악마의 변호기법을 이용한 후판단편파의 감소

키워드

참고문헌 (108)

1. 이형권, "회계의사결정에서 악마의 변호는 지식의 저주에 영향을 미치는가?", 회계연구, 8(1), pp.19~50 (2003)
2. 최이문, "인지적 분주함과 설명의무가 사후과잉확신 편향에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 16, pp.35~52 (2002)
3. 최인철, "사후과잉확신편향과 인과추론", 한국심리학회지:일반, 23, pp.137~152 (2004)
4. Anderson,J.C, "The Mitigation of Hindsight Bias in Judges' Evaluation of Auditor Decisions", Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16, pp.20~39 (1997)
5. Anderson,J.C, "Evaluation of Auditor Decisions:Hindsight Bias Effects and the Expectation Gap", Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, pp.711~737 (1993)
6. Argote,L, "The Base-rate Fallacy:Contrasting Processes and Outcomes of Group and Individual Judgment", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, pp.296~311 (1990)
7. Arkes,H.R, "Hindsight Bias among Physicians-Weighting the Likelihood of Diagnoses", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, pp.252~254 (1981)
8. Asare,S.K, "The Auditors' Going Concern Decision:Interaction of Task Variables and the Sequential Processing of Evidence", The Accounting Review, 67, pp.379~393 (1992)
9. Baron,J., "Outcome Bias in Decision Evaluation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, pp.569~579 (1988)
10. Baron,R.M., "The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual,Strategic,and Statistical Considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp.1173~1182 (1986)
11. Boiney,L.G, "Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning:More When More is Needed", Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 72(1), pp.1~24 (1997)
12. Brannon,L.A, "The Moderating Role of Attitude Strength in Selective Exposure to Information", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, pp.611~617 (2007)
13. Brodbeck,F.C, "The Dissemination of Critical,Unshared Information in Decision-making Groups:The Effects of Pre-discussion Dissent", European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, pp.35~56 (2002)
14. Brown,C.E., "Effects of Outcome Information on Evaluations of Managerial Decisions", The Accounting Review, 62, pp.564~577 (1987)
15. Brown,C.E., "An Experimental Investigation of Explanations for Outcome Effects on Appraisals of Capital-budgeting Decisions", Contemporary Accounting Research, 10, pp.83~111 (1993)
16. Bukszar,E., "Hindsight Bias and Strategic Choice:A Meta-analysis", Academy of Management Journal, 31, pp.628~641 (1988)
17. Burnstein,E., "Persuasive Augmentation and Social Comparison as Determinants of Attitude Polarization", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, pp.315~332 (1977)
18. Butt,J., "The Effects of Information Order and Hypothesis-testing Strategies on Auditors' Judgments", AccountingOrganizations and Society, 14, pp.471~479 (1989)
19. Casper,J.D.,, "Cognition,Attitudes and Decision-making in Search and Seizure Cases", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, pp.93~113 (1988)
20. Christensen-Szalanski,J.J.J., "The Hindsight Bias:A Meta-analysis", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, pp.147~168 (1991)
21. Church,B, "An Examination of the Effect that Commitment to a Hypothesis has on Auditors' Evaluations of Confirming and Disconfirming Evidence", Contemporary Accounting Research, 7, pp.513~534 (1991)
22. Earley,C.E, "A Note on Self-explanation as a Training Tool for Novice Auditors:The Effects of Outcome Feedback Timing and Level of Reasoning on Performance", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15, pp.111~124 (2003)
23. Edwards,K., "A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), pp.5~24 (1996)
24. Emby,C, "A Research Note on the Influence of Outcome Knowledge on Audit Partners' Judgments", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, pp.87~103 (2002)
25. Esser,J.K, "Alive and Well after 25 Years:A Review of Groupthink Research", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, pp.116~141 (1998)
26. Festinger,L, "A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance" (1957), Stanford University Press
27. Fischhoff,B, "Hindsight≠foresight:The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 1, pp.288~299 (1975)
28. Fischhoff,B, "Perceived Informativeness of Facts", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 3, pp.349~358 (1977)
29. Fisher,J., "The Outcome Effect in Performance Evaluation:Decision Process Observability and Consensus", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, pp.58~77 (1993)
30. Frey,D, "Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information.In L.Berkowitz(Eds.)", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, pp.40~80 (1986), New York:Academic Press.
