Different Strategies for Transpancreatic Septotomy and Needle Knife Infundibulotomy Due to the Presence of Unintended Pancreatic Cannulation in Difficult Biliary Cannulation
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Several precut techniques have been used to gain biliary access for difficult cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) and needle knife infundibulotomy (NKI), in difficult biliary cannulation due to the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation. Methods: Eighty-six patients who failed standard biliary cannulation were included. TPS was performed when we failed to achieve biliary access despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation or when more than three attempted unintended pancreatic cannulations occurred. If deep cannulation was not achieved within 5 minutes for any duct, NKI was performed. If this failed, we crossed over to the other technique in the second attempt. Results: The initial total success rate of biliary cannulation was 88.4% (86.6% for the TPS group and 94.7% for the NKI group, p=0.447). After crossover of the techniques, the final success rate was 95.3%. The complication rate was 20.9% in patients with TPS and 15.8% in patients with NKI (p=0.753). Conclusions: The use of different strategies based on the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation may help increase the success rate for difficult biliary cannulation without increasing complication rates.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Several precut techniques have been used to gain biliary access for difficult cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) and needle knife infundibulotomy (NKI), in difficult biliary cannulation due to the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation. Methods: Eighty-six patients who failed standard biliary cannulation were included. TPS was performed when we failed to achieve biliary access despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation or when more than three attempted unintended pancreatic cannulations occurred. If deep cannulation was not achieved within 5 minutes for any duct, NKI was performed. If this failed, we crossed over to the other technique in the second attempt. Results: The initial total success rate of biliary cannulation was 88.4% (86.6% for the TPS group and 94.7% for the NKI group, p=0.447). After crossover of the techniques, the final success rate was 95.3%. The complication rate was 20.9% in patients with TPS and 15.8% in patients with NKI (p=0.753). Conclusions: The use of different strategies based on the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation may help increase the success rate for difficult biliary cannulation without increasing complication rates.
참고문헌 (21)
- Huibregtse K, "Textbook of gastroenterology", pp.2590~2617 (1995), Lippincott
- Siegel JH, "Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy", Endoscopy, 12, pp.130~133 (1980)
- Huibregtse K, "Precut papillotomy via fine-needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique", Gastrointest Endosc, 32, pp.403~405 (1986)
- Udd M, "Management of difficult bile duct cannulation in ERCP", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2, pp.97~103 (2010)
- Masci E, "Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis", Endoscopy, 35, pp.830~834 (2003)
- Kaffes AJ, "Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique", Gastrointest Endosc, 62, pp.669~674 (2005)
- Lee TH, "Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: a prospective clinical study", BMC Gastroenterol, 14, pp.30~ (2014)
- Cotton PB, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus", Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp.383~393 (1991)
- Freeman ML, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 54, pp.425~434 (2001)
- Vandervoort J, "Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.652~656 (2002)
- Goff JS, "Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach", Gastrointest Endosc, 41, pp.502~505 (1995)
- Freeman ML, "Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.909~918 (1996)
- Katsinelos P, "Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases", Dig Dis Sci, 57, pp.3286~3292 (2012)
- Catalano MF, "Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy", Gastrointest Endosc, 60, pp.557~561 (2004)
- Halttunen J, "Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation", Surg Endosc, 23, pp.745~749 (2009)
- Wang P, "Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation", J Gastrointest Surg, 14, pp.697~704 (2010)
- Yoo YW, "Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.108~114 (2013)
- Chan CH, "Wire assisted transpancreatic septotomy, needle knife precut or both for difficult biliary access", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, pp.1293~1297 (2012)
- Park CS, "Needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with periampullary diverticula and difficult bile duct cannulation", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, pp.1480~1483 (2012)
- Saritas U, "Precut sphincterotomy: a reliable salvage for difficult biliary cannulation", World J Gastroenterol, 19, pp.1~7 (2013)
- Mavrogiannis C, "Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones", Gastrointest Endosc, 50, pp.334~339 (1999)