Prevalence of Proximal Serrated Polyps and Conventional Adenomas in an Asymptomatic Average-Risk Screening Population
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background/Aims: Detection of proximal serrated polyps (PSPs) is increasingly recognized as a new qualitative target for colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to assess the detected prevalence of PSPs and synchronous adenomas in an asymptomatic average-risk screening cohort and to evaluate potential factors associated with detection of PSPs. Methods: The study included 1,375 asymptomatic averagerisk Korean patients (aged 50 years or older) who underwent screening colonoscopy. In total, 1,710 polyps were evaluated pathologically. Results: The overall PSP detection rate (PSPDR) was low at 3.1%, despite high polyp (54.0%) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs, 43.5%). ADR did not correlate with PSPDR, but it was strongly correlated with PDR (r=0.810;p<0.001). Patients with PSPs were more likely to have longer withdrawal time and more proximal colon adenomas than patients without PSPs (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95%confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.31; p<0.001) (adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.88; p=0.031, respectively). Conclusions:The detected prevalence of PSPs was low (<5%) in an asymptomatic average-risk screening Korean population,despite the high prevalence of conventional adenomas. A longer mucosal inspection of the proximal colon may serve as a practical method to enhance detection of PSPs.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Detection of proximal serrated polyps (PSPs) is increasingly recognized as a new qualitative target for colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to assess the detected prevalence of PSPs and synchronous adenomas in an asymptomatic average-risk screening cohort and to evaluate potential factors associated with detection of PSPs. Methods: The study included 1,375 asymptomatic averagerisk Korean patients (aged 50 years or older) who underwent screening colonoscopy. In total, 1,710 polyps were evaluated pathologically. Results: The overall PSP detection rate (PSPDR) was low at 3.1%, despite high polyp (54.0%) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs, 43.5%). ADR did not correlate with PSPDR, but it was strongly correlated with PDR (r=0.810;p<0.001). Patients with PSPs were more likely to have longer withdrawal time and more proximal colon adenomas than patients without PSPs (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95%confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.31; p<0.001) (adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.88; p=0.031, respectively). Conclusions:The detected prevalence of PSPs was low (<5%) in an asymptomatic average-risk screening Korean population,despite the high prevalence of conventional adenomas. A longer mucosal inspection of the proximal colon may serve as a practical method to enhance detection of PSPs.
참고문헌 (28)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.873~885 (2006)
- Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)
- Baxter NN, "Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer", Ann Intern Med, 150, pp.1~8 (2009)
- Brenner H, "Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study", J Natl Cancer Inst, 102, pp.89~95 (2010)
- Lasisi F, "Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy", Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.745~754 (2011)
- Leggett B, "Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis", Gastroenterology, 138, pp.2088~2100 (2010)
- Rex DK, "Editorial: detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.2665~2669 (2010)
- East JE, "Proximal serrated polyp detection at colonoscopy: the best of times...the worst of times", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.521~524 (2012)
- Schreiner MA, "Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia", Gastroenterology, 139, pp.1497~1502 (2010)
- Hetzel JT, "Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.2656~2664 (2010)
- Kahi CJ, "Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 9, pp.42~46 (2011)
- Kahi CJ, "High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.515~520 (2012)
- Participants in the Paris Workshop, "The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon", November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc, 58(6)통권 : Suppl, pp.3~43 (2003)
- Bosman FT, "WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed" (2010), Springer-Verlag
- Rex DK, "Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.1296~1308 (2002)
- Rex DK, "High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.42~47 (2007)
- Kahi CJ, "High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.1301~1307 (2010)
- Lee CK, "Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study", GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 74(5), pp.1094~1102 (2011), MOSBY-ELSEVIER
- Wallace K, "The association of lifestyle and dietary factors with the risk for serrated polyps of the colorectum", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, pp.2310~2317 (2009)
- Lieberman DA, "VA Cooperative Study Group 380. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals", JAMA, 290, pp.2959~2967 (2003)
- Min YW, "Prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in a population at average risk undergoing screening colonoscopy: a multicenter study", Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 36, pp.604~608 (2012)
- Barclay RL, "Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy", N Engl J Med, 355, pp.2533~2541 (2006)
- Rex DK, "Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates", Gastrointest Endosc, 51, pp.33~36 (2000)
- Simmons DT, "Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 24, pp.965~971 (2006)
- Liang J, "Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy", Colorectal Dis, 14, pp.1323~1327 (2012)
- Williams JE, "Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.498~506 (2011)
- Williams JE, "Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.576~582 (2012)
- Tadepalli US, "A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 74, pp.1360~1368 (2011)