31. Galinsky,A.D., "From Thinking About What Might Have Been to Sharing What We Know:The Effects of Counterfactual Mind-sets on Information Sharing in Groups", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, pp.606~618 (2004)
32. Galinsky,A.D., "Counterfactuals as Behavioral Primes:Priming the Simulation Heuristic and Consideration of Alternatives", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, pp.384~409 (2000)
33. Gigone,D., "The Common Knowledge Effect:Information Sharing and Group Judgment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp.959~974 (1993)
34. Gigone,D., "The Impact of Information on Small Group Choice", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, pp.132~140 (1997)
35. Greitemyer,T., "Preference-Consistent Evaluation of Information in the Hidden Profile Paradigm: Beyond Group-level Explanations for the Dominance of Shared Information in Group Decisions" (2003), Journal of Personality and Social Psych
36. Hart,P, "Preventing Groupthink Revisited:Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, pp.306~326 (1998)
37. Hasher,L.M, "I knew-it-along: Or, Did I?", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, pp.86~96 (1981)
38. Hastie,R, "Juror Judgments in Civil Cases:Hindsight Effects on Judgments of Liability for Punitive Damages", Law and Human Behavior, 23, pp.597~614 (1999)
39. Hawkins,S.A., "Hindsight:Biased Judgments of Past Events After the Outcomes are Known", Psychological Bulletin, 107, pp.311~327 (1990)
40. Hershey,J.C, "Judgment by Outcomes:When is it Justified", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, pp.89~93 (1992)
41. Jennings,M.M, "Causality as an Influence on Hindsight Bias:An Empirical Examination of Judges' Evaluation of Professional Audit Judgment", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21, pp.143~167 (1998)
42. Jonas,E., "Information Search and Presentation in Advisor-client Interactions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, pp.154~168 (2003)
43. Jonas,E, "Confirmation Bias in Sequential Information Search after Preliminary Decisions: An Expansion of Dissonance Theoretical Research on Selective Exposure to Information" (2001), Journal of Personality and Soc
44. Kadous,K, "Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases", Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, pp.425~444 (2001)
45. Kamin,K.A., "Ex post≠Ex ante:Determining Liability in Hindsight", Law and Human Behavior, 19, pp.89~104 (1995)
46. Kaplan,S., "An Examination of Information Search during Initial Audit Planning", AccountingOrganizations and Society, 14, pp.539~550 (1989)
47. Katzenstein,G, "The Debate on Structured Debate:Toward a Unified Theory", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(3), pp.316~332 (1996)
48. Kennedy,J, "Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability:A Framework and Experimental Results", Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), pp.231~245 (1993)
49. Kennedy,J, "Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment", The Accounting Review, 70, pp.249~273 (1995)
50. Kida,T, "The Impact of Hypothesis-testing Strategies on Auditor's Use of Judgment Data", Journal of Accounting Research, 22, pp.332~340 (1984)
51. Kinney,Jr.W.R., "Outcome Information and the"Expectation Gap":The Case of Loss Contingencies", Journal of Accounting Research, 34, pp.281~299 (1996)
52. Klayman,J., "Confirmation,Disconfirmation,and Information in Hypothesis Testing", Psychological Review, 94(2), pp.211~228 (1987)
53. Klayman,J., "Hypothesis Testing in Rule Discovery:Strategy,Structure and Content", Journal of Experimental Psychology:LearningMemoryand Cognition, 15, pp.596~604 (1989)
54. Klein,W.M., "Motivated Person Perception:Constructing Justifications for Desired Beliefs", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, pp.145~168 (1992)
55. Klein,W.M., "Maintaining Self-serving Social Comparisons:Biased Reconstruction of One's Past Behaviors", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, pp.732~739 (1993)
56. Koehler,D.J, "Explanation,Imagination,and Confidence in Judgment", Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), pp.499~519 (1991)
57. Koehler,J.J, "The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, pp.28~55 (1993)
58. Kray,L.J., "The Debiasing Effect of Counterfactual Mind-set:Increasing the Search for Disconfirmatory Information in Group Decisions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, pp.69~81 (2003)
59. Kunda,Z, "Motivation and Inference:Self-serving Generation and Evaluation of Evidence", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.636~647 (1987)
60. Kunda,Z., "Motivated Changes in the Self-concept", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, pp.272~285 (1989)
61. Leary,M.R, "The Distorted Nature of Hindsight Bias", Journal of Social Psychology, 115, pp.25~29 (1981)
62. Leary,M.R, "Hindsight Distortion and the 1980 Presidential Election", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, pp.257~263 (1982)
