다수당사자의 채권관계 - 일본에서의 공동임차인의 법률관계를 중심으로 -
The Legal Relation of Plurality of Debtors - Focused on the Joint Lessees in Japan -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Japanese former civil law is enacted in base of French civil law by Bossonade. Japanese existing civil law has two types about co-obligation. one is the 'indivisible obligation', the other is the 'joint obligation. Korean civil law is very similar to Japanese that about the article of co-obligation. This paper is concerned about co-obligation focused on joint lessee, demonstrated Korean & Japanese civil law about co-obligation. Japanese civil law about it is compared to Korean that in this paper. In Korea, joint lessees bear the responsibility 'jointly' by civil code §654. But in Japan, their responsibility is treated case by case theoretically. The divided obligation is a fundamental rule in co-obligation. But It can be the indivisible obligation, joint obligation and ungenuine joint obligation case by case. They are different one after another delicately. That is, in japan, civil legislator tried to pursue a flexibility in concerned of 'joint lessees.'We have to give attention to that the division in them is being collapsed. Indivisible obligation and joint obligation is treated samely in reality. And we cannot discover easily bases that separate joint obligation from ungenuine joint obligation. I wish you could understand it easily and clearly by this paper.
Abstract
Japanese former civil law is enacted in base of French civil law by Bossonade. Japanese existing civil law has two types about co-obligation. one is the 'indivisible obligation', the other is the 'joint obligation. Korean civil law is very similar to Japanese that about the article of co-obligation. This paper is concerned about co-obligation focused on joint lessee, demonstrated Korean & Japanese civil law about co-obligation. Japanese civil law about it is compared to Korean that in this paper. In Korea, joint lessees bear the responsibility 'jointly' by civil code §654. But in Japan, their responsibility is treated case by case theoretically. The divided obligation is a fundamental rule in co-obligation. But It can be the indivisible obligation, joint obligation and ungenuine joint obligation case by case. They are different one after another delicately. That is, in japan, civil legislator tried to pursue a flexibility in concerned of 'joint lessees.'We have to give attention to that the division in them is being collapsed. Indivisible obligation and joint obligation is treated samely in reality. And we cannot discover easily bases that separate joint obligation from ungenuine joint obligation. I wish you could understand it easily and clearly by this paper.
참고문헌 (57)
- 강봉수, "주석민법〔채권총칙(2)〕" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2003), 박영사
- 김상용, "채권각론" (2003), 법문사
- 김석우, "채권법총론" (1972), 박영사
- 김종화, "공동상속인의 소유권이전등기의무의 승계", 민법판례연구, 5 (1983), 경문사
- 문흥안, "주석민법〔채권총칙(2)〕" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 이은영, "채권각론" (2004), 박영사
- 장경학, "채권총론" (1992), 교육과학사
- 제철웅, "‘수인의 채무자 있는 채권관계’의 이해에 대한 비판적 검토", 비교사법, 15(1), pp.1~51 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
- 최병조, "로마법강의" (2007), 박영사
- 허만, "민법주해(Ⅹ)" (1999), 박영사
- 加藤一郞, "不法行爲" (1961), 有斐閣
- 高橋 眞, "不眞正連帶債務槪念の有用性", ジュリスト (1979), 民法の爭點
- 谷口知平, "民法III(法學綱要·下)" (1953), 有斐閣
- 戒能通孝, "債務各論" (1957), 弘文堂
- 鳩山秀夫, "日本債權法(總論)" (1928), 岩波書店
- 鳩山秀夫, "日本債權法(各論)" (1928), 岩波書店
- 近藤英吉, "相續法" (1942), 日本評論社
- 近藤英吉, "註釋日本民法(債權編總則·中)" (1936), 嚴松堂書店
- 大森忠夫, "保險法" (1958), 靑林書院
- 來栖建助, "共同相續財産について", 法學協會雜紙, 56(6), pp.6~ (1938), 法學協會
- 末川 博, "民法硏究(2卷)" (1941), 弘文堂
- 末川 博, "債權各論" (1941), 岩波書店
- 末川 博, "不眞正連帶債務に關する疑問", 民法に於ける特殊問題硏究, 2 (1986), 有斐閣
- 末弘嚴太浪, "判例民法" (1922), 日本評論社
- 山中康雄, "債權法總則講義" (1972), 有斐閣
- 山中康雄, "連帶債務の本質(石田還曆)" (1978), 有斐閣
- 石田文次郞, "債權各論" (1956), 早陷田大學出版部
- 石板音四郞, "日本民法(債務 第3卷)" (1914), 有斐閣書房
- 松坂佐一, "民法提要(債權總論)" (1958), 有斐閣
- 松坂佐一, "債權者代位權の硏究" (1970), 有悲閣
- 勝本正晃, "債權總論(中1)" (1956), 有斐閣
- 勝本正晃, "債權法槪論(總論)" (1957), 有斐閣
- 勝本正晃, "債權法槪論(中)" (1958), 有斐閣
- 我妻榮, "物權法" (1956), 岩波書店
- 我妻榮, "債權總論" (1975), 岩波書店
- 我妻榮, "債權各論" (1956), 岩波書店
- 我妻榮, "事務管理·不當利得·不法行爲" (1989), 日本評論社
- 我妻榮, "債權法(註釋)" (1951), 日本評論社
- 我妻榮, "親族法相續法(註釋)" (1956), 日本評論新社
- 於保不二雄, "註釋民法(總則4)" (1979), 有斐閣
- 吾妻光俊, "債權法" (1958), 弘文堂
- 有川勝二, "親族法相續法" (1925), 淸水書店
- 林良平, "物權法" (1956), 有斐閣
- 川島武宣, "契約不履行と不法行爲との關係について. in: 民法解釋學の各問題" (1958), 弘文堂
- 川島一郞, "民法(三)" (1953), 有斐閣
- 川島一郞, "債權法總則講義(第一)" (1953), 有斐閣
- 川島.一郞, "判例民事法" (1937), 有斐閣
- 柚木馨, "判例債權法總論(下)" (1952), 有斐閣
- 柚木馨, "判例相續法論" (1956), 有斐閣
- 椿壽夫, "多數當事者の債權關契" (2006), 信山社
- 椿壽夫, "共同不法行爲", 民商法雜紙, 36(1) (1932), 有斐閣
- 椿壽夫, "連帶債務論の若干の問題點", 民商法雜紙, 34(3) (1930), 有斐閣
- 穗積重遠, "判例民事法" (1930), 有斐閣
- "Barde-Baudry-Lacantinerie: Tr. De d. c. Obl. II, p.463", ~
- "Enneccerus-Lehmann, Schuldr, S. 366", ~
- "Larenz, Lehrbuch des Schldrechts 1.Bd. 12.Aufl. S. 512: 58. 216;", ~