Use of Darunavir-Cobicistat as a Treatment Option for Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who wereadmitted to an intensive care unit in Daegu, South Korea. The outcomes of patients who did (cases) or did not (controls) receivedarunavir-cobicistat (800–150 mg) therapy were compared. Fourteen patients received darunavir-cobicistat treatment, and 96 receivedother antiviral therapy (controls). Overall, the darunavir-cobicistat group comprised patients with milder illness, and thecrude mortality rate of all patients in the darunavir-cobicistat group was lower than that in the controls [odds ratio (OR) 0.20, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.04–0.89, p=0.035]. After 1:2 propensity-score matching, there were 14 patients in the darunavir-cobicistatgroup, and 28 patients in the controls. In propensity score-matched analysis, the darunavir-cobicistat group had lower mortalitythan the controls (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.52, p=0.009). In conclusion, darunavir-cobicistat therapy was found to be associatedwith a significant survival benefit in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Abstract
We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who wereadmitted to an intensive care unit in Daegu, South Korea. The outcomes of patients who did (cases) or did not (controls) receivedarunavir-cobicistat (800–150 mg) therapy were compared. Fourteen patients received darunavir-cobicistat treatment, and 96 receivedother antiviral therapy (controls). Overall, the darunavir-cobicistat group comprised patients with milder illness, and thecrude mortality rate of all patients in the darunavir-cobicistat group was lower than that in the controls [odds ratio (OR) 0.20, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.04–0.89, p=0.035]. After 1:2 propensity-score matching, there were 14 patients in the darunavir-cobicistatgroup, and 28 patients in the controls. In propensity score-matched analysis, the darunavir-cobicistat group had lower mortalitythan the controls (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.52, p=0.009). In conclusion, darunavir-cobicistat therapy was found to be associatedwith a significant survival benefit in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
참고문헌 (8)
- Chu CM, "Role of lopinavir", ritonavir in the treatment of SARS : initial virological and clinical findings, 2004, pp.59, 252~256
- "Abidol and darunavir can effectively inhibit coronavirus"[URL]
- Dong L, "Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)", Drug Discov Ther, 14, pp.58~60 (2020)
- James M. Sanders, "Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)", JAMA (2020), American Medical Association (AMA)[DOI]
- Curran A, "Rezolsta®(darunavir", cobicistat) : first boosted protease inhibitor co-formulated with cobicistat, 2015, pp.17, 114~120
- Putcharoen O, "Rationale and clinical utility of the darunavir-cobicistat combination in the treatment of HIV", AIDS, 2015, pp.9, 5763~5769
- Zanon D, "Data on the stability of darunavir", cobicistat suspension after tablet manipulation, 2020, pp.30, 105552~
- Cao B, "A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19", N Engl J Med, 382, pp.1787~1799 (2020)
