본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

An Analysis of Korean Generic Interpretations

2

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Semantic research on generics has centered on the existence of a determiner in a generic NP because generics are mostly presented in bare plurals in English and in definite NPs in Romance languages. Hence, generic sentences in languages without determiners require special treatment. This study reviews previous theoretical analyses of generic interpretations in determiner-less languages and proposes that countability in Korean is determined by humanness. Given the distinction between count and mass nouns, generic interpretations in Korean reveal patterns similar to those found in English.

Abstract

Semantic research on generics has centered on the existence of a determiner in a generic NP because generics are mostly presented in bare plurals in English and in definite NPs in Romance languages. Hence, generic sentences in languages without determiners require special treatment. This study reviews previous theoretical analyses of generic interpretations in determiner-less languages and proposes that countability in Korean is determined by humanness. Given the distinction between count and mass nouns, generic interpretations in Korean reveal patterns similar to those found in English.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Beck, S., "Cumulation Is Needed: A Reply to Winter (2000)", Natural Language Semantics, 8, pp.349~371 (2000)
  2. Brisson, C., "Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.129~184 (2003)
  3. Burton-Roberts, N., "Generic Sentences and Analyticity", Studies in Language, 1, pp.155~196 (1977)
  4. Carlson, G., "Reference to Kinds in English", 박사, pp.1977
  5. Carlson, G., "The Semantic Contribution of English Generic Sentences in: Properties, Types and Meaning" (1989), Kluwer
  6. Chierchia, G., "Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of Semantic Parameter in: Events and Grammar" (1998), Kluwer
  7. Chierchia, G., "Reference to Kinds across Languages", Natural Language and Semantics, 6, pp.339~405 (1998)
  8. Cohen, A., "On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars", Journal of Semantics, 18, pp.183~209 (2001)
  9. Corbett, G., "Number" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  10. Dayal, V., "Number Marking and (In)definiteness in Kind Terms", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.393~450 (2004)
  11. Diesing, M., "Indefiniteness" (1992), MIT Press
  12. Gerstner, C., "Genericity in: Handbuch der Syntax" (1993), Gruyter
  13. Kratzer, A., "Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates in: The Generic Book" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  14. Nemoto, N., "On Mass Denotations of Bare Nouns in Japanese and Korean", Linguistics, 43, pp.383~413 (2005)
  15. Wilkinson, K., "Studies in the Semantics of Generic NP’s", 박사, pp.1991
  16. Winter, Y., "Distributivity and Dependency", Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, pp.27~69 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)