Analysis of tetracyclines in shrimp samples based on a two-step extraction approach prior to high-performance liquid chromatography
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study presents a sensitive and reliable method for determining tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC), and chlortetracycline (CTC) residues in shrimp samples. A two-step process involving liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) was developed prior to HPLC analysis. The target analytes were effectively extracted using EDTA/McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0): methanol (80:20, %v/v), with subsequent clean-up using a C18 SPE cartridge. HPLC separation was conducted on a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) at 30 °C, using 0.01 % trifluoroacetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) as the mobile phase. A gradient elution protocol was applied, transitioning from 85(A):15(B) %v/v to 70(A):30(B) %v/v at 7 min, with a 5 min hold, followed by adjustment to 85(A):15(B) %v/v for 13-14 min. The detection was performed using photodiode array (PDA) at 365 nm with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The calibration curves exhibited good linearity within a concentration range of 0.4-6.0 µg/mL (R2 ˃ 0.995). The limits of detection (LOD) for TC, OTC, and CTC in shrimp were 0.034, 0.029, and 0.021 µg/mL, respectively. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) for TC, OTC, and CTC were found to be 0.114, 0.097, and 0.071 µg/mL, respectively. Recoveries of TC, OTC, and CTC from spiked shrimp samples ranged from 91.0 % to 95.5 %, 92.4 % to 97.2 %, and 93.3 % to 96.6 %, respectively. This method was successfully applied to the determination of TC, OTC, and CTC residues in shrimp samples sourced from various local markets
Abstract
This study presents a sensitive and reliable method for determining tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC), and chlortetracycline (CTC) residues in shrimp samples. A two-step process involving liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) was developed prior to HPLC analysis. The target analytes were effectively extracted using EDTA/McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0): methanol (80:20, %v/v), with subsequent clean-up using a C18 SPE cartridge. HPLC separation was conducted on a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) at 30 °C, using 0.01 % trifluoroacetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) as the mobile phase. A gradient elution protocol was applied, transitioning from 85(A):15(B) %v/v to 70(A):30(B) %v/v at 7 min, with a 5 min hold, followed by adjustment to 85(A):15(B) %v/v for 13-14 min. The detection was performed using photodiode array (PDA) at 365 nm with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The calibration curves exhibited good linearity within a concentration range of 0.4-6.0 µg/mL (R2 ˃ 0.995). The limits of detection (LOD) for TC, OTC, and CTC in shrimp were 0.034, 0.029, and 0.021 µg/mL, respectively. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) for TC, OTC, and CTC were found to be 0.114, 0.097, and 0.071 µg/mL, respectively. Recoveries of TC, OTC, and CTC from spiked shrimp samples ranged from 91.0 % to 95.5 %, 92.4 % to 97.2 %, and 93.3 % to 96.6 %, respectively. This method was successfully applied to the determination of TC, OTC, and CTC residues in shrimp samples sourced from various local markets
참고문헌 (27)
- T. P. Gustavo, , Food Control, 21(5), pp.620~625 (2010)[DOI]
- A. O. Oyedeji, , Toxicol. Rep, 6, pp.951~956 (2019)[DOI]
- L. T. Giang, , Vietnam J. Chem, 57(6), pp.758~764 (2019)[DOI]
- Y. Hua, , J. Food Compos. Anal, 144, pp.104821~ (2022)[DOI]
- X. Hui, , Food Chem, 232, pp.198~202 (2017)[DOI]
- N. Ma, , Food Anal. Methods, 13(14), pp.1211~1219 (2020)[DOI]
- M. X. Feng, , Food Control, 69, pp.171~176 (2016)[DOI]
- P. P. Maia, , Food Chem, 109(1), pp.212~218 (2008)[DOI]
- R. Mirzajani, , Food Chem, 314, pp.126179~ (2020)[DOI]
- K. Fatemeh, , Food Chemistry Advances, 2(12), pp.100173~ (2022)[DOI]
- M. David, , Food Chem, 221, pp.1763~1769 (2017)[DOI]
- H. Sereshti, , Microchem. J, 163, pp.105914~ (2020)[DOI]
- Y. Pang, , Food Chem, 355, pp.129411~ (2021)[DOI]
- Z. Stephanie, , Food Chem, 402, pp.134270~ (2023)[DOI]
- C. Chandrakar, , Food Control, 148(4), pp.109667~ (2023)[DOI]
- Z. Fei, , J. Food Compos. Anal, 116(7), pp.105082~ (2022)[DOI]
- A. Saghafi, , Chem. Pap, 76(2), pp.901~911 (2021)[DOI]
- P. Nattaphorn, , J. Chromatogr. A, 1519, pp.38~44 (2017)[DOI]
- R. Mirzajani, , Mikrochim. Acta, 186(3), pp.186~199 (2019)[DOI]
- G. Jiajia, , Food Chem, 215, pp.138~148 (2017)[DOI]
- P. Ewelina, , J. Vet. Res, 60, pp.35~41 (2016)[DOI]
- A. Fatimah, , Saudi Pharm. J, 29(6), pp.566~575 (2021)[DOI]
- F. Johnathan, , Food Chem, 105(3), pp.1297~1301 (2007)[DOI]
- A. K. Biswas, , J. Food Drug Anal, 15(3), pp.278~284 (2007)[DOI]
- C. A. Wendy, , Anal. Chim. Acta, 529, pp.145~150 (2005)[DOI]
- O. O. Abdulrasaq, , Heliyon, 7(12), pp.e08469~ (2021)[DOI]
- C. L. Chen, , J. AOAC Int, 78(6), pp.1369~1377 (1995)
