본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years.Methods We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type.Results Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar results were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts.Conclusion Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

Abstract

Objective Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years. Methods We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type. Results Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar results were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts. Conclusion Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. De Marzi P, "Surgical treatment of elderly patients with endometrial cancer(≥ 65 years)", J Geriatr Oncol, 4, pp.368~373 (2013)
  2. Turrentine FE, "Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients", J Am Coll Surg, 203, pp.865~877 (2006)
  3. Hamel MB, "Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older : morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery", J Am Geriatr Soc, 53, pp.424~429 (2005)
  4. Caglià P, "Physiopathology and clinical considerations of laparoscopic surgery in the elderly", Int J Surg, 33(Suppl 1), pp.S97~S102 (2016)
  5. Sultana CJ, "Morbidity and mortality of incontinence surgery in elderly women : an analysis of Medicare data", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 176, pp.344~348 (1997)
  6. Walker JL, "Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer : Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2", J Clin Oncol, 27, pp.5331~5336 (2009)
  7. Kolarsick PA, "Minimizing the impact of colorectal surgery in the older patient : the role of minimally invasive surgery in the geriatric population", Eur J Surg Oncol, 46, pp.333~337 (2020)
  8. Weber DM, "Laparoscopic surgery : an excellent approach in elderly patients", Arch Surg, 138, pp.1083~1088 (2003)
  9. Myre K, "Simultaneous hemodynamic and echocardiographic changes during abdominal gas insufflation", Surg Laparosc Endosc, 7, pp.415~419 (1997)
  10. O’Malley C, "Physiologic changes during laparoscopy", Anesthesiol Clin North Am, 19, pp.1~19 (2001)
  11. Law WL, "Laparoscopic colorectal resection : a safe option for elderly patients", J Am Coll Surg, 195, pp.768~773 (2002)
  12. Frasson M, "Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients", Dis Colon Rectum, 51, pp.296~300 (2008)
  13. Ciavattini A, "Gynecologic laparoscopy in patients aged 65 or more : feasibility and safety in the presence of increased comorbidity", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 175, pp.49~53 (2014)
  14. Buchweitz O, "Laparoscopy in patients over 60 years old : a prospective, randomized evaluation of laparoscopic versus open adnexectomy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, pp.1364~1368 (2005)
  15. Suh DH, "Management of the elderly patient with gynecologic cancer : report of the 2011 workshop in geriatric gynecologic oncology", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 22, pp.161~169 (2012)
  16. Hannan EL, "Predictors of readmission for complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery", JAMA, 290, pp.773~780 (2003)
  17. Bentrem DJ, "Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery", Arch Surg, 144, pp.1013~1020 (2009)
  18. Massarweh NN, "Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes", Arch Surg, 144, pp.1108~1114 (2009)
  19. Guy MS, "Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, pp.350~ (2016)
  20. Windberger U, "Hemodynamic effects of prolonged abdominal insufflation for laparoscopic procedures", Gastrointest Endosc, 41, pp.121~129 (1995)
  21. Jakimowicz J, "Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow", Surg Endosc, 12, pp.129~132 (1998)
  22. Ball A, "Choosing the right patient : planning for laparotomy or laparoscopy in the patient with endometrial cancer", J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 33, pp.468~474 (2011)
  23. Ramirez PT, "Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer", N Engl J Med, 379, pp.1895~1904 (2018)
  24. Bishop EA, "Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy : a NRG", Gynecologic Oncology Group study, 2018, pp.218, 109~
  25. Krause AK, "Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and perioperative morbidity in elderly women", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 23, pp.949~953 (2016)
  26. Madden N, "Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 220, pp.253~ (2019)
  27. Oresanya LB, "Preoperative assessment of the older patient : a narrative review", JAMA, 311, pp.2110~2120 (2014)
  28. Delvecchio A, "Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients : a propensity score matching analysis", HPB(Oxford), 24, pp.933~941 (2022)
  29. Manceau G, "Multicenter phase III randomized trial comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for colon cancer surgery in patients older than 75 years : the CELL study, a Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie(FRENCH)trial", BMC Cancer, 19, pp.1185~ (2019)
  30. Lee SB, "Differences in youngest-old, middle-old, and oldest-old patients who visit the emergency department", Clin Exp Emerg Med, 5, pp.249~255 (2018)
  31. Uccella S, "Laparoscopic vs. open treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly and very elderly : an age-stratified multicenter study on 1606 women", Gynecol Oncol, 141, pp.211~217 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Influence of previous abdominal surgery on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy서은석, 이승호, 임소이, 전승주, 정선영, 조윤진대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2018 · 제61권 제3호Clinical outcomes of hysterectomy for benign diseases in the female genital tract: 6 years’ experience in a single institute구유진, 이대형, Hyo-Shin Kim영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2020 · 제37권 제4호Laparoscopic gynecological surgery in COVID-19 pandemicArchana Kumari, Deepali Garg, Kallol Kumar Roy, Nilofar Noor, Rakhi Rai, Rinchen Zangmo대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2021 · 제64권 제3호Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus김상운, 김성훈, 김영태, 남은지, 이진화, 황선미대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2015 · 제58권 제3호Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era김경주, 김기동, 김재원, 김진희, 박서진, 이정윤, 임명철대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제2호Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future김미란, Gen Yuki, Jae-Yen Song, Jisu Mun, JungYoon Park, SeongEun Bak, Su Jeong Lee, Youn-Jee Chung대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2023 · 제66권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)