본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse

이규성|고광진
대한배뇨장애요실금학회 (Korean Continence Society)|2020.06|International Neurourology Journal|제24권 제2호|pp. 97-110|DOI 10.5213/inj.2040056.028

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

RoboticsPelvic organ prolapseSacrocolpopexy

초록

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold-standard treatment for apical compartment prolapse, as it is more effective and durable than the transvaginal approach. In the current era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques have been described, but have not gained popularity due to their complexity and steep learning curves. To overcome this problem, robotic sacrocolpopexy was introduced, and has shown equivalent outcomes and safety compared to open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy based on findings that have been accumulated over 15 years.

Abstract

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold-standard treatment for apical compartment prolapse, as it is more effective and durable than the transvaginal approach. In the current era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques have been described, but have not gained popularity due to their complexity and steep learning curves. To overcome this problem, robotic sacrocolpopexy was introduced, and has shown equivalent outcomes and safety compared to open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy based on findings that have been accumulated over 15 years.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Wu JM, "Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery", Obstetrics and gynecology, 123, pp.1201~1206 (2014)
  2. Wu JM, "Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003", Obstetrics and gynecology, 110, pp.1091~1095 (2007)
  3. Junyan Wang, "Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study", International Neurourology Journal, 23(2), pp.144~150 (2019), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회[DOI]
  4. Ganatra AM, "The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy : a review", Eur Urol, 55, pp.1089~1103 (2009)
  5. Di Marco DS, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse", Urology, 63, pp.373~376 (2004)
  6. Linder BJ, "Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using only absorbable suture for mesh fixation", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 23, pp.13~16 (2017)
  7. Tan-Kim J, "A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J, 26, pp.649~656 (2015)
  8. Serati M, "Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse : a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies", Eur Urol, 66, pp.303~318 (2014)
  9. Anger JT, "Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 123, pp.5~12 (2014)
  10. Barboglio PG, "Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse : a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 20, pp.38~43 (2014)
  11. Culligan PJ, "Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh", Int Urogynecol J, 25, pp.731~735 (2014)
  12. Kenton K, "One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 22, pp.382~384 (2016)
  13. Paraiso MF, "Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse : a randomized controlled trial", Obstet Gynecol, 118, pp.1005~1013 (2011)
  14. Salamon CG, "Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy", Int Urogynecol J, 24, pp.1371~1375 (2013)
  15. Tan-Kim J, "Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes", Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 17, pp.44~49 (2011)
  16. Elliott DS, "Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse", The Journal of urology, 176, pp.655~659 (2006)
  17. Illiano E, "Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for high-stage pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective, randomized, single-center study", Urology, 134, pp.116~123 (2019)
  18. Louis-Sylvestre C, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse", Int Urogynecol J, 24, pp.731~733 (2013)
  19. Seror J, "Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy", World J Urol, 30, pp.393~398 (2012)
  20. Siddiqui NY, "Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 206, pp.435.e1~435.e5 (2012)
  21. van Zanten F, "Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse : a bi-centre prospective cohort study", Bjog, 126, pp.1065~1073 (2019)
  22. Xylinas E, "Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy : initial experience in a high-volume laparoscopic reference center", Journal of endourology, 24, pp.1985~1989 (2010)
  23. Jong K, "Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy", J Robot Surg, 12, pp.455~460 (2018)
  24. Shimko MS, "Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a minimum of three years follow-up", J Robot Surg, 5, pp.175~180 (2011)
  25. Benson AD, "Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse", JSLS, 14, pp.525~530 (2010)
  26. Moreno Sierra J, "Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse : prospective analysis", Urol Int, 86, pp.414~418 (2011)
  27. 성현환, "Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse", International Neurourology Journal, 21(1), pp.68~74 (2017), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회
  28. Belsante M, "Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy", Can J Urol, 20, pp.6656~6661 (2013)
  29. 고광진, "Current surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: Strategies for the improvement of surgical outcomes", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 60(6), pp.413~424 (2019), 대한비뇨의학회[DOI]
  30. Nygaard I, "Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse", JAMA, 309, pp.2016~2024 (2013)
  31. Yohannes P, "Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills : is there a difference in the learning curve", Urology, 60, pp.39~45 (2002)
  32. Chandra V, "A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices", Surgery, 147, pp.830~839 (2010)
  33. Lucot JP, "Safety of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy for cystocele repair : results of the prosthetic pelvic floor repair randomized controlled trial", Eur Urol, 74, pp.167~176 (2018)
  34. Unger CA, "Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 211, pp.547.e1~547.e8 (2014)
  35. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh:Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, ~ (2011)
  36. Earle DB, "Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair:how do I choose?", Surg Clin North Am, 88, pp.179~201 (2008)
  37. Moore RD, "Comparison of vaginal mesh extrusion rates between a lightweight type I polypropylene mesh versus heavier mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse", Int Urogynecol J, 23, pp.1379~1386 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

Robotic sacrocolpopexyAl-Otaibi Mozon, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2024 · 제67권 제2호Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse among Peri- and Post-Menopausal Women김성훈, 채희동, Eun Sil Lee, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2020 · 제26권 제3호Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexyJung-Ho Shin, Sumin Oh대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2023 · 제66권 제6호Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse고광진, 서윤석, 성현환, 유규하, 이규성대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2017 · 제21권 제1호Robotic Single-Site® Sacrocolpopexy: First Report and Technique Using the Single-Site® Wristed Needle Driver이사라연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제4호How and on whom to perform uterine-preserving surgery for uterine prolapse전명재, Sumin Oh대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2022 · 제65권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

Stem Cell Therapy for Neurogenic Bladder After Spinal Cord Injury: Clinically Possible?김수진, 조영삼, 김계환, 박종목, 나영길pp. 3-10Dexmedetomidine Improves Locomotor Function and Alleviates Thermal Hyperalgesia Following Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury in Rats정준영, 한진희, 김동옥, 이봉재, 이재우, 장명수, 우길, 권재익pp. 11-18Combination Therapy With Polydeoxyribonucleotide and Pirfenidone Alleviates Symptoms of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Human Lung Epithelial A549 Cells고일규, 진준장, 황재준, 장복순, 백승숙, 김상훈, 전정원, 최천웅, 황락경pp. 56-64Letters Published in the June Issue문홍상pp. 95-96Management of Urinary Incontinence With Underactive Bladder: A Review조강준, 김준철pp. 111-117
원문 보기