Effect of Biofeedback Therapy in Constipation According to Rectal Sensation
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The pathophysiologic mechanism of rectal hyposensitivity (RH) is not well documented, and the significance of RH in biofeedback therapy (BFT) has not been evaluated. Thus, we aimed to assess the effect of BFT in constipated patients according to the presence of RH. Methods:Five hundred and ninety constipated patients (238 males and 352 females) underwent anorectal physiologic assessments. Of these, anorectal manometry was performed before and after BFT in 244 patients (63 RH and 181 non-RH patients). Results: The success rate of BFT was 56% in the RH and 61% in the non-RH group (p=0.604). The measurements of resting pressure, squeezing pressure, desire to defecate volume, urge to defecate volume, and maximum volume were decreased after BFT in the RH group (p<0.05), whereas only resting and squeezing pressures were decreased in the non-RH group (p<0.05). Among the RH group, individuals who responded to BFT showed decreased resting pressure,squeezing pressure, desire to defecate, urge to defecate,and maximum volume and increased balloon expulsion rate;among those who did not respond to BFT, only desire to defecate volume was improved. Conclusions: In constipated patients with RH, changes of anorectal manometric findings differed in comparison to patients without RH. The responses to BFT showed both anorectal muscle relaxation and restoration of rectal sensation
Abstract
Background/Aims: The pathophysiologic mechanism of rectal hyposensitivity (RH) is not well documented, and the significance of RH in biofeedback therapy (BFT) has not been evaluated. Thus, we aimed to assess the effect of BFT in constipated patients according to the presence of RH. Methods:Five hundred and ninety constipated patients (238 males and 352 females) underwent anorectal physiologic assessments. Of these, anorectal manometry was performed before and after BFT in 244 patients (63 RH and 181 non-RH patients). Results: The success rate of BFT was 56% in the RH and 61% in the non-RH group (p=0.604). The measurements of resting pressure, squeezing pressure, desire to defecate volume, urge to defecate volume, and maximum volume were decreased after BFT in the RH group (p<0.05), whereas only resting and squeezing pressures were decreased in the non-RH group (p<0.05). Among the RH group, individuals who responded to BFT showed decreased resting pressure,squeezing pressure, desire to defecate, urge to defecate,and maximum volume and increased balloon expulsion rate;among those who did not respond to BFT, only desire to defecate volume was improved. Conclusions: In constipated patients with RH, changes of anorectal manometric findings differed in comparison to patients without RH. The responses to BFT showed both anorectal muscle relaxation and restoration of rectal sensation
참고문헌 (31)
- Sonnenberg A, "Epidemiology of constipation in the United States", Dis Colon Rectum, 32, pp.1~8 (1989)
- Pfeifer J, "Surgery for constipation: a review", Dis Colon Rectum, 39, pp.444~460 (1996)
- Keighley MR, "Anorectal physiology measurement: report of a working party", Br J Surg, 76, pp.356~357 (1989)
- Gladman MA, "Rectal hyposensitivity", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.1140~1151 (2006)
- Byoung Hwan Lee, "The Long-term Clinical Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy for Patients With Constipation or Fecal Incontinence", Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (JNM), 16(2), pp.177~185 (2010), 대한소화기 기능성질환∙운동학회
- "Anorectal function and the effect of biofeedback therapy in ambulatory spinal cord disease patients having constipation", SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 45, pp.1281~1288 (2010), INFORMA HEALTHCARE
- Rao SS, "How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders?", Am J Gastroenterol, 92, pp.469~475 (1997)
- Diamant NE, "AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques", Gastroenterology, 116, pp.735~760 (1999)
- Rao SS, "Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults", Am J Gastroenterol, 94, pp.773~783 (1999)
- Gladman MA, "Rectal hyposensitivity: prevalence and clinical impact in patients with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence", Dis Colon Rectum, 46, pp.238~246 (2003)
- Norton C, "Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults: a systematic review", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 15, pp.1147~1154 (2001)
- Cohen M, "Rationale for medical or surgical therapy in anal incontinence", Dis Colon Rectum, 29, pp.120~122 (1986)
- 정기욱, "직장감각저하 환자에서 바이오피드백 치료에 대한 장기간 효과 및 인자 분석", Intestinal research, 6(1), pp.56~59 (2008), 대한장연구학회
- Chang HS, "Functional constipation with impaired rectal sensation improved by electrical stimulation therapy: report of a case", Dis Colon Rectum, 47, pp.933~936 (2004)
- Chang HS, "Effect of electrical stimulation in constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation", Int J Colorectal Dis, 18, pp.433~438 (2003)
- Koh CE, "Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction", Br J Surg, 95, pp.1079~1087 (2008)
- Rao SS, "Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.331~338 (2007)
- Wexner SD, "Colorectal physiological tests: use or abuse of technology?", Eur J Surg, 160, pp.167~174 (1994)
- Gladman MA, "Rectal hyposensitivity: a disorder of the rectal wall or the afferent pathway? An assessment using the barostat", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.106~114 (2005)
- Gladman MA, "Clinical and physiological findings, and possible aetiological factors of rectal hyposensitivity", Br J Surg, 90, pp.860~866 (2003)
- De Medici A, "Rectal sensitivity in chronic constipation", Dig Dis Sci, 34, pp.747~753 (1989)
- Sun WM, "Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence", Gut, 31, pp.1056~1061 (1990)
- Felt-Bersma RJ, "Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range", Hepatogastroenterology, 38, pp.444~449 (1991)
- Rao SS, "Minimum standards of anorectal manometry", Neurogastroenterol Motil, 14, pp.553~559 (2002)
- Butler-Manuel SA, "Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments", Cancer, 89, pp.834~841 (2000)
- Wingate D, "Disorders of gastrointestinal motility: towards a new classification", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, (17 Suppl), pp.S1~S14 (2002)
- Pescatori M, "Colporectopexy for obstructed defecation. Do we need anorectal physiology studies?", Dis Colon Rectum, 46, pp.838~ (2003)
- Chiarioni G, "Biofeedback benefits only patients with outlet dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation", Gastroenterology, 129, pp.86~97 (2005)
- Battaglia E, "Long-term study on the effects of visual biofeedback and muscle training as a therapeutic modality in pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow-transit constipation", Dis Colon Rectum, 47, pp.90~95 (2004)
- Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, "Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation", Gut, 42, pp.517~521 (1998)
- Chiarioni G, "Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.657~664 (2006)
