Evaluation of risk factors of vaginal cuff dehiscence after hysterectomy
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of vaginal cuff dehiscence or evisceration according to the type of operation. MethodsMedical records of 604 women who underwent hysterectomies at Korea University Anam Hospital between June 2007 and June 2011 were reviewed. They were allocated to six groups. The six types of hysterectomies included robotic hysterectomy (n = 7), robotic radical hysterectomy and node dissection (RRHND, n = 9), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, n = 274), laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, n = 238), laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and node dissection (n = 11), and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH, n = 63). The characteristics and outcomes of each groups were compared. ResultsThere was no difference in the characteristics of patients between 6 groups. In total of 604 hysterectomies, 3 evisceration (0.49%) and 21 dehiscences (3.47%) occurred. Evisceration were found in RRHND (1/9, 11.1%), TLH (1/276, 0.36%), and ARH (1/63, 1.56%). Dehiscences occurred in TLH (15/274, 5.42%), LAVH (4/238, 1.68%), and ARH (2/63, 3.17%). In 169 cases of TLH with intra-corporeal continuous suture, 1 evisceration and 4 dehiscences occurred, whereas 11 dehiscences occurred in 105 TLH cases with vaginal continuous locking suture (2.96% vs. 10.47%, P = 0.02). ConclusionThe incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscenceand eviscerationwas significantly higher in TLH than LAVH. The intra-corporeal cuff suture was superior to the vaginal suture to prevent the vaginal cuff complications in TLH.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of vaginal cuff dehiscence or evisceration according to the type of operation. MethodsMedical records of 604 women who underwent hysterectomies at Korea University Anam Hospital between June 2007 and June 2011 were reviewed. They were allocated to six groups. The six types of hysterectomies included robotic hysterectomy (n = 7), robotic radical hysterectomy and node dissection (RRHND, n = 9), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, n = 274), laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, n = 238), laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and node dissection (n = 11), and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH, n = 63). The characteristics and outcomes of each groups were compared. ResultsThere was no difference in the characteristics of patients between 6 groups. In total of 604 hysterectomies, 3 evisceration (0.49%) and 21 dehiscences (3.47%) occurred. Evisceration were found in RRHND (1/9, 11.1%), TLH (1/276, 0.36%), and ARH (1/63, 1.56%). Dehiscences occurred in TLH (15/274, 5.42%), LAVH (4/238, 1.68%), and ARH (2/63, 3.17%). In 169 cases of TLH with intra-corporeal continuous suture, 1 evisceration and 4 dehiscences occurred, whereas 11 dehiscences occurred in 105 TLH cases with vaginal continuous locking suture (2.96% vs. 10.47%, P = 0.02). ConclusionThe incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscenceand eviscerationwas significantly higher in TLH than LAVH. The intra-corporeal cuff suture was superior to the vaginal suture to prevent the vaginal cuff complications in TLH.
참고문헌 (17)
- Ramirez PT, "Vaginal evisceration after hysterectomy:a literature review", Obstet Gynecol Surv, 57, pp.462~467 (2002)
- Kho RM, "Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures", Obstet Gynecol, 114(2 Pt 1), pp.231~235 (2009)
- Ceccaroni M, "Vaginal cuff dehiscence after hysterectomy: a multicenter retrospective study", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 158, pp.308~313 (2011)
- Hur HC, "Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy", Obstet Gynecol, 118, pp.794~801 (2011)
- Hur HC, "Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 14, pp.311~317 (2007)
- Iaco PD, "Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: is vaginal cuff closure associated with a reduced risk?", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 125, pp.134~138 (2006)
- Kho RM, "Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 197, pp.113.e1~113.e4 (2007)
- Uccella S, "Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 205, pp.119.e1~119.e12 (2011)
- Nick AM, "Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy", Gynecol Oncol, 120, pp.47~51 (2011)
- Jeung IC, "A prospective comparison of vaginal stump suturing techniques during total laparoscopic hysterectomy", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 282, pp.631~638 (2010)
- Reich H, "Laparoscopic hysterectomy in current gynecological practice", Rev Gynaecol Pract, 3, pp.32~40 (2003)
- DeNardis SA, "Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 111, pp.412~417 (2008)
- Croak AJ, "Characteristics of patients with vaginal rupture and evisceration", Obstet Gynecol, 103, pp.572~576 (2004)
- Hwang JH, "Vaginal cuff closure:a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 71, pp.163~169 (2011)
- Somkuti SG, "Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy in premenopausal women: a presentation of three cases", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 171, pp.567~568 (1994)
- Kowalski LD, "Vaginal evisceration: presentation and management in postmenopausal women", J Am Coll Surg, 183, pp.225~229 (1996)
- Alessandri F, "Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 17, pp.725~729 (2010)