본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제1대구치 위치에 식립된 단일 임플란트의 지대주 연결 유형에 따른 임플란트 주위골 흡수

Marginal bone loss between internal- and external- abutment connection type implants placed in the first molar area

이은우|김옥수|정하나|이석현
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean academy of stomatognathic function and occlusion)|2023.03|구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)|제39권 제1호|pp. 32-44

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

임플란트 안정성변연골 흡수implant stabilitymarginal bone lossemergence angle지대주 연결 방식보철물 출현 각도abutment connection type
주제분류치의학

초록

목적: 이번 연구는 상∙하악 제1대구치 부위에 식립 된 단일 임플란트를 통해 임플란트-지대주 연결 유형이 임플란트의 변연골 소실 (MBL)에 영향을 주는지, 그리고 MBL에 영향을 끼치는 요인들을 알아보기 위해 분석하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 5년 이상의 추적 기간 동안, 상∙하악 제1대구치 부위에 단일 임플란트를 식립하여 수복한 68명의 환자(남: 38명, 여: 30명)의 87 임플란트(external connection type (EC) 임플란트: 57개, internal connection type (IC) 임플란트: 30개)를 대상으로 추적 조사하였다. 최대 5년 후의 구내 방사선 영상에서 MBL과 보철물의 출현 각도(EA)를 측정하였다. 60 - 79세에 해당하는 환자의 비율이 52.9%로 가장 높았고 상악 구치부에 임플란트가 가장 많이 식립되었다. 결과: GBR을 하지 않은 경우 EC (-0.065 ± 0.859 mm)와 IC (-0.627 ± 0.639 mm)에서 유의한 차이가 있었고, 또한 당뇨병이 없는 환자들 사이에서 EC (-0.131 ± 1.002 mm)와 IC (-0.792 ± 0.762 mm)에서 유의한 차이가 존재하였다. 임플란트 매식체의 직경, 길이, 보철물 연결 방법, 임플란트 제조업체, 보철물의 emergence angle (EA)로 구분하였을 때 각 군 간에 유의미한 차이가 없었다. 다중회귀분석을 이용하여 MBL에 영향을 주는 요인분석 결과 회귀계수의 유의성 검증에서 임플란트-지대주 체결 방식(β = -0.303), 당뇨병의 유무(β = -0.113), EA의 차이(β = -0.234), 나이(β = -0.776)에서 MBL에 통계학적으로 유의한 음의 상관관계를 보였다. 결론: IC가 EC보다 GBR을 하지 않은 경우와 당뇨병이 없는 환자들 사이에서 MBL이 작다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 또한 보철물의 EA가 30°보다 큰 보철물의 형태를 가진 임플란트가 30°보다 작은 보철물의 형태를 가진 임플란트 보다 MBL이 컸으며 나이가 많을수록 MBL이 크다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 임플란트의 MBL을 최소화하고 임플란트 안정성을 확보하기 위해서 임플란트 보철물의 EA와 임플란트-지대주 연결 유형을 세심하게 고려해야 할 것이다.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant connection type on marginal bone loss (MBL) and to analyze the factors that affect MBL. This study focuses on single implants planted in the upper and lower first molar area. Materials and Methods: A total of 87 implants from 68 patients were tracked for a period over 5 years. There were 57 external connection type (EC) implants and 30 internal connection type (IC) implants in 38 males and 30 females. The MBL and EA were measured from intraoral radiograph images taken after 5 years at most. Results: Significant difference in MBL between EC and IC type was observed in patients without GBR or diabetes. Patients without GBR exhibited an MBL of -0.065 ± 0.859 mm in EC type and -0.627 ± 0.639 mm in IC type (P = 0.025). Using multiple regression analysis, a statistically significant negative correlation was observed between MBL and conditions including implant-abutment connection type (β = -0.303), diabetes (β = -0.113), emergence angle > 30° (β = -0.234), and age (β = -0.776). Conclusion: Within this results, IC type implants had less MBL than EC type, and implant prosthesis with emergence angle over 30° showed greater MBL. To minimize the MBL of the implant and ensure implant stability, careful consideration should be given to the EA of implant prosthesis and its connection type.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Brånemark Pl, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
  2. Esposito M, "Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointergrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis", Eur J Oral Sci, 106, pp.721~764 (1998)
  3. Aparna IN, "Implant crest module : a review of biomechanical considerations", Indian J Dent Res, 23, pp.257~263 (2012)
  4. Chou CT, "AICRG, Part II : Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant : Loading to 36 months", J Oral Implantol, 30, pp.134~143 (2004)
  5. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
  6. Goiato MC, "Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 19, pp.229~242 (2015)
  7. Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
  8. Romeo E, "Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches : a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.247~259 (2004)
  9. Laine P, "Failed dental implants-clinical, radiological and bacteriological findings in 17 patients", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 33, pp.212~217 (2005)
  10. Behneke A, "A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.799~810 (2002)
  11. Atieh MA, "Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants : a systematic review and metaanalysis", J Periodontol, 81, pp.1350~1366 (2010)
  12. Jones AA, "Consequences of implant design", Dent Clin North Am, 50, pp.339~360 (2006)
  13. Pozzi A, "Clinical and radiological outcomes of two implants with different prosthetic interfaces and neck configurations : randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 16, pp.96~106 (2014)
  14. Calvo-Guirado JL, "Marginal bone loss evaluation around immediate non-occlusal microthreaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxilla : a 3-year study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.761~767 (2015)
  15. Canullo L, "Inward-inclined implant platform for the amplified platform-switching concept : 18-month follow-up report of a prospective randomized matched-pair controlled trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.927~934 (2012)
  16. Koo KT, "The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants : a radiographic analysis", J Periodontol, 83, pp.1104~1109 (2012)
