Stanford University Press
  3. Brook, Timothy, "Praying for Power: Buddhism and the Formation of Gentry Society in Late Ming China" (1993), Harvard University Press
  4. Cha, Chu-hwan, "Kim Shi-sup and Taoism", Korea Journal, 26(5), pp.46~54 (1986)
  5. Chan, Wing-tsit, "vol.1 of Sources of Chinese Tradition. From Earliest Times to 1600", pp.689~690 (1999), Columbia University Press
  6. "2010", 16
  7. Choi, Yong Cherl, "2 vols" (2005), Somyung Books
  8. "1999", 32
  9. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley, "Chu Hsi’s Family Rituals: A Twelfth-Century Chinese Manual for the Performance of Cappings, Weddings, Funerals, and Ancestral Rites" (1991), Princeton University Press
  10. Evon, Gregory N., "The Lives and Legacy of Kim Sisŭp (1435–1493): Dissent and Creativity in Chosŏn Korea", pp.74~87 (2023), Brill
  11. Goulde, John Isaac, "Anti-Buddhist Polemic in Fourteenth and Fifteenth Century Korea: The Emergence of Confucian Exclusivism", PhD, pp.1985
  12. Hejtmanek, Milan, "The Subtle Path to Heterodoxy : Reflections on the Concept of ‘Yiduan’ in the Jinsilu", Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2(10), pp.16~23 (2013)
  13. Horlyck, Charlotte, "Death, Mourning, and the Afterlife in Korea: Ancient to Contemporary Times", pp.83~111 (2014), University of Hawai‘i Press
  14. 김창현, "<만복사저포기>에 나타난 불교와 비극성의 초극", 불교학보, (44), pp.247~265 (2006), 불교문화연구원
  15. Kim, Daeyeol, "The Lives and Legacy of Kim Sisŭp (1435–1493) Dissent and Creativity in Chosŏn Korea", pp.119~146 (2023), Brill
  16. (1977)[URL]
  17. Kim, Sung-Eun Thomas, "Silencing the Culture of Chosǒn Buddhism:The Ideology of Exclusion of the Chosǒn Wangjo Sillok", Journal of Korean Studies, 24(2), pp.289~313 (2019)
  18. "2013", 59
  19. 이창안, "조선 초 김시습의 시대인식과 儒佛融合", 원불교사상과 종교문화, (81), pp.313~340 (2019), 원불교사상연구원
  20. 이학주, "『金鰲新話』에 나타난 宗敎性과 敍述技法 - 傳奇小說 글쓰기의 特性 立場에서 -", 동방학, (31), pp.241~268 (2014), 동양고전연구소
  21. Mok, Jeongbae, "Buddhism in the Early Chosŏn: Suppression and Transformation", pp.117~162 (1996), UC Berkeley, Institute of East Asian Studies
  22. Muller, Charles, "Korea’s Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt’ong (Kihwa)" (2015), University of Hawai‘i Press
  23. Nam, Nguyen, "Writing as Response and as Translation: Jiandeng xinhua and the Evolution of the Chuanqi Genre in East Asia, Particularly in Vietnam", PhD, pp.2005
  24. Pang-White, Ann A., "Female Chastity in Confucianism : Genealogy and Radicalization", Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 49, pp.50~63 (2022)
  25. Plassen, Jörg, "Zen Buddhist Rhetoric in China, Korea, and Japan", pp.363~379 (2012), Brill
  26. "2004", 25
  27. Taylor, Philip M., "Munitions of the Mind: A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present" (2003), Manchester University Press
  28. Ven. Haeju, "Hwaŏm I: The Mainstream Tradition", pp.42~48 (2012), Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism
  29. Vermeersch, Sem, "Death, Mourning, and the Afterlife in Korea: Ancient to Contemporary Times", pp.21~56 (2014), University of Hawai‘i Press
  30. Wuerthner, Dennis, "Tales of the Strange by a Korean Confucian Monk:Kǔmo sinhwa by Kim Sisǔp" (2020), University of Hawai‘i Press
  31. Wuerthner, Dennis, "The Lives and Legacy of Kim Sisŭp (1435–1493): Dissent and Creativity in Chosŏn Korea", pp.34~73 (2023), Brill
  32. "Gungmunhak nonjip", 1994, 253~281

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)