본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of neonatal outcomes and intrapartum events in full term vaginal deliveries conducted by staff versus resident physicians

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the neonatal outcomes and intrapartum events conducted by staff versus resident physicians in full term vaginal deliveries. Methods We divided study population (n = 5,007) into two groups: staff versus resident physicians. These two groups were sub-divided; faculty versus fellow and senior versus junior resident, respectively. The maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes including Apgar score, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and umbilical arterial pH and intrapartum event which was defined as the occurrence of shoulder dystocia and vacuum delivery were also investigated. Results There was no difference in neonatal outcomes between two groups. The group delivered by staff had a higher rate of nulliparity, large for gestational age and intrapartum events than the resident physician group. The subgroup analysis revealed a higher rate of vacuum delivery in the group delivered by faculty and senior members than the group delivered by fellows and junior members. Conclusion There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the two groups; staff versus resident physicians in full term vaginal deliveries in low-risk pregnant women. Also, experienced obstetricians might tend to participate in difficult labors and would prefer applying vacuum compared to the obstetricians with fewer experiences.

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the neonatal outcomes and intrapartum events conducted by staff versus resident physicians in full term vaginal deliveries. Methods We divided study population (n = 5,007) into two groups: staff versus resident physicians. These two groups were sub-divided; faculty versus fellow and senior versus junior resident, respectively. The maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes including Apgar score, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and umbilical arterial pH and intrapartum event which was defined as the occurrence of shoulder dystocia and vacuum delivery were also investigated. Results There was no difference in neonatal outcomes between two groups. The group delivered by staff had a higher rate of nulliparity, large for gestational age and intrapartum events than the resident physician group. The subgroup analysis revealed a higher rate of vacuum delivery in the group delivered by faculty and senior members than the group delivered by fellows and junior members. Conclusion There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the two groups; staff versus resident physicians in full term vaginal deliveries in low-risk pregnant women. Also, experienced obstetricians might tend to participate in difficult labors and would prefer applying vacuum compared to the obstetricians with fewer experiences.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. Jae Won Lim, "The changing trends in live birth statistics in Korea, 1970 to 2010", Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 54(11), pp.429~435 (2011), 대한소아과학회
  2. Abenhaim HA, "Obstetrician or family physician: are vaginal deliveries managed differently?", J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 29, pp.801~805 (2007)
  3. Suzuki S, "The attitude of ‘low risk’ pregnant women in Japan toward midwife-led care during pregnancy and labor", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25, pp.2141~2142 (2012)
  4. Janakiraman V, "Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in U.S. hospitals", Obstet Gynecol, 118, pp.521~527 (2011)
  5. Garcia FA, "Effect of academic affiliation and obstetric volume on clinical outcome and cost of childbirth", Obstet Gynecol, 97, pp.567~576 (2001)
  6. Mayfield JA, "The relation of obstetrical volume and nursery level to perinatal mortality", Am J Public Health, 80, pp.819~823 (1990)
  7. Bernitz S, "Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial", BJOG, 118, pp.1357~1364 (2011)
  8. Chauhan SP, "Shoulder dystocia: comparison of the ACOG practice bulletin with another national guideline", Am J Perinatol, 27, pp.129~136 (2010)
  9. Scheid D, "Do we practice what we preach? Comparing the patients of faculty and residents", Fam Med, 27, pp.519~524 (1995)
  10. Zallman L, "Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians", J Gen Intern Med, 25, pp.1193~1197 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

Risk of cesarean section after induced versus spontaneous labor at term gestation김미나, 김종화, 노정래, 오수영, 유지연, 이혜란, 최석주대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2015 · 제58권 제5호Maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor around termEui Hyeok Kim, Hanna Moon, Ji Hyun Lee대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2023 · 제66권 제1호Outcomes of ‘one-day trial of vaginal delivery of twins’ at 36–37 weeks’ gestation in JapanShunji Suzuki, Yuria Haruna대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2019 · 제62권 제6호Obstetric outcome of induction of labor using prostaglandin gel in patients with previous one cesarean sectionMukesh Sangwan, Pinki Lakra, Rajiv Mahendru, Sanjeet Singh, Sunita Siwach, Vijayata Sangwan대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2019 · 제62권 제6호Delayed diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcomes in women with large for gestational age fetuses during the third trimester김병재, 김선민, 김소희, 김태훈, 손지나, 이택상, 임현지, 전혜원, 황규리대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제5호단일 기관에서의 질식분만과 제왕분만의 장단점에 대한 분석김의혁, 노영호, 류지원, 하현용, 한상원대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2011 · 제54권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)