Spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage: A comparison of cytogenetic diagnosis in 250 cases
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of cytogenetically abnormal miscarriages in couples with spontaneous abortions (SA) or recurrent miscarriages (RM). MethodsKaryotyping of specimens from 164 abortuses with SA and 86 abortuses with RM was successfully performed according to the standard cytogenetic methods using G-banding technique. ResultsAmong the total 164 cases of SA group, 81 (49.4%) were euploid and the rest (83, 50.6%) showed chromosomal abnormalities. In RM(≥2) and RM(≥3) group, 31 (36.0%)/27 (34.6%) cases were euploid and 55 (64.0%)/51(65.4%) cases were abnormal, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in the rate of cytogenetic abnormality between SA and RM groups (P<0.05). In all groups, women with advanced maternal age (≥35 years) had a higher rate of chromosome anomalies compared with women younger than age 35 (normal:abnormal = 32.4%:67.6% for ≥35 years and 53.8%:46.2% for <35 years in SA; 19.2%:80.8%/21.7%:78.3% for ≥35 years and 43.3%:56.7%/40.0%:60.0% for <35 years in RM(≥2) and RM(≥3), respectively; P<0.05). In SA group, an increase of normal karyotypes was noted with increased gestational age (<10 week, 38.0%; 10–15 week, 53.5%; 16–20 week, 65.7%). In RM group, most of cases were in <10 week and the frequency of trisomies with chromosomes 1 to 10 were increased compared with that of SA. ConclusionThere was a statistically significant difference in the frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities between SA and RM groups. Our results will provide useful information for diagnosis and genetic counseling of patients with SA or RM .
Abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of cytogenetically abnormal miscarriages in couples with spontaneous abortions (SA) or recurrent miscarriages (RM). MethodsKaryotyping of specimens from 164 abortuses with SA and 86 abortuses with RM was successfully performed according to the standard cytogenetic methods using G-banding technique. ResultsAmong the total 164 cases of SA group, 81 (49.4%) were euploid and the rest (83, 50.6%) showed chromosomal abnormalities. In RM(≥2) and RM(≥3) group, 31 (36.0%)/27 (34.6%) cases were euploid and 55 (64.0%)/51(65.4%) cases were abnormal, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in the rate of cytogenetic abnormality between SA and RM groups (P<0.05). In all groups, women with advanced maternal age (≥35 years) had a higher rate of chromosome anomalies compared with women younger than age 35 (normal:abnormal = 32.4%:67.6% for ≥35 years and 53.8%:46.2% for <35 years in SA; 19.2%:80.8%/21.7%:78.3% for ≥35 years and 43.3%:56.7%/40.0%:60.0% for <35 years in RM(≥2) and RM(≥3), respectively; P<0.05). In SA group, an increase of normal karyotypes was noted with increased gestational age (<10 week, 38.0%; 10–15 week, 53.5%; 16–20 week, 65.7%). In RM group, most of cases were in <10 week and the frequency of trisomies with chromosomes 1 to 10 were increased compared with that of SA. ConclusionThere was a statistically significant difference in the frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities between SA and RM groups. Our results will provide useful information for diagnosis and genetic counseling of patients with SA or RM .
참고문헌 (31)
- Speroff L, "Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility" (1999), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Zinaman MJ, "Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss", Fertil Steril, 65, pp.503~509 (1996)
- Rai R, "Recurrent miscarriage", Lancet, 368, pp.601~611 (2006)
- Stephenson M, "Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss", Clin Obstet Gynecol, 50, pp.132~145 (2007)
- Hassold TJ, "A cytogenetic study of repeated spontaneous abortions", Am J Hum Genet, 32, pp.723~730 (1980)
- Stirrat GM, "Recurrent miscarriage", Lancet, 336, pp.673~675 (1990)
- Hogge WA, "The clinical use of karyotyping spontaneous abortions", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, pp.397~400 (2003)
- Stephenson MD, "Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study", Hum Reprod, 17, pp.446~451 (2002)
- Kalousek DK, "Early spontaneous abortion: morphologic and karyotypic findings in 3,912 cases", Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 29, pp.53~61 (1993)
- Fritz B, "Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions", Eur J Hum Genet, 9, pp.539~547 (2001)
- Abdalla HI, "Age, pregnancy and miscarriage: uterine versus ovarian factors", Hum Reprod, 8, pp.1512~1517 (1993)
- Munne S, "Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities", Fertil Steril, 64, pp.382~391 (1995)
- Nybo Andersen AM, "Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study", BMJ, 320, pp.1708~1712 (2000)
- Poland BJ, "Reproductive counseling in patients who have had a spontaneous abortion", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 127, pp.685~691 (1977)
- Regan L, "Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion", BMJ, 299, pp.541~545 (1989)
- Rubio C, "Embryo aneuploidy screening for unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a minireview", Am J Reprod Immunol, 53, pp.159~165 (2005)
- Carp H, "Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage", Fertil Steril, 75, pp.678~682 (2001)
- Ogasawara M, "Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages", Fertil Steril, 73, pp.300~304 (2000)
- Stern JJ, "Frequency of abnormal karyotypes among abortuses from women with and without a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion", Fertil Steril, 65, pp.250~253 (1996)
- Sullivan AE, "Recurrent fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage", Obstet Gynecol, 104, pp.784~788 (2004)
- Li TC, "Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis", Hum Reprod Update, 8, pp.463~481 (2002)
- Ohno M, "A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi", Obstet Gynecol, 77, pp.394~398 (1991)
- Simpson JL, "Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses:relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis", Am J Med Genet, 35, pp.165~173 (1990)
- Nicolaidis P, "Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies", Hum Reprod, 13, pp.313~319 (1998)
- Bajnoczky K, "“Premature anaphase” in a couple with recurrent miscarriages", Hum Genet, 92, pp.388~390 (1993)
- Simpson JL, "Causes of fetal wastage", Clin Obstet Gynecol, 50, pp.10~30 (2007)
- Bui TH, "Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era?", Prenat Diagn, 31, pp.235~243 (2011)
- Carp H, "Embryonic karyotype in recurrent miscarriage with parental karyotypic aberrations", Fertil Steril, 85, pp.446~450 (2006)
- Stephenson MD, "Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement", Hum Reprod, 21, pp.1076~1082 (2006)
- Clifford K, "An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage:preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases", Hum Reprod, 9, pp.1328~1332 (1994)
- Franssen MT, "Selective chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages:case-control study", BMJ, 331, pp.137~141 (2005)