본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.

Abstract

Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Shields SG, "Dystocia in nulliparous women", Am Fam Physician, 75, pp.1671~1678 (2007)
  2. Silver RM, "Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries", Obstet Gynecol, 107, pp.1226~1232 (2006)
  3. Cheng YW, "How long is too long : does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 191, pp.933~938 (2004)
  4. Fasubaa OB, "Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour : a randomised comparative study of two methods", J Obstet Gynaecol, 22, pp.375~378 (2002)
  5. Spencer C, "Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour", BMJ, 333, pp.613~614 (2006)
  6. Alexander JM, "Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor", Obstet Gynecol, 109, pp.917~921 (2007)
  7. Henry DE, "Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor", Obstet Gynecol, 112, pp.1109~1115 (2008)
  8. Ghi T, "ISUOG practice guidelines : intrapartum ultrasound", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 52, pp.128~139 (2018)
  9. Buchmann E, "Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 101, pp.285~289 (2008)
  10. Rozenberg P, "Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, pp.332~337 (2008)
  11. Gluck O, "The correlation between the number of vaginal examinations during active labor and febrile morbidity, a retrospective cohort study", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 20, pp.246~ (2020)
  12. Wiafe YA, "Acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound by mothers in an African population", J Ultrasound, 23, pp.55~59 (2020)
  13. Rizzo G, "Women’s compliance with ultrasound in labor : a prospective observational study", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 34, pp.1454~1458 (2021)
  14. Gilboa Y, "Intrapartum ultrasound for the management of the active pushing phase", Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 3(6S), pp.100422~ (2021)
  15. Chan WWY, "Pre-induction transperineal ultrasound assessment for the prediction of labor outcome", Fetal Diagn Ther, 45, pp.256~267 (2019)
  16. Kamel R, "Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 34, pp.3175~3180 (2021)
  17. Frick A, "Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 55, pp.391~400 (2020)
  18. Rizzo G, "Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women : a prospective cohort study", Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2, pp.100193~ (2020)
  19. Rizzo G, "Prediction of delivery after 40weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton multiparous women : a prospective cohort study", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 35, pp.7787~7793 (2022)
  20. Minajagi PS, "Predicting the mode of delivery by angle of progression(AOP)before the onset of labor by transperineal ultrasound in nulliparous women", Curr Women’s Health Rev, 16, pp.39~45 (2020)
  21. Cohen WR, "Clinical evaluation of labor : an evidence-and experience-based approach", J Perinat Med, 49, pp.241~253 (2021)
  22. Tang H, "Process of fetal head descent as recorded by ultrasonography:how does this compare with the conventional first stage of labor?", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 156, pp.28~33 (2022)
  23. Chan YT, "Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and headperineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 28, pp.1476~1481 (2015)
  24. Torkildsen EA, "Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 37, pp.702~708 (2011)
  25. Eggebø TM, "Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor : a two-center study", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 43, pp.195~201 (2014)
  26. Solaiman SA, "Transperineal ultrasound of fetal head progression in prolonged labor : women’s acceptance and ability to predict the mode of delivery", Egyptian J Radiol Nucl Med, 51, pp.94~ (2020)
  27. Hjartardóttir H, "Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?", Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 3, pp.100383~ (2021)
  28. Dupuis O, "Fetal head position during the second stage of labor : comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 123, pp.193~197 (2005)
  29. Barbera AF, "A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, pp.313~319 (2009)
  30. Nassr AA, "Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 226, pp.205~214 (2022)
  31. Chan VYT, "Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 144, pp.192~198 (2019)
  32. Dall’Asta A, "Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor : the value of intrapartum ultrasound", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221, pp.642~ (2019)
  33. Katzir T, "Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 307, pp.763~770 (2023)
  34. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), "National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: guidelines. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies", NICE, ~ (2023)
  35. Rouse DJ, "Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women : relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 201, pp.357~ (2009)
  36. Kalache KD, "Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses : how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery?", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, pp.326~330 (2009)
  37. Nassr AA, "Angle of progression measured using transperineal ultrasound for prediction of uncomplicated operative vaginal delivery : systematic review and meta-analysis", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 60, pp.338~345 (2022)