  17. Schwarz F, "Impact of implantabutment connection, positioning of the machined collar", microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report, 2014, pp.25, 1301~1303
  18. Pieri F, "Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants : a randomized controlled clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.169~178 (2011)
  19. Shin YK, "Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.789~794 (2006)
  20. Quirynen M, "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
  21. Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations : a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
  22. Maeda Y, "In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections : a short communication", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.75~78 (2006)
  23. Laurell L, "Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function : a metaanalysis", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 13, pp.19~28 (2011)
  24. Pozzi A, "Three-year postloading results of a randomized, controlled, splitmouth trial comparing implants with different prosthetic interfaces and design in partially posterior edentulous mandibles", Eur J Oral Implantol, 7, pp.47~61 (2014)
  25. Peñarrocha-Diago MA, "Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.1192~1200 (2013)
  26. Crespi R, "Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.920~926 (2009)
  27. Lin MI, "A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level", J Dent Res, 92(Suppl 12), pp.S202~7 (2013)
  28. Kielbassa AM, "Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant : interim one-year results", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.293~305 (2009)
  29. Fickl S, "Periimplant bone level around implants with platformswitched abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.577~581 (2010)
  30. Zechner W, "Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evalutation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.873~878 (2003)
  31. Kullman L, "Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.96~100 (2007)
  32. Dae-Hyun Kim, "Comparison of marginal bone loss between internal- and externalconnection dental implants in posterior areas without periodontal or peri-implant disease", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 48(2), pp.103~113 (2018), 대한치주과학회
  33. Liu Z, "Prevalence of chronic complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in outpatients-a cross-sectional hospital based survey in urban China", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, pp.62~ (2010)
  34. Wu YY, "Diabetes mellitus related bone metabolism and periodontal disease", Int J Oral Sci, 7, pp.63~72 (2015)
  35. Iacopino AM, "Periodontitis and diabetes interrelationships : role of inflammation", Ann Periodontol, 6, pp.125~137 (2001)
  36. Souto-Maior JR, "Influence of diabetes on the survival rate and marginal bone loss of dental implants : An overview of systematic reviews", J Oral Implantol, 45, pp.334~340 (2019)
  37. Negri M, "The effect of age, gender, and insertion site on marginal bone loss around endosseous implants : results from a 3-year trial with premium implant system", Biomed Res Int, 2014, pp.369051~ (2014)
  38. Katafuchi M, "Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis : A cross-sectional radiographic analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 45, pp.225~232 (2018)
  39. Yi Y, "Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis : A cross-sectional study", J Clin Periodontol, 47, pp.392~403 (2020)
  40. Inoue M, "Multivariate analysis of the influence of prosthodontic factors on peri-implant bleeding index and marginal bone level in a molar site : A cross-sectional study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 22, pp.713~722 (2022)
  41. Tallarico M, "Microbial colonization at the implant-abutment interface and its possible influence on periimplantitis : A systematic review and meta-analysis", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.233~241 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of marginal bone loss between internal- and externalconnection dental implants in posterior areas without periodontal or peri-implant disease구기태, 김성태, Dae-Hyun Kim, Hyun Ju Kim, In-Chul Rhyu, Tae-Il Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee, Young Ku대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2018 · 제48권 제2호Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants김영민, 엄흥식, 이재관, 이종빈, 장범석대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2022 · 제52권 제6호즉시 하중 임플란트에서 변연골 흡수량에 관한 후향적 연구이성훈, 이진한, 정지혜, 조혜원대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2018 · 제56권 제2호Influence of implant-abutment connection structure on peri-implant bone level in a second molar: A 1-year randomized controlled trial구기태, 김성태, 김진철, 김혜영, 여인성, 이정원대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제3호임플란트 장기간 유지와 변연골 소실에 영향을 주는 요인들에 대한 후향적 연구김옥수, 이은우, 정하나, 조유진대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2022 · 제38권 제2호하악 구치 단일임플란트 수복에서 임플란트 길이에 따른 치관-임플란트 비율이 임플란트안정성 및 변연골소실에 주는 영향권호범, 김명주, 김봉주, 백연화, 임영준대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2018 · 제34권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

치주수술 후 치아상실에 대한 환자관련, 치아관련 위험요소 - 후향적 연구휴팜동, 송종근, 이성조, 신현승, 조인우pp. 1-8임플란트 인상채득 방법과 인상용 코핑 연결 고정에 따른 정확성 비교홍기윤, 신수연pp. 9-20한국 청소년의 정신건강 요인과 구강 증상 경험의 관련성홍민희, 최다예, 배정희pp. 21-31Lid technique을 활용하여 치근단 수술에서 역충전을 시행한 증례 보고이윤주, 이윤, 김진우, 박세희, 조경모pp. 45-51Replantation of autotransplanted mature third molar in anterior open bite patient: case report김희진pp. 52-60
원문 보기