The Risk of Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Rises in Parallel with an Increasing Number of High-Risk Findings at Baseline
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Colorectal adenomas that are ≥10 mm have villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, or that are associated with ≥3 adenomas are considered high-risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia according to the total number of high-risk findings detected on baseline colonoscopy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed in 862 patients who underwent removal of colorectal adenomas between 2005 and 2009. At least one surveillance colonoscopy had been conducted at Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Results: The cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3–4 high-risk findings at 1 year were 0.7%, 1.3%, 2.8%, and 8.0%; at 3 years, those were 5.9%, 11.9%, 15.5%, and 24.7%; and at 5 years, those were 8.5%, 18.7%, 26.3%, and 37.2%, respectively. In a multivariate model, the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was significantly higher for the multiple high-risk findings group when compared with the 0 high-risk findings group (1 high-risk (+): hazard ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.00–3.44]; 2 high-risk (+): 1.84 [0.88–3.84]; and 3–4 high-risk (+): 3.29 [1.54–7.01]; ptrend=0.020). Conclusions: The presence of overlapping multiple high-risk findings was associated with an increased risk of advanced neoplasia during surveillance.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Colorectal adenomas that are ≥10 mm have villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, or that are associated with ≥3 adenomas are considered high-risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia according to the total number of high-risk findings detected on baseline colonoscopy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed in 862 patients who underwent removal of colorectal adenomas between 2005 and 2009. At least one surveillance colonoscopy had been conducted at Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Results: The cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3–4 high-risk findings at 1 year were 0.7%, 1.3%, 2.8%, and 8.0%; at 3 years, those were 5.9%, 11.9%, 15.5%, and 24.7%; and at 5 years, those were 8.5%, 18.7%, 26.3%, and 37.2%, respectively. In a multivariate model, the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was significantly higher for the multiple high-risk findings group when compared with the 0 high-risk findings group (1 high-risk (+): hazard ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.00–3.44]; 2 high-risk (+): 1.84 [0.88–3.84]; and 3–4 high-risk (+): 3.29 [1.54–7.01]; ptrend=0.020). Conclusions: The presence of overlapping multiple high-risk findings was associated with an increased risk of advanced neoplasia during surveillance.
참고문헌 (30)
- Winawer SJ, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.1872~1885 (2006)
- Davila RE, "ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.546~557 (2006)
- Schmiegel W, "Colorectal carcinoma: the management of polyps, (neo)adjuvant therapy, and the treatment of metastases", Dtsch Arztebl Int, 106, pp.843~848 (2009)
- Bond JH, "Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology", Am J Gastroenterol, 95, pp.3053~3063 (2000)
- Arditi C, "Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II): screening for colorectal cancer", Endoscopy, 41, pp.200~208 (2009)
- 홍성노, "폴립절제 후 추적대장내시경검사 가이드라인", 대한소화기학회지, 59(2), pp.99~117 (2012), 대한소화기학회
- Martínez ME, "A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy", Gastroenterology, 136, pp.832~841 (2009)
- Saini SD, "Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.614~626 (2006)
- Yang G, "Pathologic features of initial adenomas as predictors for metachronous adenomas of the rectum", J Natl Cancer Inst, 90, pp.1661~1665 (1998)
- Yamaji Y, "Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese", Gut, 53, pp.568~572 (2004)
- Nusko G, "Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy", Gut, 51, pp.424~428 (2002)
- Noshirwani KC, "Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 51(4), pp.433~437 (2000)
- Bonithon-Kopp C, "Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence", Dis Colon Rectum, 47, pp.323~333 (2004)
- Atkin WS, "Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas", N Engl J Med, 326, pp.658~662 (1992)
- Snover DC, "WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system" (2010), International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Boolchand V, "Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians", Ann Intern Med, 145, pp.654~659 (2006)
- Tanaka S, "Surveillance after colorectal polypectomy: comparison between Japan and U.S", Kobe J Med Sci, 56, pp.E204~E213 (2011)
- 홍성노, "국내 대장 폴립 절제 후 추적검사 현황", Intestinal research, 9(2), pp.118~128 (2011), 대한장연구학회
- Winawer SJ, "Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps: the National Polyp Study Workgroup", N Engl J Med, 328, pp.901~906 (1993)
- Jørgensen OD, "A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas: the Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study", Scand J Gastroenterol, 30, pp.686~692 (1995)
- Lieberman DA, "Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.1077~1085 (2007)
- Chung SJ, "Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans", Gut, 60, pp.1537~1543 (2011)
- 김창준, "한국인 중간암의 유병률, 임상병리학적 특징과 예측인자", Intestinal research, 11(3), pp.178~183 (2013), 대한장연구학회
- 홍성필, "대장 상피성 종양의 분류에 따른 국내의 추적 대장내시경 검사 행태: 고도이형성 샘종과상피내암종 대 점막내암종 비교", Intestinal research, 11(4), pp.276~282 (2013), 대한장연구학회
- Leufkens AM, "Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study", Endoscopy, 44, pp.470~475 (2012)
- Kim JH, "Influence of the insertion time and number of polyps on miss rate in colonoscopy", Scand J Gastroenterol, 46, pp.634~639 (2011)
- Lieberman DA, "Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Gastroenterology, 143, pp.844~857 (2012)
- Cairns SR, "Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups", Gut, 59, pp.666~689 (2010)
- Arain MA, "CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.1189~1195 (2010)
- Sawhney MS, "Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers", Gastroenterology, 131, pp.1700~1705 (2006)