  38. Carvalho Neto RH, "Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 34, pp.2340~2348 (2021)
  39. Chaemsaithong P, "Factors that affect ultrasounddetermined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 220, pp.592~ (2019)
  40. Marsoosi V, "Role of ‘angle of progression’ in prediction of delivery mode", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 41, pp.1693~1699 (2015)
  41. Nishimura K, "Objective diagnosis of arrested labor on transperineal ultrasound", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 42, pp.803~809 (2016)
  42. Bulut AN, "Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth", J Perinat Med, 49, pp.36~42 (2020)
  43. Priya SS, "Intra partum transperineal ultrasound to assess the progress of labour and to predict the mode of delivery-a hospital based study", Int J Med Res Health Sci, 10, pp.71~77 (2021)
  44. Vinod V, "Prediction of the mode of delivery using intrapartum translabial ultrasound in ateaching hospital in South India-a prospective observational study", Thai J Obstet Gynaecol, 30, pp.41~50 (2022)
  45. Nouri-Khasheh-Heiran E, "The success of vaginal birth by use of trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination and vaginal examination only in pregnant women with labor induction : a comparative study", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 23, pp.3~ (2023)
  46. Ingeberg H, "Intrapartum ultrasound to predict vaginal labor : a prospective cohort study", Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol, 6, pp.4778~4781 (2017)
  47. Chor CM, "Prediction of labor outcome using serial transperineal ultrasound in the first stage of labor", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 32, pp.31~37 (2019)
  48. Pérez SP, "Role of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound : angle of progression cut-off and correlation with delivery mode", Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med, 3, pp.1~4 (2017)
  49. Kandil RA, "Values and validity of fetal parameters by ultrasound and Doppler as markers of fetal lung maturity", Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med, 52, pp.1~10 (2021)
  50. Elkadi MA, "Role of 'angle of progression' in prediction of vaginal delivery in primiparous women", Gin Pol Med Project, 16, pp.1~7 (2021)
  51. Ibrahim GA, "The assessment of intrapartum transperineal ultrasonographic parameters for their effectiveness in evaluation of progress of labor and prediction of mode of delivery in Egyptian Women. Open Access Maced", J Med Sci, 9, pp.1037~1043 (2021)
  52. Ghi T, "Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent : relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 44, pp.82~89 (2014)
  53. Malik R, "Measurement of angle of descent(AOD)by transperineal ultrasound in labour to predict successful vaginal delivery", J Obstet Gynaecol India, 70, pp.126~132 (2020)
  54. Ciaciura-Jarno M, "Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery", Ginekol Pol, 87, pp.448~453 (2016)
  55. Yonetani N, "Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 49, pp.246~251 (2017)
  56. Barros JG, "Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery-a randomized controlled trial", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 100, pp.1075~1081 (2021)
  57. Brunelli E, "The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 225, pp.81~ (2021)
  58. Zarean E, "Angle of progression with trans-perineal ultrasound and delivery type in labor’s second stage; a cross-sectional study in Isfahan, Iran", J Prev Epidemiol, 7, pp.e05~ (2021)
  59. Ghi T, "Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 41, pp.430~435 (2013)
  60. Antonio Sainz J, "Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in nonocciput posterior position", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 29, pp.3400~3405 (2016)
  61. Sainz JA, "Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 29, pp.1348~1352 (2016)
  62. Bultez T, "Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 48, pp.86~91 (2016)
  63. Sainz JA, "Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative(vacuum and forceps)deliveries in nulliparous women", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 96, pp.1490~1497 (2017)
  64. Hadad S, "Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery", Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 3, pp.100249~ (2021)
  65. Cuerva MJ, "Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 43, pp.687~692 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery A novel treatment for gynecologic tumors안기훈, 오민정대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2014 · 제57권 제06호Elastographic measurement of the cervix during pregnancy: Current status and future challenges김현정, 황한성대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2017 · 제60권 제1호Three-dimensional volumetric gray-scale uterine cervix histogram prediction of days to delivery in full term pregnancy김수관, 김지연, 김해중, 문성용, 오민정, 오지수, 전혜진, 조금준, 한명희, 홍순철대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2013 · 제56권 제05호Predicting factors for success of vaginal delivery in preterm induction with prostaglandin E2김유민, 김종화, 노정래, 박주영, 성지희, 오수영, 최석주대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2017 · 제60권 제2호자기공명 영상을 이용한 여성 골반계측과 아두골반 불균형으로 인한 제왕절개분만의 연관성윤진, 나은덕, 문지현, 백민정, 이새미, 이지연, 이한나, 장지현, 정상희한국모자보건학회 · 한국모자보건학회지2022 · 제26권 제4호Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version김문영, 김민형, 김여래, 류현미, 손인숙, 이준이, 정진훈, 주성홍, 한유정, 한정열대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)