63. Lindman,H.R, "Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs" (1974), W.H.Freeman and Company.
64. Lord,C.G, "Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization:The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp.2098~2109 (1979)
65. Lowe,D.J., "The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Decisions", Decision Sciences, 25, pp.401~426 (1994)
66. Lowe,D.J., "The Influence of Outcome Effects,Decision Aid Usage,and Intolerance of Ambiguity on Evaluations of Professional Audit Judgment", International Journal of Auditing, 1, pp.43~59 (1997)
67. Lowe,D.J., "The Use of Foresight Decision Aids in Auditors' Judgments", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 12, pp.97~118 (2000)
68. Lundgren,S.R., "Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(7), pp.715~726 (1998)
69. McMillan,J., "Auditors' Belief Revisions and Evidence Search:The Effect of Hypothesis Frame,Confirmation Bias,and Professional Scepticism", The Accounting Review, 68, pp.443~465 (1993)
70. Michell,T.R., "Effects of Outcome Knowledge and Outcome Valence on Supervisors' Evaluations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, pp.604~612 (1981)
71. Mussweiler,T., "Hypothesis-Consistent Testing and Semantic Priming in the Anchoring Paradigm:A Selective Accessibility Model", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, pp.136~164 (1999)
72. Mussweiler,T, "Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect:Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), pp.1142~1150 (2000)
73. Nemeth,C.,, "Devil's Advocate versus Authentic Dissent:Stimulating Quantity and Quality", European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, pp.707~720 (2001)
74. Northcraft,G.B., "Experts,Amateurs,and Real Estate:An Anchoring-and-adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decision", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, pp.84~97 (1987)
75. Ofir,C., "Does a Surprising Outcome Reinforce or Reverse the Hindsight Bias", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, pp.51~57 (1997)
76. Pei,B, "Auditor Belief Revisions in a Performance Audit Setting:An Application of the Belief-Adjustment Model", AccountingOrganizations and Society, 17, pp.169~183 (1992)
77. Peterson,B.K, "An Examination of the Positive Test Strategy in Auditors' Hypothesis Testing", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 12, pp.257~278 (2000)
78. Pohl,R., "No Reduction in Hindsight Bias after Complete Information and Repeated Testing", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, pp.49~58 (1996)
79. Reimers,J., "The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Auditors' Judgmental Evaluations", AccountingOrganizations and Society, 17, pp.185~194 (1992)
80. Robbennolt,J.K., "An Integration of Hindsight Bias and Counterfactual Thinking:Decision-making and Drug Courier Profiles", Law and Human Behavior, 21, pp.539~560 (1997)
81. Roese,N.J., "Counterfactuals,Causal Attributions,and the Hindsight Bias:A Conceptual Integration", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, pp.197~227 (1996)
82. Russo,J.E, "The Distortion of Information During Decisions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1), pp.102~110 (1996)
83. Sanna,L.J., "Debiasing the Hindsight:The Role of Accessibility Experiences and(Mis)Attributions", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, pp.287~295 (2003)
84. Sanna,L.J, "When Debiasing Backfires: Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences in Debiasing Hindsight Biasv", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, pp.497~502 (2002)
85. Schulz-Hardt,S, "Biased Information Search in Group Decision Making", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), pp.655~669 (2000)
86. Schulz-Hardt,S, "Productive Conflict in Group Decision Making:Genuine and Contrived Dissent as Strategies to Counteract Biased Information Seeking", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, pp.563~586 (2002)
87. Schweiger,D.M, "Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry,Devil's Advocacy,and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making", Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp.745~772 (1989)
88. Schwenk,C.R, "Effects of Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Decision Making:a Meta-analysis", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, pp.161~176 (1990)
89. Snyder,M., "Hypotheses Testing Processes in Social Interaction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, pp.1202~1212 (1978)
90. Stallard,M.J, "Reducing the Hindsight Bias Utilizing Attorney Closing Arguments", Law and Human Behavior, 22, pp.671~683 (1998)
91. Stasser,G., "Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-making Groups:Solving a Problem versus Making a Judgment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp.426~434 (1992)
92. Stasser,G., "Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making:Biased Information Sampling during Discussion", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp.1467~1478 (1985)
93. Stewart,D.D., "The Sampling of Critical,Unshared Information in Decision-making Groups:The Role of an Informed Minority", European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, pp.95~113 (1998)
94. Switzer,F.S.Ⅲ., "Judgment Processes in Motivation:Anchoring and Adjustment Effects on Judgment and Behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, pp.208~229 (1991)
95. Synodinos,N.E, "Hindsight Distortion:"I-knew-it-all-along and I was Sure about it", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, pp.107~117 (1986)
96. Tan,H., "Outcome Effects:The Impact of Decision Process and Outcome Controllability", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, pp.315~325 (1997)
97. Trope,Y., "Social Hypothesis Testing: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms", pp.239~270 (1996), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York, Guilford.
98. Trotman,K., "The Effect of Hypothesis Framing,Prior Expectations and Cue Diagnosticity on Auditors' Information Choice", AccountingOrganizations and Society, 14, pp.565~576 (1989)
99. Tversky,A., "Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases", Science, 185, pp.1124~1131 (1974)
100. Valacich,J., "Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Group Decision Making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), pp.158~173 (1995)
101. Wason,P.C, "On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, pp.129~140 (1960)
102. Wasserman,D.R, "Hindsight and Causality", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, pp.30~35 (1991)
103. Wilson,T.D, "A New Look at Anchoring Effects:Basic Anchoring and its Antecedents", Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 4, pp.387~402 (1996)
104. Winer,B.J, "Statistical Principles in Experimental Design" (1971), McGraw-Hill Book Company.
105. Winquist,J.R., "Information Pooling:When it Impacts Group Decision Making", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp.371~377 (1998)
106. Wright,E.F, "Does Group Discussion Facilitate the Use of Consensus Information in Making Causal Attributions?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, pp.261~269 (1990)
107. Wright,E.F., "Does Group Discussion Attenuate the Disposition Bias?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 15, pp.531~546 (1985)
108. Zdaniuk,B., "Anticipated Interaction and Thought Generation:The Role of Faction Size", British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, pp.201~218 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천