Use of Advanced Energy Devices and Fiberoptic Retractors in Single-Incision Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes. Results: The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, p=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, p=0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, p=0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, p=0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, p=0.523). Conclusion: Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.
Abstract
Purpose: The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes. Results: The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, p=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, p=0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, p=0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, p=0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, p=0.523). Conclusion: Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.
참고문헌 (14)
- Fisher B, "Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 312, pp.665~673 (1985)
- Fisher B, "Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer : findings from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18", J Clin Oncol, 15, pp.2483~2493 (1997)
- Fisher B, "Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation", N Engl J Med, 312, pp.674~681 (1985)
- Veronesi U, "Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer : long-term results", Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 22, pp.1085~1089 (1986)
- Veronesi U, "A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 349, pp.546~553 (2003)
- Mansel RE, "Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer : the ALMANAC trial", J Natl Cancer Inst, 98, pp.599~609 (2006)
- Kiebert GM, "The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of earlystage breast cancer patients : a review", J Clin Oncol, 9, pp.1059~1070 (1991)
- Moyer A, "Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy : a meta-analytic review", Health Psychol, 16, pp.284~298 (1997)
- Nano MT, "Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies", ANZ J Surg, 75, pp.940~947 (2005)
- Lai HW, "Endoscopic assisted breast conserving surgery for breast cancer : clinical outcome, learning curve, and patient reported aesthetic results from preliminary 100 procedures", Eur J Surg Oncol, 46, pp.1446~1455 (2020)
- Gambardella C, "Advanced hemostasis in axillary lymph node dissection for locally advanced breast cancer : new technology devices compared in the prevention of seroma formation", BMC Surg, 18(Suppl 1), pp.125~ (2019)
- Broderick JM, "Minimally invasive fasciotomy using a lighted retractor in the treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 28, pp.2309499019892800~ (2020)
- Acea-Nebril B, "Single-incision approach for breast-conserving surgery : effectiveness, complications and quality of life", Ann Surg Oncol, 26, pp.2466~2474 (2019)
- Park HS, "The feasibility of endoscopy-assisted breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer", J Breast Cancer, 14, pp.52~57 (2011)